Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I never understood occult Orders spilling all their info over the net, but you can certainly find links to my personal writings in the Luciferian DIR.
It most certainly is a conjecture, i.e an assumption, a presumption. Realistically it can't be anything else. Like KS said - in her pedantic way - "you can only presume you may have such a longevity."Projecting a completed Aim of THEM forward to 2036 when what we want to achieve will have cemented itself is not prophecy, it is not well-wishing, it is not faith, and it is not conjecture
In the context of esoteric philosophy, isn't this just something else you derived or copied from the O9A? Or if you prefer, you were inspired, again, by the O9A. Nothing wrong in that. Many people are or have been, though many don't acknowledge it. Or prefer not to acknowledge it because they want to sound 'original' and creative. Those so inspired include ODF, OSV, Temple ov Blood, etcetera etcetera.of people becoming obsessed with and adept with Forms
The ODF term is derived from the O9A insight role, and which O9A term and the idea of insight roles goes back to the 70s, long before the ODF existed. Therefore you (who probably weren't even born then or were in kindergarten) are just again being inspired by the O9A. Nothing wrong there.Yes, I should abandon the o9a's term Insight Role, perhaps ODF's Ingress Roles is better
Yet for 8 years you claimed to be O9A and claimed to run an O9A nexion. Therefore you were honor bound by the O9A logos, for that is one of the two things that make someone O9A. That you didn't consider yourself to be bound by that logos, and in public did things contrary to that logos, revealed you were - re the O9A at least - a fraud, one of the O9A pretendu crowd.I'm not bound to o9a's way of thinking, I'm not bound to o9a's leaders or self-appointed authorities, I'm not bound to a single thing
Quite so. Mr Hollow - as author of 'temple of them' material, whatever nym he uses - also loves to use 'barely cogent' terms (or should we say pretentious terms?) in his attempt to distinguish his material from that of the O9A. Terms such as Matrix-ridden Phyrm, and Undividual, and Phorces, and Phorms, and Supra Solidarity, and Unavir, and Themonomicon, and.... so on.For many this statement would be indicative enough in and of itself (and you are to be credited for such an honest admission, if nothing else) - yet it could also be paraphrased as the major difference as being "cogent" (per O9A) versus "barely cogent" (though the latter may be too emphatic a laud per the gabble you recently quoted.)
Again, quite so.That a certain person - namely the founder of a supposed Australian "esoteric order" allegedly formed by such person as referenced in the thread's title - inserts themselves into a forum for discussion of verifiable "religions" as a means to obtain credibility, a grasp at some outside verification in other words (when said person has been widely discredited otherwise and continues to be discredited here) is in itself highly indicative.
Oh good, there's more.
Waren_S_Gnobe said:I already said too much.
Interesting, and perhaps hinting at truth re the O9A which many seem to have overlooked.So, what is this other "ONA" to which our sinister star, Hollow, belongs, alongside with his not so anonymous friends here? It is a SPELL, casted upon this World by actual, esoteric and sinisterly-numinous Order of Nine Angles. A spell they were (un)fortunate to get caught into.
Anyway, thank you kindly for joining the forum and gracing us with your insight. Your revelations have been duly noted by all the prominent journalists here. Tomorrow these breaking news will appear in all the most popular tabloids.
Interesting, and perhaps hinting at truth re the O9A which many seem to have overlooked.
In the 1970s Anton Long set out to create a mythos, or - to use your rather opposite turn of phrase - cast a spell, a work of aeonic sorcery. Now, 40 years later that mythos is a reality; that spell is working its magick, in aeonic and other ways.
he "proclaimed a new logos", and ἀπεκύησε λόγῳ ἕτερον Νοῦν δημιουργόν [whose logos brought forth another perceiveration] as it says in the Pymander tractate.
As someone recently wrote, "a mythos is a living thing, and archetypal beyond a certain point, but always has some basis in reality
Of course, most ego-centric latter-day satanists cannot think beyond their own mortal life, given that their egoism, and carnality, is the raison d'être of their 'satanism'.
The saga of Mr Hollow makes a very interesting point vis-a-vis the O9A mythos, which is that he and others like him, via the internet or otherwise, can in no way detrimentally affect that mythos unless or until they have a sinisterly-numinous documented life akin to or surpassing that of Myatt. Because they don't have such a documented life, they are and remain and will be understood (at least by the sagacious) as irrelevant (and mostly plebeian) latter-day satanists or grumbling mundanes, or O9A pretenders spouting gabble. Or, more simply expressed, they lack gravitas, credibility, and so are (whatever they themselves and others might believe) currently powerless to affect a mythos (let alone create one), regardless of how many times they via the internet (or even in real life) drone on and on about the O9A and/or about their own 'esoteric philosophy'.
That latter-day satanists, especially, don't understand such a-temporal stuff about a mythos just shows how disconnected they are from what is really occult. Disconnected from sorcery ('spells'), especially aeonic ones. For even if some of them do believe in sorcery, it's invariably of the 'cause-and-effect' kind germane to their own egoistic ("I command the powers") weltanschauung.
So, A. Long is that important to them, after all? They are the best promoters of his life and work. They are stamped all over with AL AL AL AL AL AL AL They write books about him!! Inspired by him. Ha! Yes Him. They don't know it. But whenever you see "o9a" "ONA" sigil of o9a, anything peculiarly ONA in any way, and beyond in terms of Numinous, pathei-mathos, causal-acausal model of universe, Galactic Destiny, hermetics and its secrets in light of new aeon, some new and recognizable dimensions of NS and Islam etc.. - you can simply read it as "Anton Long". Those are all just his names. You get it? Some of you will..
That's a good example of ignoratio elenchi. An error which so many, it seems, make when discussing the O9A. The topic is the life of AL, the O9A mythos and its possible relation to AL, and the relation (if any) of said mythos to individuals such as Hollow Krispy.Any of you done some insight role?
Or, in O9A-speak, "because of causal-abstractions they cannot apprehend that which is living: the acausal and the sinisterly-numinous."because of egoblind they cannot connect to that which is living; to Life itself
It seems you have misunderstood both the 'importance' of AL and the O9A itself. AL's life is a documented example of O9A practice, of what the seven fold way means in real life, and thus grounds the mythos in reality, as does the axiom of the authority of individual judgement. Thus, "this axiom means that even the writings of Anton Long, and his esoteric philosophy, are only guides, a necessary beginning, and possess no ultimate authority." Source: The Authority Of Individual Judgement – Interpretation And MeaningWhat is their identity without o9a (AL)? Zero. Nothing
So, some people, or even many people - past and present - have a different take on life and acquiring wisdom than that outlined in O9A esoteric philosophy and praxis. So what? Aren't you making a spurious appeal to authority? The O9A way is just one way out of tens of thousands of different ways, past and present. That O9A way may be useful for a few, that's all. As AL wrote in a 1990 letter to Aquino, the O9A does not claim to be a peer organization with a claim to some sort of 'authority'. [Cue the axiom of individual authority, again.]I think that quote from one sage can be useful here: "An Individual does not really become wise because of what happens to him; he becomes wise only when something inside of him understands the meaning of that experience."
Satan's Right Hand Man said:If ONA was fresh cow dung, Anna Banana Czereda is like a fly that just loves to hover around you guys. She's never far.
Waren_S_Gnobe said:Still having nothing better to do with your life , I see..
Consider yourself ignored eternally.
That's quite an interesting and indicative comment considering the number of posts you've made in this thread and all other ONA related threads here.
Do you know what a "White Wedding" is Anna?Next time you decide to take a shot at someone, take care you don't blow out your brains like Kurt Cobain.
That's a good example of ignoratio elenchi. An error which so many, it seems, make when discussing the O9A. The topic is the life of AL, the O9A mythos and its possible relation to AL, and the relation (if any) of said mythos to individuals such as Hollow Krispy.
Or, in O9A-speak, "because of causal-abstractions they cannot apprehend that which is living: the acausal and the sinisterly-numinous."
A similar sort of thing, using various terminologies, goes right back to ancient mystical traditions, including Hellenic hermeticism and gnosticism. So, that sort of understanding, O9A included, is really nothing new.
It seems you have misunderstood both the 'importance' of AL and the O9A itself. AL's life is a documented example of O9A practice, of what the seven fold way means in real life, and thus grounds the mythos in reality, as does the axiom of the authority of individual judgement. Thus, "this axiom means that even the writings of Anton Long, and his esoteric philosophy, are only guides, a necessary beginning, and possess no ultimate authority." Source: The Authority Of Individual Judgement Interpretation And Meaning etc.
So, some people, or even many people - past and present - have a different take on life and acquiring wisdom than that outlined in O9A esoteric philosophy and praxis. So what? Aren't you making a spurious appeal to authority? The O9A way is just one way out of tens of thousands of different ways, past and present. That O9A way may be useful for a few, that's all. As AL wrote in a 1990 letter to Aquino, the O9A does not claim to be a peer organization with a claim to some sort of 'authority'. [Cue the axiom of individual authority, again.]
Hi. I'd like introduce the Temple of Them. We are eight people with various magical backgrounds and formed in 2006. We are theist and worship forces we call THEM. We operate out of Australia and recently formed the Australian Satanic Organization Victoria for real world meetings and activities. We each have our own system of magic and philosophy and have written dozens of books and thousands of pages on the occult. We've been published in various occult magazines by publishers as well as run our own book distributory - but offer hundreds of essays, images and materials freely from our wordpress. We support dozens of bands, artists, authors and lhp groups. We are presently working on a mammoth tome of our last two decades work - encompassing work written prior to taking the name of the Temple - that is a lovecraftian styled grimoire with every one of its 600 pages illustrated, called the Themonomicon. What we do is detailed in our work called Abracadabra and a short movie called Form 101 available from our wordpress. We look forward to fruitful discussion. ISS/h