So you'd be perfectly comfortable with a corporation destroying your property rights.....
You got that from my posts?
Nah....I'm a big fan of property rights....but not straw men.
.....but lemme guess, the government--which gives those very rights power--had better not go near them?
We don't need "big" government to secure our constitutional rights.
And waah, waah about Obama. The nation spoke, and they spoke clearly. If you want a nation with more guns and less government oversight, Somalia awaits you.
You're taking this off topic, since the OP asked which we preferred. You like big gov.
I like small gov. You might as well get used to our differences rather than getting all huffy.
Speaking of oil and profits!
And who waged the war? Bush & Obama.
If Haliburton started it, at least I could boycott the company
Nobody is preventing you from voting third-party. Why a third-party candidate stands little chance of winning most offices is a discussion best saved for another thread.
Of course I'm able to vote for a 3rd party, but you Big Two types dominate to the extent that no one else wins.
Thus, I've no power to ditch the usual Pub or Dem. But with big companies, I can boycott them. Is this concept
so hard to accept?
What games?
...I am sure you know what externalities are and the fact that corporations are able to dodge their effects left and right, while third parties suffer. The Mayflower oil spill is an excellent example of this. Better regulations and enforcement--which I'm guessing you oppose--would have decreased the risk of this sort of catastrophe from happening.
Oh, dear....I don't seem to be making any headway explaining my preferences.
Perhaps you're just too wedded to big gov to see any merit in the alternative.