ImmortalFlame
Woke gremlin
Exactly. They did something to stop it rather than just shrugging and saying "Well, civilization will survive, so whatever".There was something done. The allies won the war ending the holocaust.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Exactly. They did something to stop it rather than just shrugging and saying "Well, civilization will survive, so whatever".There was something done. The allies won the war ending the holocaust.
Actually the universe is essentially my 'god' a force based on dynamics actually.. I just don't attribute any human quality to it because we are clearly not the center by which the universe is thought to be there for the purpose of revolving around humankind.You mean, you and I are.
Have you no children or grandchildren?
Don't you care about them?
Oh, no. Of course, I forgot.
"Science" is your god.
Despite the fact, the use of scientific knowledge has got us into this climate-crisis, you think it can get us out of it.
The chance would be a fine thing.
Mankind is violent in his love of wealth.
If we don't die due to harsher climate, the bombs will do it.
I find your indifference to a future Dark Age with millions of deaths due to climate induced disasters and social unrest.... unsettling.Civilization will still be around. People will adjust and adapt. That's how nature works.
I guess it all depends on triage.Exactly. They did something to stop it rather than just shrugging and saying "Well, civilization will survive, so whatever".
No. Indifference isn't actually a monster nor a saint. It's why I adopted twilight as part of my avatars name.I find your indifference to a future Dark Age with millions of deaths due to climate induced disasters and social unrest.... unsettling.
Do you promote such an attitude of selfishness?..i usually figure people by nature tend not to do anything unless something isdirectly affecting themselves prompting actions..
Demonstrably false.So far it's the boy crying wolf with no wolf presenting itself as a real danger.
I just live with the way nature works of which we all are a part of. I don't promote nor digress on matters in general anymore, and oftentimes cycle my views and actions as conditions and circumstances allow.Do you promote such an attitude of selfishness?
Demonstrably false.
I might not agree with the majority when it comes to solutions, but ignoring the vast majority of scientists who are warning of its seriousness, along with evidence is very telling.
i.e. you'd rather carry on with your privileged life
That is not what I see.While I find the scientific community a valuable 'canary' in the mines, the fact is, there are still ongoing debates and not any full consensus as of yet..
Well that's good. Now is the matter of convincing the public with actual facts and not theoretical models.That is not what I see.
There are not many scientists in the world who think that climate-change isn't a serious issue, and most govts. are taking notice.
I agree... what I was saying was there is a 200 years supply so if we don't have all the answers in 15 years, we can still make it happen.I don’t think we have 200 years to address the global climate crisis.
And by we, I mean humanity.
I agree... what I was saying was there is a 200 years supply so if we don't have all the answers in 15 years, we can still make it happen.
We don't have to put humanity's need on hold with exorbitant taxes and prices to fix the problem.
If your worry is radioactive material, then I have bad news about oil and gas:Atomic dust on my eggs for breakfast?
Hmmm.. "small is beautiful".
In a recent interview with CNN, Biden commented on Saudi Arabia's cut in oil production and said there would be "consequences" for the move:
Biden says Putin 'totally miscalculated' by invading Ukraine but is a 'rational actor' | CNN Politics
He met the murderous leader of a country with an atrocious human rights record, but the "consequences" apparently required a cut in oil production that should, first and foremost, be Saudi Arabia's rather than Biden's call to make.
This mentality that other sovereign countries should bow down to American interests is as outdated as it is arrogant. It should come as no surprise that an increasing number of developing and third-world countries are aligning themselves with China instead of the US.
At least he has realized that the relationship of the US with Saudi Arabia is overdue for reconsideration. Perhaps the US will no longer keep propping up the disgracefully tyrannical and brutal House of Saud just to maintain American benefits from Saudi oil.
He said that this move was borne out of necessity because of the current situation, so it would have made 0 sense if he stuck with the original plan at this time.As for how Saudi Arabia increasing production of oil for the U.S. fits into Biden's Green Energy solution for the planet... it's just another example of Biden Building Backwards. It doesn't fit into a Green Energy solution for the planet.