• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Baltimore police charged in Freddy Gray death

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I saw that. The general consensus is that the prosecutors may have jumped the gun.
Aye, the accused must've felt he had a strong legal case because he opted for a bench trial.
(It's what innocent people with evidence & the law on their side tend to do.)
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
I don't trust this STATE'S ATTORNEY to be fair and unbiased at all.
Being biased is a part of the job description of an attorney. It's the role of the judges and juries to remain unbaised, and the job of the lawyer is to win.
 

freethinker44

Well-Known Member
Being biased is a part of the job description of an attorney. It's the role of the judges and juries to remain unbaised, and the job of the lawyer is to win.
The prosecutors should be unbiased as well. Defense lawyers can be biased, but the government's only interest should be getting justice, both for victims and falsely accused.
 

freethinker44

Well-Known Member
I don't think anyone actually believed they would be convicted though.
You know your system is corrupt when them just being charged with a crime is a huge victory.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I don't think anyone actually believed they would be convicted though.
You know your system is corrupt when them just being charged with a crime is a huge victory.
This wasn't a case where it was clear the cops were actually guilty.
The standard to convict is a high one. This doesn't mean there was
no wrongdoing though....it just didn't rise to the level of criminal acts.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
That doesn't make up for the epic fail of the prosecution team however.
Could the officer now counter-sue for malicious prosecution?
That is extremely difficult.
Consider.....
Courts are reluctant to allow any suits or prosecutions which would discourage suits or prosecutions.
The justice industrial complex is all about churning as much activity as possible. I even heard
lawyer in court this year actually make the argument to the judge (who bought it) that there must
be no compensation to defendants in frivolous suits, because otherwise no one would sue.
Prosecutors would be quite hesitant in their jobs if the court required them to be responsible.
 

freethinker44

Well-Known Member
That doesn't make up for the epic fail of the prosecution team however.
Could the officer now counter-sue for malicious prosecution?
I don't think they have a case for malicious prosecution.
They weren't treated worse than the general public would have been treated.
It did seem like they charged some cops who weren't responsible for his death, but if it had been a group of non-LEOs it would have been the same charges at a minimum, probably more. And they probably would have been convicted.
 
Top