Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I tend to think Bahai's are not that pronounced."Basically councils of nine Baha’is would run everything in a totalitarian democracy with voting limited to Baha’is. All nations would be either principalities (under a Baha’i prince) or electorates (under a Baha’i elector)." -- Source
Is this true?
I don't worry about Bahai. There is something totalitarian going on worldwide now, that worries me much more."Basically councils of nine Baha’is would run everything in a totalitarian democracy with voting limited to Baha’is. All nations would be either principalities (under a Baha’i prince) or electorates (under a Baha’i elector)." -- Source
Is this true?
"Basically councils of nine Baha’is would run everything in a totalitarian democracy with voting limited to Baha’is. All nations would be either principalities (under a Baha’i prince) or electorates (under a Baha’i elector)." -- Source
Is this true?
Some truth but you are presenting it in a negative way."Basically councils of nine Baha’is would run everything in a totalitarian democracy with voting limited to Baha’is. All nations would be either principalities (under a Baha’i prince) or electorates (under a Baha’i elector)." -- Source
Is this true?
Apparently not. Or at least, I can't find much of this at the relevant link: Home"Basically councils of nine Baha’is would run everything in a totalitarian democracy with voting limited to Baha’is. All nations would be either principalities (under a Baha’i prince) or electorates (under a Baha’i elector)." -- Source
Is this true?
It's a daydream. Daydreams aren't reality, and are unlikely to come true. Doesn't mean one can't dream."Basically councils of nine Baha’is would run everything in a totalitarian democracy with voting limited to Baha’is. All nations would be either principalities (under a Baha’i prince) or electorates (under a Baha’i elector)." -- Source
Is this true?
(Sorry for the shocking language.)Some truth but you are presenting it in a negative way.
The truth is that the Baha'is envision a day when the entire world will willingly come together under the dispensation of Baha'u'llah. A Baha'i Administrative Order will replace the crumbling institutions of the past.
The details on how this will work out are to be revealed when the time comes.
But not true.Disturbing.
No, that is not true."Basically councils of nine Baha’is would run everything in a totalitarian democracy with voting limited to Baha’is. All nations would be either principalities (under a Baha’i prince) or electorates (under a Baha’i elector)." -- Source
Is this true?
You say it is only "some truth" But your post does not contradict or correct anything that the author said. Which statements were false? Or partially false? And in what way?Some truth but you are presenting it in a negative way.
The truth is that the Baha'is envision a day when the entire world will willingly come together under the dispensation of Baha'u'llah. A Baha'i Administrative Order will replace the crumbling institutions of the past.
13No, that is not true.
The truth is more like this, but there is a lot more to it:
#5 George-ananda, Today at 9:40 AM
"Basically councils of nine Baha’is would run everything in a totalitarian democracy with voting limited to Baha’is. All nations would be either principalities (under a Baha’i prince) or electorates (under a Baha’i elector)." -- Source
Is this true?
It is nobody's daydream. It is a complete misrepresentation of the vision of Baha'u'llah.It's a daydream. Daydreams aren't reality, and are unlikely to come true. Doesn't mean one can't dream.
I am not up on this aspect of the Baha'i Faith, so I have asked some other more knowledgeable Baha'is to jump in, lest I put my foot in my mouth.You say it is only "some truth" But your post does not contradict or correct anything that the author said. Which statements were false? Or partially false? And in what way?
Fair enough.I am not up on this aspect of the Baha'i Faith, so I have asked some other more knowledgeable Baha'is to jump in, lest I put my foot in my mouth.
Okay, I will make a stab at it.You say it is only "some truth" But your post does not contradict or correct anything that the author said. Which statements were false? Or partially false? And in what way?
I am not up on this aspect of the Baha'i Faith, so I have asked some other more knowledgeable Baha'is to jump in, lest I put my foot in my mouth.
No thanks. You'll just put your foot in your mouth, then blame me for it. As per usual.Okay, I will make a stab at it.