• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Atheists win! They have the fossils! What do the fossils prove?

Are you willing to admit that MAYBE a supernatural entity has left evidence for it's existence?

  • Yes

    Votes: 9 47.4%
  • No

    Votes: 10 52.6%

  • Total voters
    19

Spiderman

Veteran Member
First off, I'm not trying to get anyone to believe in the Bible...so don't bring it up!...Much of the Bible I find ridiculous and goes against my conscience. Most people who believe in supernatural entities, don't believe the Bible is without error. Even over a billion Catholic Christians do not use the Bible as the sole rule of their faith, and many don't follow it for that matter.

Regarding the question in the poll...you can only use so many words in the question...what I'm really asking, is "are you willing to admit that supernatural entities may indeed contact certain people, may indeed give visions, may indeed miraculously heal people?

How do you know all the Catholic Saints, stigmatics, Prophets, visionaries, mystics, or healers were all delusional? How do you know all the Sadhu's, Gurus, Polytheistic Priests, Shamans, medicine men, and necromancers were all just following thoughts in their head...How do you know they weren't connecting to a spririt-world, interacting with spiritual entities (good or bad), and going on vision quests with spirit-guides? How do you know they weren't bringing messages from the spirit-world to their tribe and sometimes channeling healing energy from the spirit-world to the material world, causing miraculous healings?

Many eyewitnesses have testified that they witnessed these unexplainable mystic phenomenon, or been healed by these people, or had someone read their heart, tell them things about themselves they shouldn't know, or give a prophecy that came true.


Statistics show that roughly 93% of people in our enlightened century believe in Spiritual entities...How do you know that much of the world embraces a delusion and often center their whole lives around it...are 93% of the people insane...How do you know that their reason for believing isn't based on evidence that the Creator left them?

Okay, so there are fossils indicating that at one time in history there were homo erectus (and homo whatever)... that had different skulls

8481313795_168525c728_z.jpg


How on earth does that mean there was no supernatural creator? So, at one time the creator worked with the mechanisms of Science to create homo-erectus with different skulls than ours. For whatever reason, they went extinct...

Isn't it interesting that Chimps, monkeys, orangutans, baboons, and gorillas survived, but these other homo erectus, who should have been more clever, went extinct...hmmm....maybe they were dumber than a box of rocks? :shrug:

How does that prove there is no supernatural entity? So we have some fossils...do we see evidence that a single cell organism can come into existence (how?) and then mutate into fish, Dinosaurs, reptiles, birds, rodents, insects, arachnids, mammals, and eventually you??

I'm firmly convinced that such transformation and mutations do not happen with scientific mechanisms as the sole basis for such glorious and beautiful transformation.

Do we see any living creatures in the 21st century that are transitioning and mutating into another species?

Atheists keep telling me....why believe something when there is no evidence....*sign*...it's exhausting repeating myself.

Many people, including Doctors and scientists have made statements that would indicate there is evidence that the creator is indeed giving people signs....There are Scientists who believe in Supernatural entities..(but people who don't want to believe will find every source they can that *"debunks it"*.) How do you know they are mistaken and delusional?

I know I've said this before...but atheists keep asking for evidence, so I'll repeat myself:

Miracle of the Sun - Wikipedia
Of course the sun didn't dance in the sky....we all know that...it was a vision that a crowd of thousands of people said they saw, and wrote about it, and media and cameras were there. Many communists, skeptics, atheists, and freemasons showed up to mock the event and were stunned with what they saw...it was a sign for them....nothing happened to the sun...And three illiterate shepherd children made prophecies about serious future calamities like the rise of communism in Russia, the spread of communism throughout the world, and the coming of world war 2, and that the sky would be illuminated by an unknown light, prior to world war 2, it all happened...
(In spite of much study and investigation, scientists were unable to explain the great light that “struck fear into the hearts of millions” (F. Johnston). An unknown light in 1938 demands our attention – even today - Our Lady's Blue Army - World Apostolate of Fatima U.S.A.) that did take place, and they prophesied about the coming of their early death, all of which took place.


A sign was promised to all who showed up at a certain place, on a certain day, and thousands of eye-witnesses claim they saw the sun dance for approx. ten minutes, and then plunge down on the crowd. Many communists and atheists witnessed this and converted...it lead to religious fervor that was largely responsible for the fall of communism in Portugal.. How do you know there was no supernatural entity that gave these people a sign?...Were you there? Well, that is evidence. In fact, it changed the world in many ways, established a feast day that is celebrated by over a billion people, lead to movies, documentaries, many books as well...a massive shrine was erected there, the seers were canonized, and millions of pilgrims go there every years. Something very well may have happened there.

Maybe the creator did leave evidence for those people...you simply don't know.
th
th
th
th
th

Whenever there is supernatural phenomenon, there will be skeptics who come up with a clever rebuttal for it. People believe what they want to. There are sources that claim to "rebuttal" almost anything controversial or supernatural.
More miracles:
Infallible Catholic: Miraculous Image of Our Lady of Guadalupe
Miracle Hunter: Lourdes - List of Approved Miracles

The Medical committee at Lourdes is totally independent of the Church. They use skeptics on the committees, the rules are geared to control for remission. They screen our remission. They are required to use only the best medical evidence, to consult the doctors of the patients and they cannot make decisions without obtaining the medical records of those doctors. "They do examine the patients. It does have to be proven that the people were sick beforehand! they will only choose a case when they cannot find a naturalistic explaination."
cientific Evidence for Miracles page 1: examination of the Lourdes rules for miracel acceptence.

So, a single cell organism eventually managed to mutate into this...(sometimes a picture can speak volumes. Evolution is artistic):
th
th
th
th
th
th
th
th
th
th
th
 
Last edited by a moderator:

SomeRandom

Still learning to be wise
Staff member
Premium Member
Okay @PopeADope buddy, if it's so important to you, why not actually study evolution properly? All you're doing is making yourself look utterly ignorant of basic science. That is not a good look on you.
Also have you never seen a pregnancy in action before? Never seen a cell duplicate, mutate and spread like wildfire?
Christ we were doing that in high school. They're called microscopes.
And I'm pretty sure Jurrassic Park explained how fossils work, never mind primary school level palaeontology.
 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
It's possible (as in greater than zero chance) that some sort of supernatural entity has contacted people. Have to admit, I struggle to conceptualise what 'supernatural' even means.

However it's certain that many people claiming to be contacted are completely full of crap.

It also begs the question as to what the point would be. If God wants to make himself known, he can just go on Late Night with Steven Colbert.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
First off, I'm not trying to get anyone to believe in the Bible...so don't bring it up!...Much of the Bible I find ridiculous and goes against my conscience. Most people who believe in supernatural entities, don't believe the Bible is without error. Even over a billion Catholic Christians do not use the Bible as the sole rule of their faith, and many don't follow it for that matter.

Regarding the question in the poll...you can only use so many words in the question...what I'm really asking, is "are you willing to admit that supernatural entities may indeed contact certain people, may indeed give visions, may indeed miraculously heal people?

How do you know all the Catholic Saints, stigmatics, Prophets, visionaries, mystics, or healers were all delusional? How do you know all the Sadhu's, Gurus, Polytheistic Priests, Shamans, medicine men, and necromancers were all just following thoughts in their head...How do you know they weren't connecting to a spririt-world, interacting with spiritual entities (good or bad), and going on vision quests with spirit-guides? How do you know they weren't bringing messages from the spirit-world to their tribe and sometimes channeling healing energy from the spirit-world to the material world, causing miraculous healings?

Many eyewitnesses have testified that they witnessed these unexplainable mystic phenomenon, or been healed by these people, or had someone read their heart, tell them things about themselves they shouldn't know, or give a prophecy that came true.


Statistics show that roughly 93% of people in our enlightened century believe in Spiritual entities...How do you know that much of the world embraces a delusion and often center their whole lives around it...are 93% of the people insane...How do you know that their reason for believing isn't based on evidence that the Creator left them?

Okay, so there are fossils indicating that at one time in history there were homo sapiens that had different skulls

8481313795_168525c728_z.jpg


How on earth does that mean there was no supernatural creator? So, at one time the creator worked with the mechanisms of Science to create homo-sapiens with different skulls than ours. For whatever reason, they went extinct...

Isn't it interesting that Chimps, monkeys, orangutans, baboons, and gorillas survived, but these other homo sapiens, who should have been more clever, went extinct...hmmm....maybe they were dumber than a box of rocks? :shrug:

How does that prove there is no supernatural entity? So we have some fossils...do we see evidence that a single cell organism can come into existence (how?) and then mutate into fish, Dinosaurs, reptiles, birds, rodents, insects, arachnids, mammals, and eventually you??

I'm firmly convinced that such transformation and mutations do not happen with scientific mechanisms as the sole basis for such glorious and beautiful transformation.

Do we see any living creatures in the 21st century that are transitioning and mutating into another species?

Atheists keep telling me....why believe something when there is no evidence....*sign*...it's exhausting repeating myself.

Many people, including Doctors and scientists have made statements that would indicate there is evidence that the creator is indeed giving people signs....There are Scientists who believe in Supernatural entities..(but people who don't want to believe will find every source they can that *"debunks it"*.) How do you know they are mistaken and delusional?

I know I've said this before...but atheists keep asking for evidence, so I'll repeat myself:

Miracle of the Sun - Wikipedia
Of course the sun didn't dance in the sky....we all know that...it was a vision that a crowd of thousands of people said they saw, and wrote about it, and media and cameras were there. Many communists, skeptics, atheists, and freemasons showed up to mock the event and were stunned with what they saw...it was a sign for them....nothing happened to the sun...And three illiterate shepherd children made prophecies about serious future calamities like the rise of communism in Russia, the spread of communism throughout the world, and the coming of world war 2, and that the sky would be illuminated by an unknown light, prior to world war 2, it all happened...
(In spite of much study and investigation, scientists were unable to explain the great light that “struck fear into the hearts of millions” (F. Johnston). An unknown light in 1938 demands our attention – even today - Our Lady's Blue Army - World Apostolate of Fatima U.S.A.) that did take place, and they prophesied about the coming of their early death, all of which took place.


A sign was promised to all who showed up at a certain place, on a certain day, and thousands of eye-witnesses claim they saw the sun dance for approx. ten minutes, and then plunge down on the crowd. Many communists and atheists witnessed this and converted...it lead to religious fervor that was largely responsible for the fall of communism in Portugal.. How do you know there was no supernatural entity that gave these people a sign?...Were you there? Well, that is evidence. In fact, it changed the world in many ways, established a feast day that is celebrated by over a billion people, lead to movies, documentaries, many books as well...a massive shrine was erected there, the seers were canonized, and millions of pilgrims go there every years. Something very well may have happened there.

Maybe the creator did leave evidence for those people...you simply don't know.
th
th
th
th
th

Whenever there is supernatural phenomenon, there will be skeptics who come up with a clever rebuttal for it. People believe what they want to. There are sources that claim to "rebuttal" almost anything controversial or supernatural.
More miracles:
Infallible Catholic: Miraculous Image of Our Lady of Guadalupe
Miracle Hunter: Lourdes - List of Approved Miracles

The Medical committee at Lourdes is totally independent of the Church. They use skeptics on the committees, the rules are geared to control for remission. They screen our remission. They are required to use only the best medical evidence, to consult the doctors of the patients and they cannot make decisions without obtaining the medical records of those doctors. "They do examine the patients. It does have to be proven that the people were sick beforehand! they will only choose a case when they cannot find a naturalistic explaination."
cientific Evidence for Miracles page 1: examination of the Lourdes rules for miracel acceptence.

So, a single cell organism eventually managed to mutate into this...(sometimes a picture can speak volumes. Evolution is artistic):
th
th
th
th
th
th
th
th
th
th
th
Have you ever noticed how things like this are always vague? Outside the miracle or occurrence itself, there's really not a whole lot of information that is disclosed.

I'd be willing to bet the Catholic Church wouldn't let a medical doctor outside the Catholic faith touch or critically examine anything with a ten-foot pole.

Miracles observed by the masses well, I'm sure they would surely get stopped if they attempted to come closer and take a more critical look as if they don't want you to see things close up. I'm sure there was a healthy distance between on lookers and the responsible parties.

Interesting thing about things like Lourdes is their own mother who knew her children the best discounted them as having quite an imagination, which would be an understatement given there are so many facets to explaining away such things.

I think Catholics and other religious get a little bit too crazy over these kind of things for which the church is reluctant to expand upon given the hysterics that people show in light of such things.
 

viole

Ontological Naturalist
Premium Member
First off, I'm not trying to get anyone to believe in the Bible...so don't bring it up!...Much of the Bible I find ridiculous and goes against my conscience. Most people who believe in supernatural entities, don't believe the Bible is without error. Even over a billion Catholic Christians do not use the Bible as the sole rule of their faith, and many don't follow it for that matter.

Regarding the question in the poll...you can only use so many words in the question...what I'm really asking, is "are you willing to admit that supernatural entities may indeed contact certain people, may indeed give visions, may indeed miraculously heal people?

How do you know all the Catholic Saints, stigmatics, Prophets, visionaries, mystics, or healers were all delusional? How do you know all the Sadhu's, Gurus, Polytheistic Priests, Shamans, medicine men, and necromancers were all just following thoughts in their head...How do you know they weren't connecting to a spririt-world, interacting with spiritual entities (good or bad), and going on vision quests with spirit-guides? How do you know they weren't bringing messages from the spirit-world to their tribe and sometimes channeling healing energy from the spirit-world to the material world, causing miraculous healings?

Many eyewitnesses have testified that they witnessed these unexplainable mystic phenomenon, or been healed by these people, or had someone read their heart, tell them things about themselves they shouldn't know, or give a prophecy that came true.


Statistics show that roughly 93% of people in our enlightened century believe in Spiritual entities...How do you know that much of the world embraces a delusion and often center their whole lives around it...are 93% of the people insane...How do you know that their reason for believing isn't based on evidence that the Creator left them?

Okay, so there are fossils indicating that at one time in history there were homo sapiens that had different skulls

8481313795_168525c728_z.jpg


How on earth does that mean there was no supernatural creator? So, at one time the creator worked with the mechanisms of Science to create homo-sapiens with different skulls than ours. For whatever reason, they went extinct...

Isn't it interesting that Chimps, monkeys, orangutans, baboons, and gorillas survived, but these other homo sapiens, who should have been more clever, went extinct...hmmm....maybe they were dumber than a box of rocks? :shrug:

How does that prove there is no supernatural entity? So we have some fossils...do we see evidence that a single cell organism can come into existence (how?) and then mutate into fish, Dinosaurs, reptiles, birds, rodents, insects, arachnids, mammals, and eventually you??

I'm firmly convinced that such transformation and mutations do not happen with scientific mechanisms as the sole basis for such glorious and beautiful transformation.

Do we see any living creatures in the 21st century that are transitioning and mutating into another species?

Atheists keep telling me....why believe something when there is no evidence....*sign*...it's exhausting repeating myself.

Many people, including Doctors and scientists have made statements that would indicate there is evidence that the creator is indeed giving people signs....There are Scientists who believe in Supernatural entities..(but people who don't want to believe will find every source they can that *"debunks it"*.) How do you know they are mistaken and delusional?

I know I've said this before...but atheists keep asking for evidence, so I'll repeat myself:

Miracle of the Sun - Wikipedia
Of course the sun didn't dance in the sky....we all know that...it was a vision that a crowd of thousands of people said they saw, and wrote about it, and media and cameras were there. Many communists, skeptics, atheists, and freemasons showed up to mock the event and were stunned with what they saw...it was a sign for them....nothing happened to the sun...And three illiterate shepherd children made prophecies about serious future calamities like the rise of communism in Russia, the spread of communism throughout the world, and the coming of world war 2, and that the sky would be illuminated by an unknown light, prior to world war 2, it all happened...
(In spite of much study and investigation, scientists were unable to explain the great light that “struck fear into the hearts of millions” (F. Johnston). An unknown light in 1938 demands our attention – even today - Our Lady's Blue Army - World Apostolate of Fatima U.S.A.) that did take place, and they prophesied about the coming of their early death, all of which took place.


A sign was promised to all who showed up at a certain place, on a certain day, and thousands of eye-witnesses claim they saw the sun dance for approx. ten minutes, and then plunge down on the crowd. Many communists and atheists witnessed this and converted...it lead to religious fervor that was largely responsible for the fall of communism in Portugal.. How do you know there was no supernatural entity that gave these people a sign?...Were you there? Well, that is evidence. In fact, it changed the world in many ways, established a feast day that is celebrated by over a billion people, lead to movies, documentaries, many books as well...a massive shrine was erected there, the seers were canonized, and millions of pilgrims go there every years. Something very well may have happened there.

Maybe the creator did leave evidence for those people...you simply don't know.
th
th
th
th
th

Whenever there is supernatural phenomenon, there will be skeptics who come up with a clever rebuttal for it. People believe what they want to. There are sources that claim to "rebuttal" almost anything controversial or supernatural.
More miracles:
Infallible Catholic: Miraculous Image of Our Lady of Guadalupe
Miracle Hunter: Lourdes - List of Approved Miracles

The Medical committee at Lourdes is totally independent of the Church. They use skeptics on the committees, the rules are geared to control for remission. They screen our remission. They are required to use only the best medical evidence, to consult the doctors of the patients and they cannot make decisions without obtaining the medical records of those doctors. "They do examine the patients. It does have to be proven that the people were sick beforehand! they will only choose a case when they cannot find a naturalistic explaination."
cientific Evidence for Miracles page 1: examination of the Lourdes rules for miracel acceptence.

So, a single cell organism eventually managed to mutate into this...(sometimes a picture can speak volumes. Evolution is artistic):
th
th
th
th
th
th
th
th
th
th
th


You make it sound it like winning as an atheist, in general, is a difficult thing to do. Let me show you how simple it is.

You mention Fatima. Is it that the same Fatima that managed, somehow, to deviate the bullet directed at JP2? Well, apart from Fatima having some physical limitations concerning her power to operate on the momenta of bullets (just a few degrees), it seems to indicate that she is mobile. She seems to be able to perform miracles also in Rome, if she wants. Which should be very well expected by the mother of the creator of the Universe.

Why then do all those poor souls make the arduous trip to Fatima so that she can cure their bad backs, failing limbs, cancers or whatever, if she seems to be ubiquitous?

See, how simple it is to show the lack of logic of all of that? It is like finding logical flaws in a B-Movie, not very difficult really.

Ach, beati pauperes spiritu!

Ciao

- viole
 
Last edited:

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Okay, so there are fossils indicating that at one time in history there were homo sapiens that had different skulls
Those aren't all the skulls of homo sapiens, but of other members of the homo genus, earlier homo sapiens, and those closely related. Homo habilis, home neanderthalensis, home erectus, australothipicus, cro-magnun, homo heidelbergensis, and many more have been found.
 

Spiderman

Veteran Member
Okay @PopeADope buddy, if it's so important to you, why not actually study evolution properly? All you're doing is making yourself look utterly ignorant of basic science. That is not a good look on you.
Also have you never seen a pregnancy in action before? Never seen a cell duplicate, mutate and spread like wildfire?
Christ we were doing that in high school. They're called microscopes.
And I'm pretty sure Jurrassic Park explained how fossils work, never mind primary school level palaeontology.
A fetus in the womb doesn't mutate from one species into another.

I'm saying people should be open to the possibility that maybe 93% of the world doesn't have it all wrong...maybe there was a supernatural entity involved in the mutation...I see no evidence that there are scientific mechanisms mutating one species into another in any creature that is alive on earth today.

Do you?
 

Woberts

The Perfumed Seneschal
I'm saying people should be open to the possibility that maybe 93% of the world doesn't have it all wrong...maybe there was a supernatural entity involved in the mutation...I see no evidence that there are scientific mechanisms mutating one species into another in any creature that is alive on earth today.
At this point I'm just echoing what almost everyone else in the thread is, but you are severely misinformed on how evolution works.
 

Spiderman

Veteran Member
You make it sound it like winning as an atheist, in general, is a difficult thing to do. Let me show you how simple it is.

You mention Fatima. Is it that the same Fatima that managed, somehow, to deviate the bullet directed at JP2? Well, apart from Fatima having some physical limitations concerning her power to operate on the momenta of bullets (just a few degrees), it seems to indicate that she is mobile. She seems to be able to perform miracles also in Rome, if she wants. Which should be very well expected by the mother of the creator of the Universe.

Why then do all those poor souls make the arduous trip to Fatima so that she can cure their bad backs, failing limbs, cancers or whatever, if she seems to be ubiquitous?

See, how simple it is to show the lack of logic of all of that? It is like finding logical flaws in a B-Movie, not very difficult really.

Ach, beati pauperes spiritu!

Ciao

- viole
You haven't proven anything.

Supernatural healings are very rare.

That doesn't mean they don't happen.

There are plenty of testimonies from scientists and Doctors indicating that there is a creator. There are scientists who are a lot more educated than you who see evidence that God exists:

"Michio Kaku believes he has found evidence for God in his work. Kaku is a well respected scientist, who has helped pioneer String Theory of the universe, the idea that the universe is formed by many different dimensions of space and time.

String Theory is very complex and requires a significant background in physics to explain, but it is favored by many scientists because it succinctly answers many of the questions they have about the universe. Still, it does not provide a complete, satisfying equation for why the universe is as it is.


The problem with physics is that laws which explain why the universe works as it does on the macro level, do not apply at the micro level. Einstein's physics and quantum physics, have a gap between their explanations that scientists cannot yet explain. For example, why is it that tiny quantum particles can pop into and out of existence from nothing? String theory attempts to provide an answer to this question.


While working on String Theory, Kaku, discovered what he sees as evidence that the universe was created by an intelligence, rather than merely formed by random forces. He suggests he can explain it by what he calls, "primitive semi-radius tachyons." We do not yet have a succinct explanation of this idea from Kaku, other than he's referring to tachyons, which are theoretical particles that unbind particles from one another.

Without getting into the physics, Kaku concludes that we live in a Matrix-style universe, created by an intelligence.


"I have concluded that we are in a world made by rules created by an intelligence", he said. "Believe me, everything that we call chance today won't make sense anymore. To me it is clear that we exists in a plan which is governed by rules that were created, shaped by a universal intelligence and not by chance."

So does this mean Kaku now believes in God? Yes and no. Nowhere does he endorse an particular religious philosophy. Instead, he may be referring to Spinosa's God, a sort of deification of the laws of the universe themselves. Einstein came to a similar conclusion.
World renown scientist says he has found proof of God! We may be living the the 'Matrix' - Technology - News - Catholic Online
 

Spiderman

Veteran Member
Okay @PopeADope buddy, if it's so important to you, why not actually study evolution properly? All you're doing is making yourself look utterly ignorant of basic science. That is not a good look on you.
Also have you never seen a pregnancy in action before? Never seen a cell duplicate, mutate and spread like wildfire?
Christ we were doing that in high school. They're called microscopes.
And I'm pretty sure Jurrassic Park explained how fossils work, never mind primary school level palaeontology.
Aside from me calling those skulls homosapiens....(maybe they were, and we labeled them with a different name?)....
Which part of the OP was falsehood?
 

Spiderman

Veteran Member
Have you ever noticed how things like this are always vague? Outside the miracle or occurrence itself, there's really not a whole lot of information that is disclosed.

I'd be willing to bet the Catholic Church wouldn't let a medical doctor outside the Catholic faith touch or critically examine anything with a ten-foot pole.

Miracles observed by the masses well, I'm sure they would surely get stopped if they attempted to come closer and take a more critical look as if they don't want you to see things close up. I'm sure there was a healthy distance between on lookers and the responsible parties.

Interesting thing about things like Lourdes is their own mother who knew her children the best discounted them as having quite an imagination, which would be an understatement given there are so many facets to explaining away such things.

I think Catholics and other religious get a little bit too crazy over these kind of things for which the church is reluctant to expand upon given the hysterics that people show in light of such things.
There are non-Catholic skeptic Doctors who work at the medical Bureau at Lourdes
 

viole

Ontological Naturalist
Premium Member
I'm saying people should be open to the possibility that maybe 93% of the world doesn't have it all wrong...maybe there was a supernatural entity involved in the mutation...I see no evidence that there are scientific mechanisms mutating one species into another in any creature that is alive on earth today.

Do you?

Yes. It is called the theory of evolution by natural selection. And that has as much evidence as the curvature of this planet.

What 93% of the rest think is irrelevant. Some of them might believe that God looks like an elephant, others that God has a Uber service for prophets in the form of winged horses, others that he takes weekends off for humanity sins, others that black cats bring bad luck, that vaccines cause autism, or that homeopathy is effective, among other nonsense. Which makes the opinion of the masses totally unreliable. Personally, I would use the opinion of the masses as a safe counter indicator of what truth is.

Ciao

- viole
 
Last edited:

Spiderman

Veteran Member
Okay @PopeADope buddy, if it's so important to you, why not actually study evolution properly? All you're doing is making yourself look utterly ignorant of basic science. That is not a good look on you.
Also have you never seen a pregnancy in action before? Never seen a cell duplicate, mutate and spread like wildfire?
Christ we were doing that in high school. They're called microscopes.
And I'm pretty sure Jurrassic Park explained how fossils work, never mind primary school level palaeontology.
How about instead of repeatedly telling me I don't know how science works,
Somebody actually offers an explanation...

Perhaps you don't know or understand science either!...I've been waiting...we all came from a single cell organism at one time, right? For billions of years, single cell organisms had the planet to themselves right? Then they became complex multicellular creatures who were the first animals, and they were a major success....later on they became fish, reptiles, amphibians, insects, rodents, dinosaurs, mammals, birds, primates, and eventually you...and let me guess, you know how that happened...I'm sure we can see evidence of creatures in this state of mutating into another species...

How about instead of telling me I don't know science, somebody actually answers my questions!...truth is, I don't think you know!
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
I'm saying people should be open to the possibility that maybe 93% of the world doesn't have it all wrong...maybe there was a supernatural entity involved in the mutation...I see no evidence that there are scientific mechanisms mutating one species into another in any creature that is alive on earth today.
I don't remember her name, but the best explanation I saw came from a former member here. She explained it as a color spectrum, where clearly we can see red and clearly we can see orange, but where exactly does one become the other? The other best way of putting it comes from the late (and great) Lemmy Kilmister, who sang that evolution is "full of change that no one sees." And that is because these changes slowly add up, generation after generation after generation, eventually producing a new species.
 

Spiderman

Veteran Member
Yes. It is called the theory of evolution by natural selection. And that has as much evidence as the curvature of this planet.

What 93% of the rest think is irrelevant. Some of them might believe that God looks like an elephant, others that God has a Uber service for prophets in the form of winged horses, others that he takes weekends off for humanity sins, others that black cats bring bad luck, that vaccines cause autism, or that homeopathy is effective, among other nonsense. Which makes the opinion of the masses totally unreliable. Personally, I would use the opinion of the masses as a safe counter indicator of what truth is.

Ciao

- viole
Maybe Evolutionists are just as creative, imaginative, and insane as those theists you speak of.

There are strict limits to variation that are never crossed, something every breeder of animals or plants is aware of. Whenever variation is pushed to extremes by selective breeding (to get the most milk from cows, sugar from beets, bristles on fruit flies, or any other characteristic), the line becomes sterile and dies out. And as one characteristic increases, others diminish. But evolutionists want you to believe that changes continue, merging gradually into new kinds of creatures. This is where the imaginary part of the theory of evolution comes in. It says that new information is added to the gene pool by mutation and natural selection to create frogs from fish, reptiles from frogs, and mammals from reptiles.

I'm saying there is no evidence that scientific mechanisms are doing that! If we evolved from single cell organisms and fish, why aren't creatures showing signs of such that mutation??

Atheists never have an answer so they point to ancient fossils with a theory that can't be proven! They have no evidence of any creature on the planet that I know of that is in the processes of mutating into another species.

So, the only way this mutation could have taken place, would be through a scientific miracle. That would most likely involve a supernatural entity, because we see no possibility of science accomplishing this alone!
 
Top