namaskaram dyanaprajna ji :namaste
I'll agree that everyone views the teachings of Buddhism based on where they are on the path, even if it differs from others. I'll also admit that the teachings and scriptures are just fingers pointing at the moon.
jai jai , such fingers pointing at the moon are the kindness of our mothers who show us the world which we will later discover for ourselves .
But I can't figure how, if all we regard as the Buddha's teaching is just our own point of view, we can honestly call anything Buddhism, or why we don't just call everything Buddhism. Anatta is explained succinctly in the Pali canon, an is a cornerstone teaching of Buddhism. While it may be hard to understand outside of one's experience of it, we do have basic guidelines to follow regarding it, and to deny it is to deny the buddhadharma.
Allthough I have every respect for teachings which form the cornerstones of Buddhist traditions , I am looking back to the first turning of the wheel of law the four Noble Truths and 'the Noble Eight Fold Path' ...wherein the esence of Buddhist teachings are incapsulated in their most complete form .
The Noble Eight Fold Path encapsulates the essence of Buddhist practice , and is clearly devided into three forms of practice , ...the accumulation of wisdom , the practice of ethics and the training of concentration
many suttas held in the pali cannon are simply regarded to be discourses opon the truths contained within the first turning of the wheel of law , methods by which the monks were taught to understand the profound depth of the Four Noble Truths , this comes under the training of wisdom , but without the accompanying practice of ethics and the development of concentration this becomes interlectual learning alone , in which case we may easily become stuck in understanding through our own perspective alone , it is for this reason that it is advised that we continualy develop and broaden our experience through meditation .
constant meditation allows one to gain deeper insight through the gradual process of clensing the mind of defilements , without undergoing this process we grasp interlectualy at the teachings and run the risk of deepening ones sence of self rather than diminishing it .
in some respects we need to assimilate the teachings to the point where they become our own , untill we can apply the principles without the need to refer back to them as textural references , we need to be able to relate to the teachings in our own language , otherwise we spend our lives dualing with texts .
it is not a question of denying Buddha dharma , but more a process of becoming Buddha dharma , and to do this we have to go beyond the comfort of personal veiws and the temptation to use texts to support them .