Nuclear war is not occuring (at the moment, climate change is
The problem is the preponderance of data, connected to climate change on earth, is from Geological evidence. This data which tells us nature has done this all by herself, many many times, over the last billion years. It is natural for the earth to cycle between hot and cold, and then cold to hot, with noise in the middle. The earth is still warming out of the last (cold) ice age.
Manmade data, even if real, is only one unique occurrence, that has yet to compete its first cycle. Man did not have the capacity to do what is claimed with CO2, until the past 120 years. So why run with the minimal data from an experiment still in progress? Why the exception to the normal approach of science, which normally places the preponderance of the data, first? This is a yellow flag. Science preaches to us every day, but seems to ignore this giant departure. Why is that? Why were the naturalist censored and targeted? How did their silencing help change precedent?
This change of policy leads to another problem for me. Ever since Trump won in 2016, the Democrats and Political left, who are pushing this one unfinished manmade experiment, have repeatably demonstrated how much they will lie, to get their way. Does anyone remember the Russian Collusion delusion scam, that seemed so real; experts, but turned out to be a scam? It was so in your face. It was like seeing a very attractive girl, until one day she was without makeup. You suddenly realize this was only an illusion of being pretty. Normally they hide their scams with their two faces. But Trump seemed to bring out an over reaction that lifted the veil. This told us much about hidden agendas and how there have no morals, when it comes to power.
They have a credibility problem, that they have never rectified. They only circled the wagons, went on radio silence, and change the scam, so the spoiled scan was forgotten. Twitter now shows how they will shut down the opposition, via cheating, censorship, shadows banding and lying. In the early days of manmade climate changes the Left targeted anyone who has a different opinion, all the way to getting people fired for not carrying their water. How can you trust such a consensus?
The Left base seems to have no clue, but it will accept with any narrative given. It has demonstrated a lock step tendency, to blindly defend, even when their scams fall apart. Unless they are told to use radio silence, to hide failed scams. Remember the Hunter Biden Laptop that was called Russian Disinformation that used censorship to promote a lie? What makes their global warming plans different? As shown, Biden will turn on a dime and say anything; tell the base what they want to hear.
The same political party see nothing wrong with the huge US debt and deficits, which impact world trade and world economic health. They have no clue if their plan will do harm, since their sales pitch is based on fear and the lessor of two evils; we have an existential threat, blah blah blah. If we extrapolate their vision, they will break the bank, even without sufficient science to back it up. As one of their own leaders once said, "Never let a good disaster or (perceived disaster), go to waste".
Until the Left can prove they are not lying, I would prefer not go along with their sleazy bonehead leaders who have not apologized for their previous the scams or even the harm they did to their Human props; General Flynn. I do not see this ending well. They lack science precedent and lack a handle on economic principles. It is about power and the steal.
I would bet on natural climate change since this science is about hard data, and not fuzzy dice with an unfinished first experiment. The glaciers had already melt over a 1800 miles worth; NYC to the Arctic Circle, before the boneheads got involved. We are supposed to ignore this natural melting, and assume nature handed off to the political Left, and man is now in total control? This rubs me as wrong, even if their base will buy that farm.
Newest data has shown that the core of the earth, which is 1/3 of the total mass of the earth, had been rotating faster than the surface. Now the data shows it has nearly, stop. Where is the brake heat going? Does it impact the surface and will that cause the ocean to release CO2? It hard to belief a little CO2 can be worse than the brake heat from something as massive as ten moons.
We would better off preparing for possible migrations, but without any disruption to global economies. We need to keep the world economies running strong to meet the challenges for all, and not just the Elitists. The Lefties assume they will be running the show. Leftist know little about how to fortify the world economy, with minimal pain for the masses. The current world inflation and pain was caused by the Democrats in the USA, with only oil. It shows how much damage they can do with even one of their self serving bonehead calls. Multiple that by ten.
The root cause is statistical modeling. Politicians use the same math allowing them to fudge. Is manmade climate change advanced enough to do without fudge math so we can break the bridge with politics or is it too late of that area of political science?
