Trailblazer
Veteran Member
That's right, just as your belief that Jesus was the Son of God and the third person of the Trinity could be true or false.Exactly. Your belief that the B.man is a messenger of God could be true, or it could be false.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That's right, just as your belief that Jesus was the Son of God and the third person of the Trinity could be true or false.Exactly. Your belief that the B.man is a messenger of God could be true, or it could be false.
Would you at least agree that the vast majority of messengers are liars and deceivers of those who believe them? Walk with me for a minute;No, you are wrong about that as the Messengers are credible to most people.
84 percent of the world population has a faith.
Because most faiths have a religious Founder or what I call a Messenger that means most people believe in God because of a Messenger. We know that Christians and Muslims believe in a Messenger and they comprise 55% of the world population. It does not matter if you call them a Messenger; they are holy men who founded the religions, so they are intermediaries between God and man. Sure, there are a few believers who believe in God but not a Messenger but that is not the norm. The point is that with no Messengers or holy men very few people would believe in God.
The vast majority of men who claimed to be Messengers were false claimants so they were either deluded or they were liars, con men aspiring to fame or fortune.Would you at least agree that the vast majority of messengers are liars and deceivers of those who believe them? Walk with me for a minute;
*According to all of the Christian messengers, God has a son named Jesus who was Executed by the Romans and rose 3 days later and ascended to Heaven
*According to all of the Islamic messengers, God does not have a son but Jesus was a prophet of God (Allah) and was never crucified, but was taken directly to Heaven by Allah.
With this bit of logic you must agree that either all Islamic messengers, OR all Christian messengers are liars; they both can’t be telling the truth because their claims contradict each other. This idea that all religions lead to the same God they just call him a different name is the view of those ignorant of religions IMO. Now let’s throw Hinduism in this mix
*According to all of the Hindu messengers, Brahma created the Universe and everything in it; and before you go saying same God just different interpretations of God, NO Brahma was actually born! Where as Allah (Islam God) and Yahweh (Christian God) have an eternal existence as creators of the Universe and everything in it.
So you can throw all of the Hindu messengers into the loop of liars if any of the other two mentioned are telling the truth; or you can claim Hindu messengers are truthful and Islam and Christian messengers are liars. (or you can do like me and believe they are all liars)
Again; would you at least agree the vast majority of messengers are liars, and deceiving those who believe them?
That's right, just as your belief that Jesus was the Son of God and the third person of the Trinity could be true or false.
So if the vast majority of Messengers are liars leading seekers astray, why would God depend upon such a system to get his true message across when he could just give the message himself?The vast majority of men who claimed to be Messengers were false claimants so they were either deluded or they were liars, con men aspiring to fame or fortune.
A true religion? No; they established multiple religions that contradict each other. They all can't be right! Was Jesus the Christ right? Was Muhammad right? Or were some of the others you mentioned right; because the others must be wrong.The Baha'is believe there were only a numbered few true Messengers of God who we refer to as Manifestations of God who appeared independently (e.g.,Abraham, Krishna, Moses, Zoroaster, Buddha, Christ, Muhammad, the Bab and Baha’u’llah). These men received communication from God, ushered in a new religious cycle and established a true religion.
No, you don't got it.You got it!
My belief is not based on objective evidence.
Your belief is not based on objective evidence.
The difference, of course, is that I have never said that my belief is based on objective evidence.
God gave us all a brain and mind so it is up to people to differentiate between the false messengers and the True Messengers. It is not that difficult to eliminate the definitely false ones although it us not easy for everyone to identify the True Messenger of God when He appears, at least not for a long time after He appears.So if the vast majority of Messengers are liars leading seekers astray, why would God depend upon such a system to get his true message across when he could just give the message himself?
The Messengers of God did not establish religions that contradicted each other, although the religions were different, since mankind's needs were different in every age.A true religion? No; they established multiple religions that contradict each other. They all can't be right! Was Jesus the Christ right? Was Muhammad right? Or were some of the others you mentioned right; because the others must be wrong.
They all express a type of truth.Would you at least agree that the vast majority of messengers are liars and deceivers of those who believe them? Walk with me for a minute;
*According to all of the Christian messengers, God has a son named Jesus who was Executed by the Romans and rose 3 days later and ascended to Heaven
*According to all of the Islamic messengers, God does not have a son but Jesus was a prophet of God (Allah) and was never crucified, but was taken directly to Heaven by Allah.
With this bit of logic you must agree that either all Islamic messengers, OR all Christian messengers are liars; they both can’t be telling the truth because their claims contradict each other. This idea that all religions lead to the same God they just call him a different name is the view of those ignorant of religions IMO. Now let’s throw Hinduism in this mix
*According to all of the Hindu messengers, Brahma created the Universe and everything in it; and before you go saying same God just different interpretations of God, NO Brahma was actually born! Where as Allah (Islam God) and Yahweh (Christian God) have an eternal existence as creators of the Universe and everything in it.
So you can throw all of the Hindu messengers into the loop of liars if any of the other two mentioned are telling the truth; or you can claim Hindu messengers are truthful and Islam and Christian messengers are liars. (or you can do like me and believe they are all liars)
Again; would you at least agree the vast majority of messengers are liars, and deceiving those who believe them?
Most follow the false messengers though.God gave us all a brain and mind so it is up to people to differentiate between the false messengers and the True Messengers.
One of the natures of God is that he is Omniscient which means he has unlimited knowledge and ability. If God is Omniscient, he does have the ability to deliver the message himself in a way that humans can understand it.God cannot deliver the message Himself in any way that humans could ever understand it.
Our father is the eternal being using our fathers recorded human life memory as the communication causes.Most follow the false messengers though.
One of the natures of God is that he is Omniscient which means he has unlimited knowledge and ability. If God is Omniscient, he does have the ability to deliver the message himself in a way that humans can understand it.
DNA national inheritance is a mind life body personal experience. Human diversity.So if the vast majority of Messengers are liars leading seekers astray, why would God depend upon such a system to get his true message across when he could just give the message himself?
A true religion? No; they established multiple religions that contradict each other. They all can't be right! Was Jesus the Christ right? Was Muhammad right? Or were some of the others you mentioned right; because the others must be wrong.
So you have the ability to communicate with God?Our father is the eternal being using our fathers recorded human life memory as the communication causes.
I love him. He loves me.
I feel his love.
He told me his children are innocent of their inheritance. He however expresses human conditions also. And he does not love our brothers scientific dishonourable acts of inhumanity.
Why I know he is real as he does not lie.
No, I believe that most follow the true Messengers, Abraham, Krishna, Moses, Zoroaster, Buddha, Christ, Muhammad, the Bab and Baha’u’llah.Most follow the false messengers though.
Omnipotence means God is all-powerful.One of the natures of God is that he is Omniscient which means he has unlimited knowledge and ability. If God is Omniscient, he does have the ability to deliver the message himself in a way that humans can understand it.
So you have decided these messengers are true, on what authority?No, I believe that most follow the true Messengers, Abraham, Krishna, Moses, Zoroaster, Buddha, Christ, Muhammad, the Bab and Baha’u’llah.
Omnipotence means God is all-powerful.
Omniscience means God is all-knowing.
It does not matter that God had the knowledge and the ability. Humans do not have the ability to understand God directly. The only way that could be different is if God recreated humans and gave them that ability.
And it's without a doubt true, because it is written in the Bible, which is the inerrant word of God, therefore it is true. How much more proof doesn't a person need?But how could they hear it if it didn't happen? Therefore, since they believe it,. it must have happened, and thus the Jewish faith is correct.
And out of that 84% how many have a faith in something that the Baha'is would agree with and say is true?
So, God could make them with a higher spiritual capacity but would rather not? Yeah, thousands of years of people fighting and killing each other like the lower natured animals. Great plan.That's right, and since God is the 'omnipotent' Creator it is God's prerogative to make people however He wants to make them.
As I pointed out to you before, their messages contradict! They all can't be telling the truth.No, I believe that most follow the true Messengers, Abraham, Krishna, Moses, Zoroaster, Buddha, Christ, Muhammad, the Bab and Baha’u’llah.
Again; if God has unlimited ability, that would mean he has the ability to communicate to humans in a way that we DO understand God directly.It does not matter that God had the knowledge and the ability. Humans do not have the ability to understand God directly. The only way that could be different is if God recreated humans and gave them that ability.
Except for your prophets, The Bab and Baha'u'llah, how do you know those other ones were true messengers? Did you study them and find that to be true, or you're just going by what your religion tells you? Just like those Christians that "know" Baha'u'llah is a false prophet without studying about him and his teachings themselves. They just go by what their religion tells them is true.No, I believe that most follow the true Messengers, Abraham, Krishna, Moses, Zoroaster, Buddha, Christ, Muhammad, the Bab and Baha’u’llah.
Again, if God is the creator, he purposely made humans with a lack of spiritual capacity. Baha'u'llah, or even Abdul Baha, they had normal looking bodies. How different were they than other people? A little tweak in the brain is all it would take.Humans do not have the ability to understand God directly. The only way that could be different is if God recreated humans and gave them that ability.