Biden is very dangerous in his speeches

[Koldo]

Putin is allowed to use such words but Biden is not?

Why are you asking me this?

 

[stvdv]

We have no control over that.

True, you don't have control over that

 

[stvdv]

I'm not a US citizen, so I have no skin in this game. But if I were, I would probably expect higher standards from the democratically elected leader of my country, than I would from a corrupt kleptocrat, who effectively shredded his own country's constitution in order to cling to power.

I agree...that's my feeling too. I don't expect too much goodness from: Xi, Kim nor Putin

 

[stvdv]

Some Biden-words examples which indicate he let his emotions overpower him...not so good for a president

I agree with Tucker here what he explains
It's not healthy that they need to contradict what Biden says, and more than once in less than 3 days. Next President better be not older than 65 years IMO

Tucker: Biden can't regulate his emotions

 

[Truthseeker]

That is true, that media inflates things, but still he should not say these things, esp. now Zelenski has said he might agree to Ukraine being neutral, NOT part of NATO, which is what Putin has been saying for many years, and 1 of the reasons he started the war

Better be careful now what to say, because once red buttons get pressed it can't be stopped

Biden has a history of being a little careless in his comments sometimes.

 

[Truthseeker]

help Putin retain power by exploiting the
claim (however false) of an existential threat.

That's such a good point I hadn't thought of. No doubt this is being played for all its worth in the Putin controlled media.

 

[Truthseeker]

I would not be surprise if that was actually what Biden is hoping. It would not be the first time that America interferes with other regimes.

Yes, America has interfered with other regimes, but I don't think America has that capability to do that in this case. The one that particularly comes to mind is putting the Shah back in power in Iran, which indirectly led to the present deplorable situation in Iran. What's your reading of Biden? Do you think he would do that if he could?

 

[Truthseeker]

It turns out that Soros was adopted by a Nazi...in Hungary .
So his family taught him certain values.

Nope. It doesn't say that in Wikipedia. I trust Wikipedia.

 

[Truthseeker]

He was adopted of course.
Interview: George Soros Admits He Has No Sense of Guilt to Profiting from Nazi War Crimes (Video) - Freedom Outpost

How do you know this is reliable? There is misinformation out there. I would think that this interview by Steve Croft on CBS would have surfaced before now. It was in plain sight then, wouldn't you think?

edit: looking around this site is very much slanted towards the right. Try to find reliable information, or look at at things from more than one side is what I would suggest.

 

[F1fan]

The red words are very stupid, as if America, which Biden represents, is King of the World who decides how other countries should be ruled and by whom. And that is just 1 example of the few I heard in the past few days, but this one says enough...

Ukraine War: Joe Biden says Vladimir Putin 'cannot remain in power'

I'm not convinced. You didn't offer a coherent argument, just claims. Perhaps you're just being emotional.

 

[stvdv]

I'm not convinced. You didn't offer a coherent argument, just claims. Perhaps you're just being emotional.

Nothing wrong with Biden's "Putin can not remain in power"

As Putin probably will die

BUT that is not how most people interpreted his words

FYI: I'm not the "emotional type". Biden was called "emotional" by Tucker (my post #44) and also by others though. True I did not offer coherent argument, just my opinion. Others can make up their own mind whether Biden remarks were coherent, emotional or not.

For me this is too obvious, hence I feel no need to offer coherent arguments, as Biden is not coherent himself, or do you disagree with "Biden has been not quite coherent lately? "

 

[Estro Felino]

How do you know this is reliable? There is misinformation out there. I would think that this interview by Steve Croft on CBS would have surfaced before now. It was in plain sight then, wouldn't you think?

edit: looking around this site is very much slanted towards the right. Try to find reliable information, or look at at things from more than one side is what I would suggest.

Because I have watched that interview.
Despite Soros' desperate attempts to cover it up...I have saved it.
He admits all those things.

 

[metis]

And I know about narcissistic anger outburst. A narcissist can be trigged suddenly by little things.
Better be careful with narcissists or worse. Better be diplomatic, especially if the narcissist has more than 6000 nukes at his disposal.

Putin has a record of being intelligent but calculating, although we don't know for certain what his mood is right now beyond his undoubtedly being disappointed. The reality is that Biden was saying what so many others throughout the free world has been saying for decades now about him.

 

[metis]

Some Biden-words examples which indicate he let his emotions overpower him...not so good for a president

I agree with Tucker here what he explains
It's not healthy that they need to contradict what Biden says, and more than once in less than 3 days. Next President better be not older than 65 years IMO

Tucker: Biden can't regulate his emotions

You gotta be kidding! Tucker has severe cases of diarrhea of the mouth, and yet you agree with him?

 

[stvdv]

Putin has a record of being intelligent but calculating, although we don't know for certain what his mood is right now beyond his undoubtedly being disappointed.

The reality is that Biden was saying what so many others throughout the free world has been saying for decades now about him.

I also think that Putin is smart, not delusional, although many on RF think he is delusional. I see him more like a dangerous, easily angered narcissist at best (but I have totally no proof of that). Bombing civilians is demonic, and such people, easily go to the next level (nukes) I think when triggered too much.

What Biden said is understandable, seeing Putin kill innocent people. I just hope the West does not trigger a narcissistic anger attack in Putin, making him use nukes. That's all.

 

[stvdv]

You gotta be kidding! Tucker has severe cases of diarrhea of the mouth, and yet you agree with him?

Not with everthing he says, but some things I think he is spot on about Putin, whereas mainstream media is not willing to see it.

But anyway it's a tricky situation with 6000+ nukes. Because we should not show fear, narcs like that and can get even more violent with their grandiose view of themselves (Putin started the war this way... I offered them to surrender to me...).

But we should also not drive him crazy

I am glad I don't have to make these decisions.

 

[F1fan]

Nothing wrong with Biden's "Putin can not remain in power"

I'm on the record saying it was bad judgment. I've also said that media (remember, the right wing hates media for being too dramatic at times) has exaggerated this comment and that has made the comment more inflammatory than it is. Who in the West disagrees with the off the cuff comment? I don't as one, I think Putin should resign or his inner circle remove him by whatever means for the sake of Russia. Putin has worn out his effectiveness as the dictator of Russia, and reports suggest he is poorly informed by his military advisors due to fear. That is a bad way to run a government and a war.

Biden is an older and more emotional man, but I think despite the occasional error he's doing a good job in managing the role of the USA in regards to NATO and the war. I saw Republican strategist Rick Tyler interviewed and his suggestion was for Biden to invite some conservative advisors who have experience from the Reagan era to help navigate the current affairs, and I think it is a good idea.

As Putin probably will die

He's unlikely to die from outsiders. Putin has a highly loyal security detail. If he's going to be assassinated it will be insiders. The sections are designed to put pressure on the people of Russia which will create pressure on the government to end the war.

BUT that is not how most people interpreted his words

Faulty interpretation is a human thing. Deliberate disinformation is political. Biden has clarified his comments and if that is not good enough then the problem is political assumptions biased against Biden.

FYI: I'm not the "emotional type".

Of course not.

Yet there are subconscious emotions that are not worn on our sleeves, and those are the type more relevant to attitudes and biases we carry along as baggage. We are often unaware of these feelings until they are expressed in certain statements, just like Biden can do. Like we all do.

Biden was called "emotional" by Tucker (my post #44) and also by others though. True I did not offer coherent argument, just my opinion. Others can make up their own mind whether Biden remarks were coherent, emotional or not.

Valid opinions will have a coherent argument to support them. the reason so many opinions are seen as unwarranted is because there is not a coherent argument, or contrary to facts. Tucker is an example of emotional opinions and incoherent rants. He appeals to people who think in a similar sloppy manner: opinions that 'feel good" but are not reasoned.

For me this is too obvious, hence I feel no need to offer coherent arguments, as Biden is not coherent himself, or do you disagree with "Biden has been not quite coherent lately? "

[
This appears to be a set of emotional and biased comments, not a coherent opinion. This appears to be very much Tuckerisms. Without a coherent argument they aren't worth anything.

As for my opinion about Biden, we all can see that Biden has lost a step or two from his years as VP. But if we are going to compare coherency from trump as president (two guys about the same age) Biden makes vastly fewer gaffs. Just review trump's comments about taking bleach to kill the Covid virus, or how trump lied about Covid being a threat to the USA. Trump lost the 2020 election due to his badly mismanaged pandemic response, and he made incoherent and false statements at most every public speaking event. Frankly I keep looking for Biden to screw up when he gives a speech and he's done a pretty good job.

I'll say I'm glad he's decided not to run again. The USA and Europe is lucky that we elected Biden and not trump again. We needed a competent leader who understand their responsibilities to the USA and to NATO. Who knows what sort of indifference to NATO and Ukraine trump would be showing us.[/QUOTE]

 

[metis]

... whereas mainstream media is not willing to see it.

Just for the record, Fox is part of the "mainstream media" even though it claims it's not.

 

[Kooky]

Putin is allowed to use such words but Biden is not?

I don't think anybody has the power to "allow" or "disallow" any of this.