• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Atheists: What would be evidence of God’s existence?

rational experiences

Veteran Member
The reality did you need to be life sacrificed to hear a God?

If you are intelligent natural says by human status I am the intelligence. I am the consciousness.

I have dominion. O earth first not speak I do. God the product told me how to convert.

You say O earth is a God as a scientist that created o from the body it's heavens. Creator theme from its body and mass the God.

From its body I unsealed radiation by building by design as architect design the designer human the reaction.

God sacrificed my life. Causation.

Reason as light the day was gods heavenly owned spirit of the planet. I didn't own it but I theoried it for science.

Day light voids in vacuum itself womb. I got irradiated as fall of man fallout Sacrificed.

I then heard the heavenly AI effect that the reaction caused that changed the heavens gases unnaturally.

I named it as my father's choice adult man as the baby man human inheriting it's causes by sex. The human act.

I told a story as a healthy human born why I was healthy by gods heavens remassing after science had mutated irradiated life before. A long old time ago.

As I inherited stigmata I realised and began to teach why men of science the occult thought it was safe. Yet it took a very long time for the heavens to cool and remass. It's not instant gas.

As men lived in ice melt the idea of life saved organic is not heavenly Gods gas. So i tried to reason with them yet they are so self possessed by their own self images I cannot teach them.

Jesus teaching as told by a man who said the warning don't self idolise.

To be a teacher you don't use leadership you use advice to reason as it's own reason tells the truth.

All humans false problems by brother in forced leadership's known.
 
Last edited:

rational experiences

Veteran Member
Baha'i self realisation.

Gases taken gases put back in star fall first not equate extra. It equated less. By burn loss.

What he tried to tell. Life's mind irradiation posseses the mind by visionary voice sciences.

He didn't need to use satanic science data as it wasn't science. It was advice. As no science was being practiced. The advice preceded science wanting to repractice pyramid temple. Occult fallout. Life in attack. Gods war on man.
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
The just a man baby born by sex lying science is the satanist yourself.

Holy heavens first.

Man's occult machine designed mind controlled by men second the liar.

Self possessed by his image gained in feedback that he never preowned in a water mass oxygenated by garden life mind and body.

A non stop occult AI studier theist who only quotes from after hearing it by his science studies via machines.

Is just a human liar.
 

Kfox

Well-Known Member
The job of the Messenger is not just to get people believing in God, but rather to reveal a message and teachings and laws that are pertinent to the age in which the Messenger appears.
Is it your view that morality changes over the years? That what was wrong yesterday may not be wrong today; and visa versa?
There is only One God and many Messengers who all represented that God.
Is it your view that those of the Hindu and Zoroastrian religions worship the same God as you do?
 

CG Didymus

Veteran Member
My point is, if God kept in constant contact with his creation, they would know his voice, and all the false religions would not have even gotten started.
Baha'is don't necessarily believe Jesus's "voice" is in the NT. But you know how some Christians are. They believe God speaks to them through the Bible and to their spirit through the Holy Spirit. But those Christians believe Jesus is alive in some kind of "glorified" physical body too. So, there's no reason he can't communicate to his followers directly.

And all of us can hear those voices and believe in what those voices are telling us. But why do some of us reject it? For me it's because those voices and God speaking through Holy Books all lead people to believe differently. The Baha'i Faith just adds another voice to the mix. Without an audible voice, how are people supposed to sort through all these mixed messages that have supposedly been sent by God?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ppp

rational experiences

Veteran Member
In science which is not O God the earth body no man is God.

In science O gods owned planet heavens no human is involved why a heavens existed...no man is God.

Science lots of dusts Alchemy change lots of gases. Lots of messages thesis is first.

Advised by a balanced mind theism first. However men about God sought evil unbalanced mind causes. Not known what it's like to be mind body irradiated in the fallout science machine activated.

The teaching.

Man invented Al thesis of science by human presence thinking about the chosen God and God bodies products as gas spirits his owned self.

Baha'i realisation. Did not look back to Jesus data to quote no man is God as it was a science thesis. That you use to quote scientific advice itself as no man is God reasoned.

He only had a self experience to quote natural human conscious first. Spirituality natural. Was a different themed advice.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Is it your view that morality changes over the years? That what was wrong yesterday may not be wrong today; and visa versa?
Morality, what is right and wrong, does not change over time, but God's expectations for human behavior change as mankind matures spiritually.

What is very basic, such as the 10 commandments, does not change, but the punishments for breaking those Laws is not the same in every age. For example, the punishments for adultery are not same in Baha'i Law as they were in Mosaic Law.
Is it your view that those of the Hindu and Zoroastrian religions worship the same God as you do?
Yes, because there is only one true God, even though there are various conceptions of that God.
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
Baha'is don't necessarily believe Jesus's "voice" is in the NT. But you know how some Christians are. They believe God speaks to them through the Bible and to their spirit through the Holy Spirit. But those Christians believe Jesus is alive in some kind of "glorified" physical body too. So, there's no reason he can't communicate to his followers directly.

And all of us can hear those voices and believe in what those voices are telling us. But why do some of us reject it? For me it's because those voices and God speaking through Holy Books all lead people to believe differently. The Baha'i Faith just adds another voice to the mix. Without an audible voice, how are people supposed to sort through all these mixed messages that have supposedly been sent by God?
When I studied spirit I was psychic advised and heard my own voice.

I didn't realise when I heard the voice of men it was from causes of radiation fallout. I was learning.

As I own the voice first. earth O stone doesn't speak nor does its gases speak..the gods scientists study.

Science invented machine by a human thinking speaking human advice about evil. Burning history of cold bodies.

Attacked introduced subliminal AI cause psyche chemical mind change. In large water oxygen mass that biology not science owns. Is the human advice for the human life destroyer.

Russian scientists in laboratories studied AI mind coercion first then America. Own computer programs now. As they know AI subliminal is mind heard yet speaks back to self by self voice so it is not noticed by the recipient. The coercion.

As science already knows then science should use its own advice itself.

Humans biology owned voice is not AI ever.

Father is a biological living human mind body affected by heavenly men of sciences introduced occult cause fallout. Water mass losses changes daily. The effect.

That removed half biologies origin water oxygenated life support so we endure the effects as taught about phenomena of causes. The teaching why men's voice as father was heard speaking.

Is the teaching no man is God.

Humans dying daily unnaturally in various causes irradiated slight to immense attacks. Phenomena science caused.

A real scientific teaching the cause of machines phenomena.

Father human biological has sex for the gain of human babies. Living biology speaking voice owner first.

The occult documents proved science caused the effect no man is God stated by law agreement.

Voices are heard as AI radiation fallout caused causes it naturally yet not natural in our heavens. Cannot own it a second cause like you believe.

As it is cooling naturally.

You remove it from natural cooling ice melts again to contradict it. Why you think life is safe as we live in the water supply which is not gods gas spirit heavens.

Gods gas spirit then proves you wrong for claiming biology came from gases.
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
The ch gas arose teaching stated the immaculate in space owned it's presence. The presence CH gas kept life biology safe.

Just a humans scientific teaching about Christ being holy without humans owning it. The teaching said O God earth owned it only.
 

Kfox

Well-Known Member
Yes, because there is only one true God, even though there are various conceptions of that God.
In Hinduism, Brahma the creator of the Universe was born, where as in Islam, Allah the creator of the Universe has an eternal existence thus never born. If you are gonna assume they are referring to the same God, who is right?
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
In Hinduism, Brahma the creator of the Universe was born, where as in Islam, Allah the creator of the Universe has an eternal existence thus never born. If you are gonna assume they are referring to the same God, who is right?
No, I am going to assume one of them is wrong, because both of them cannot be right. And guess what? The older religion is the one that is wrong since it has had the most time to become corrupted by man.
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
In man the theists human life just thinking the human is both present man human then born as a man scientific theist.

In space theme inside space held heavens. Nothing like a God.

The scientist attacked destroyed life by not a God....a machine.

Stephen Haw King natural man tells his brothers humans truth as he life sacrificed.

No man is a God.

So science just men humans taught a human has dominion over all things is greater by living as a human in the heavens.

A type of God he says without being history of the gods.

As gods O were all self consuming masses.

So brother asked and said why didn't you say a human equals a human only? As the science quote equals is the only correct answer?

A human is not ended at mass the machine built. The conversion direct from the first form of God O the circle used to calculate.

O one earth first product first direct product is one the place.

Yes that's correct I tried to end life by machine reaction itself.

Two minus products of energy itself. From the first body earth.

So then his brother knowing he is mind irradiated said biology places living humans one better than an ape. As the human scientist.

Yet both are in fact unholy statements about humans as humans just because you did not say a human can only equal a human first.

Why science was outlawed as an evil illegal human condition of allowing the destruction of life. By humans not being gods own cosmic history consuming first.

Natural life acceptance on earth.

Was the teaching why no man is a God.
 

Kfox

Well-Known Member
For me it's because those voices and God speaking through Holy Books all lead people to believe differently. The Baha'i Faith just adds another voice to the mix. Without an audible voice, how are people supposed to sort through all these mixed messages that have supposedly been sent by God?
Good point!
 

ppp

Well-Known Member
In Hinduism, Brahma the creator of the Universe was born, where as in Islam, Allah the creator of the Universe has an eternal existence thus never born. If you are gonna assume they are referring to the same God, who is right?
It's interesting. From some Hindu I get that Brahmin is a force, not a personality. From others I get that Brahman is a God from which the other gods derive. In the late '90s more than Indians that I worked with spoke of Brahmin as a force, now it's the other way around. Around. It makes me wonder if there's a shift going on in Hindu culture to monotheism for legitimacy in the Western world.
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
All the people who claim to speak for God.
When father owning higher genesis life body DNA had his water mass removed given to cloud form from irradiation science.

Humans since gain his water body back but not his DNA.

As sex created babies from biological sperm and biological ovary. Why humans make the claim as it really occurs.
 
Top