• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Banning ‘Woke’ Words in State Documents, Arkansas Governor Signs Executive Order

icehorse

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
Revoltingest said:
You should infer that I value their rights,
but that I don't believe they're being
violated by cis & tans women sharing
lavatories.
Click to expand...
Millions and millions of women disagree with you - but of course, you don't seem to care about that, you're too busy signalling your virture.
 
SkepticThinker

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
icehorse said:
Another misogynistic voice heard from, thank you for your virtue signalling opinion.
Click to expand...
You weren't able to explain how your last accusation of misogyny applied to my post, but let's see if you can do it for this one.

Also, please point out where I've virtue signaled.
 
W

wellwisher

Well-Known Member
We Never Know said:
Wouldn't bother me if they banned "cis" also


"Arkansas Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders signed an executive order on Thursday prohibiting “woke, anti-women words” in state documents.

It’s the left that decided that ‘woman’ is a dirty word,” Sanders said at the signing. “It’s the left that decided we needed basic biology and basic grammar along with it......

The executive order prohibits all state offices, departments, boards, and commissions from using the words and terms Governor Sanders described as “ridiculous.” Effective immediately, “exclusionary and sexist terms” are to be replaced with “accurate, female-affirming alternatives.”

The newly banned terminology includes “menstruating person,” “menstruating people,” “birth-giver,” “womxn,” “womyn,” “laboring person,” “birthing person,” “human milk,” “chestfeeding,” “body fed,” and “person fed.”

Instead, the state must use alternatives such as “woman,” “women,” “birth mom,” “breast milk,” “breastfeeding,” “breast fed,” “pregnant women,” “pregnant mom,” or “birth mom.”

Click to expand...
As far as cis and trans, the Left copied and perverted the scientific meaning of cis and trans in chemistry. This fad was never about being true to science, but about an establishment of a Lefty religion.

Cis and trans, in chemistry, is a way to characterize isomers, which are chemicals with the same formula, but which are different in spatial arrangement. Trans shows the H on opposite sides, which is more analogous to male and female are opposite.Men are from Mars and Women are from Venus; farthest apart

Cis would actually refer to the transsexual, since male(DNA) and female(surgery) are on same side; one person. Liberalism tried to redefine clear science language, backwards, to game the system; pretend artificial is natural and scientific. The term cis and trans was there way before transgender. Trans meant Transitional, unrelated to cis and trans.

Geometric_cis-trans_isomers_in_alkenes-1.png


It makes no sense to redefine scientific terms that have been used for a century to accommodate less that 4% of the population which are mostly Leftist, and then force everyone to obey. Sanders is returning her state back to Democracy; 96%, and sanity and away from the con artists. This is a good start. Democracy is majority rule; 96%, not Liberal minority rule; 4%.

This entire fad is a money maker for plastic surgeons and drug companies, who kick back to Lefty politicians who make laws to force feed this. This will do long term harm to young people, and nobody will be held accountable. Maybe we need an accountability law, so the predators get their due, if and when the crap hits the fan. Doctors can lose their license and those who took donations or forced the issue can be sued in court for damages.

Say a person saw their ideal body image, with a small nose, instead of a different sexual organ. They look in the mirror and their DNA based nose, is not the one they want, for vanity. or for good feelings about themself. They like the nose of a young starlet. Should that plastic surgery also be allowed, under the trans umbrella? Psychologically, it would come from a similar mental image schema that voids the choice of the DNA, with one of a different self image option. How about breast augmentation, tummy tucks, and fixing Asian eyes to look semi-European? This is very exotic. If that simple change can make some people feel whole, instead of a large nosed person in a small nosed body image, should the tax payer pay for it? Plastic Surgeons will say, yes.

These others cosmetic surgeries are legal, but they are all called cosmetics surgery, and not covered under insurance or government hand outs. We should either do them all, or none. Only allowing the one Lefty chosen child is not democracy, but favoritism. I am for anyone to make such choices, if they think then need to. But you have to find your own funding and not make yourself a burden to others; elected and not life saving. All the rest do that now, so it it possible. Paying for your own will assure there is an adult in the room, for such major decisions.
 
Last edited:
Revoltingest

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
wellwisher said:
As far as cis and trans, the Left copied and perverted the scientific meaning of cis and trans in chemistry. This fad was never about being true to science, but about an establishment of a Lefty religion.
Click to expand...
That seems odd. We see primarily Christian fundies
imposing a bizarre biblical view that there are only
2 immutable sexes, despite scientific evidence of
greater complexity. Yet recognizing this complexity,
& accommodating people's needs is "religion" &
"misogyny". Go figure.
 
Shadow Wolf

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Revoltingest said:
We'll need a huge combination of public lavatories
to accommodate them all, eg, straight furverts,
gay Christians, bi-curious foot fetishists.
Click to expand...
And don't forget those who are terrified of black people, red heads amd have issues with people using their left hand.
 
icehorse

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
SkepticThinker said:
Just like you don't seem to care about the millions and millions of women who disagree with you. Me, being one of them. :shrug:
Click to expand...

Hey, anyone can be a misogynist.

So let me ask you this, let's say that only 47% of women are concerned about a sex-based pay gap. Would your argument be that we can ignore those women?
 
icehorse

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
Revoltingest said:
That seems odd. We see primarily Christian fundies
imposing a bizarre biblical view that there are only
2 immutable sexes, despite scientific evidence of
greater complexity.
Click to expand...

- You apparently need identity politics to make your point? hmmm...
- Two sexes is science, immutability is science, sex is baked into every cell of the body, it's not just genitalia.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top