• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Atheists: If there's no God, then where did the word "God" come from?

leibowde84

Veteran Member
Do you think it is time's working that created evolution or it is evolution that created time and space? Please
Regards
Why do you keep on refusing to answer people's questions directly? Answering questions with more questions is flat-out disrespectful.
 

Parsimony

Well-Known Member
To what language will it pertains? English? Please
Regards
It can be an English word if you want. Many languages borrow words from each other. I'll even give it a definition:

Bonwonk (verb) - To repeat oneself again and again about the same subject matter day after day.
Bonwonker (noun) - A person who bonwonks.
If we put 4 babies in a place that no one talks with them, then if they reach the age
of 20 and no one yet talks with them, what the result will be ?
I have an old textbook that speaks to something about a scenario like this. To quote:
Evolutionary Analysis said:
Language is a complex adaptation located in the neural circuitry of the brain. The vocabulary and particular grammatical rules of any given language are transmitted culturally, but the capacity for language and a fundamental grammar are, in present-day humans, both innate and universal (see Pinker 1994). Among the evidence for this assertion is the observation that communities of deaf children, if isolated from native signers, invent their own signed languages from scratch. By the end of two generations of transmission to young children within the new deaf culture, these new sign languages develop all the hallmarks of genuine language. They have a standardized vocabulary and grammar, and their fluent users can efficiently communicate the full range of human ideas and emotions. Each of these new sign languages is unique, but all reflect the same universal grammar that linguists have identified in spoken languages.
 
Last edited:

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
It can be an English word if you want. Many languages borrow words from each other. I'll even give it a definition:
Bonwonk (verb) - To repeat oneself again and again about the same subject matter day after day.
Bonwonker (noun) - A person who bonwonks.
Let us see when it is included in The Oxford English Dictionary: 20 Volume Set and CD-ROM [With CDROM] , Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary (Book & CD ROM) , Chambers Dictionary , etc, etc. Kindly inform them of the new word. Please
Regards
 

Parsimony

Well-Known Member
It doesn't have to be in the dictionary for it to be a word. If it did, then that would mean that words did not exist until dictionaries were invented. Then how could you invent a dictionary without words? It's a contradiction. If you really want to see invented words ending up in dictionaries, then try Urban Dictionary.
 

jonathan180iq

Well-Known Member
Humans could neither create an atom nor a word both are work of God , in real sense.
Regards

P.S.
atom (n.)
late 15c., as a hypothetical indivisible body, the building block of the universe, from Latin atomus (especially in Lucretius) "indivisible particle," from Greekatomos "uncut, unhewn; indivisible," from a- "not" + tomos "a cutting," from temnein "to cut" (see tome). An ancient term of philosophical speculation (in Leucippus, Democritus), revived 1805 by British chemist John Dalton. In late classical and medieval use also a unit of time, 22,560 to the hour. Atom bomb is from 1945 as both a noun and a verb; compare atomic.
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=atom

Science has borrowed it lately from language as it has no language of its own.

Bonscruptle - The feeling of sheer astonishment at the unwitting foolishness of another person.
Usage: "He really bonscruptled that post, didn't he?"

I just invented a new word, and I'm an atheist... So your argument is now invalid.
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Bonscruptle - The feeling of sheer astonishment at the unwitting foolishness of another person.
Usage: "He really bonscruptled that post, didn't he?"
I just invented a new word, and I'm an atheist... So your argument is now invalid.
You may benefit from my post #143 , no compulsion however and whatsoever. Please
Regards
 

jonathan180iq

Well-Known Member
You may benefit from my post #143 , no compulsion however and whatsoever. Please
Regards
There were 1,000 new words or phrases added to the Oxford English dictionary this past year...
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/words/what-s-new

Did God create the word "manspreading" about men's seating positions on public transport 3,000 years ago? I don't think so...
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/manspreading

Words are added to dictionaries simply because they are found to be used among people. The entire evolution of human language is based on this fact.

If you and I agree that the sound, "UGH" means "rock", and if that agreed upon meaning is used by more and more people to mean the same thing, then we would have created a new word. Please read some more about the origin and development of language before you try and continue with this argument - for your integrity's sake.
 

beenherebeforeagain

Rogue Animist
Premium Member
@paarsurrey
I think you should answer this question.
Tom
Lots of people have asked questions of @paarsurrey in this thread. His inability or unwillingness to answer speaks volumes about his reasoning and his intentions. His unwillingness or inability to provide the same kind of proof for his own OP assertions as he demands of everyone else also speaks volumes about his reasoning and intentions.

I had forgotten why I stopped paying attention to his posts; now I am reminded. I will henceforth not bother with him ever again.
 

Ouroboros

Coincidentia oppositorum
There are many words that are not included in those dictionaries. Most of them explain why this is so in their preface. For instance many of them don't include slang or technical terms like LAN (local area network) or chemical names of molecule and such. A dictionary tends to focus on the basic language only.
 

Demonslayer

Well-Known Member
His inability or unwillingness to answer speaks volumes about his reasoning and his intentions.

Can you even use the term "reasoning" when talking about someone who's argument is "if there is no God where did the word God come from?" I don't think any reasoning is involved at all. I've heard a lot of unsatisfying, silly, and downright ridiculous arguments for God, but this may be the absolute worst one I've ever heard.
 

beenherebeforeagain

Rogue Animist
Premium Member
Can you even use the term "reasoning" when talking about someone who's argument is "if there is no God where did the word God come from?" I don't think any reasoning is involved at all. I've heard a lot of unsatisfying, silly, and downright ridiculous arguments for God, but this may be the absolute worst one I've ever heard.
I was using reasoning in the sense of the pattern he uses in an attempt to find support for his usually ridiculous assertions. He has a very specific pattern for this. His "reasoning" is to make an assertion, wait for responses, ask for further responses to questions, act polite (please and regards in most every post), demand levels of evidence that are inappropriate in kind or degree for the subject at hand, select sentences and sometimes phrases out of others' statements, and eventually to abandon the thread once he has collected enough of these statements to support his position. As well as collecting frubals whenever he can get them. This is his pattern of reasoning, his way of winning arguments. That everyone else is trying to play by the more-or-less rules of rhetoric and debate is irrelevant--that isn't how he's playing.
 

beenherebeforeagain

Rogue Animist
Premium Member
Talking behind someone's back to their face serves no good.
Perhaps; but I have said as much directly to @paarsurrey before, and consider my last couple of posts to be directed to him, as he has invited this public debate on this topic, and I would say no different if we were on a formal debate stage, face to face.

And I plan for this post to be the last I make to or about Mr. Paarsurvey and any of his topics or responses.
 
Top