Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Well, I suppose having gender reassignment surgery is one way to do it. Or being reincarnated.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Perhaps in the Biblical sense. Otherwise lust is well, just lust.
^ This.Dumb?
Guys, guys, slow down. Now, there are sources imply it is unhealthy and and uncontrollable, and others imply it is healthy and normal, but both views say it is a sexual desire.
Lust is an emotion or feeling of intense desire in the body. The lust can take any form such as the lust for sex, lust for expensive objects (extravagance) or the lust for power. It can take such mundane forms as the lust for food as distinct from the need for food. Lust is a psychological force producing intense wanting for an object, or circumstance fulfilling the emotion.[1] (source: Wikipedia: Lust)
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blo...e/201205/whats-wrong-little-lust-in-your-lifeWhat source says it is "healthy?"
Lust can be great. Absolutely fabulous. Terrific. It can get you moving with the thumping persistence of the Energizer Bunny. It can wake you out of a physical slumber and suddenly remind you of the wonders of the flesh-the sheer joy of having fingertips and eyelashes and a body.
...
But it doesn't have to; those heels can be kicked up in a dance or thrown off at the end of a long day. Lust can be as much a victory as a vice, as much part of comfortable love as of sizzling intimacy, if we learn how to do it right.
Well, I suppose having gender reassignment surgery is one way to do it. Or being reincarnated.
What source says it is "healthy?"
That is true. I was raised in a Catholic household, and the RCC teaches that lust even within marriage is 'sinful.'Yes, Moreover, it can be construed as lust even within the strictures of marriage.
@Smart_Guy - regarding your question as to context...lol ''Born again virgin'' meaning...it's a mindset. You are not physically a virgin, but you are making a commitment to not having sex of any kind outside of marriage...until you are married.
The lovely Shadow Wolf answered your question
And besides, without lust, how can people have children? People wouldn't just decide to have sex to have children. Lust pushes them to do that. Is having children not healthy?
Then I'd say it is a good thing.
In this case, all divorced then remarried devoted Muslims are born-again virgins
@Smart_Guy - regarding your question as to context...lol ''Born again virgin'' meaning...it's a mindset. You are not physically a virgin, but you are making a commitment to not having sex of any kind outside of marriage...until you are married.
I agree with all points.Its interesting though...
I get the committment to sex only within a committed relationship. And if that means marriage for some people, I get that too.
I just find the terminology of 'born again virgin' ridiculous and...dare I say...playing into a weird patriarchal concept. Keeping it in your pants, so to speak, does make sense to me personally though. Its a way of shifting focus, I think.
For example, virgins in some cases preserve their virginity via having anal sex. This 'technical' approach loses all context of what the commitment is trying to achieve, imho. Similarly, in a modern context, it loses the benefit of ensuring establishable paternity.
To be clear, this is just general commentary on the concept, not anything specific to posters here.
lol Yes, the key to that statement is 'devoted,' but now that I'm back to Christianity, I'm wondering why so much emphasis on morality for the Abrahamic faiths seem to be surrounding sexuality. As if one's sexual conduct is the litmus test for how moral they are.
I’d never really heard the term and it sounds to me like it could be used to refer to a wide range of different things in different contexts, good, bad or indifferent.
The example you referred to of a couple deciding to stop having sex until their wedding night strikes me as a harmless personal choice. I can see the logic of want to create the special event element of the wedding night that it traditionally (theoretically) had. Really just an extension of the tradition of not seeing each other on the wedding day. I don’t see how it’s any of my business if, when or why they choose to have sex.
Are you not a Muslim?
lol Yes, the key to that statement is 'devoted,' but now that I'm back to Christianity, I'm wondering why so much emphasis on morality for the Abrahamic faiths seem to be surrounding sexuality. As if one's sexual conduct is the litmus test for how moral they are.
Jesus' teachings were not designed to go out of fashion.
He said:
“You heard that it was said: ‘You must not commit adultery.’ 28 But I say to you that everyone who keeps on looking at a woman so as to have a passion for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart. 29 If, now, your right eye is making you stumble, tear it out and throw it away from you. For it is better for you to lose one of your members than for your whole body to be pitched into Ge·henʹna. 30 Also, if your right hand is making you stumble, cut it off and throw it away from you. For it is better for you to lose one of your members than for your whole body to land in Ge·henʹna.
31 “Moreover, it was said: ‘Whoever divorces his wife, let him give her a certificate of divorce.’ 32 However, I say to you that everyone divorcing his wife, except on account of sexual immorality, makes her a subject for adultery, and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery." (Matt 5:27-32)
The word for "sexual immorality" used here is from the Greek por·neiʹa, which is a general term for all unlawful sexual intercourse. It includes adultery, prostitution, sexual relations between unmarried individuals, homosexuality, and bestiality.
So sexual misconduct includes everything of a sexual nature. Those who willfully disobey God's laws in this regard will be liable for punishment.
The fact that even those who call themselves "Christians" flout the teachings of Christ in favor or what is now considered "normal" sexual behavior, says a lot about whether people want to please God or just themselves? SSM is also gaining popularity.....but not with God.
Is it unrealistic to believe that people can still wait for marriage to engage in sexual intimacy? No, I don't believe so, as this is the norm in my brotherhood. We don't ever believe that we are alone, so there is no hiding sexual misconduct from God.
What are the benefits of waiting?
No displeasing God because of a lack of self control. (a fruit of God's spirit)
No guilt or bad conscience to deal with.
Becoming truly "one flesh" with the only person that you have been intimate with.
No unwanted pregnancy. No children born into an uncommitted relationship.
No fear of STI's.
Not counting on sex (just lust) to be your primary attraction to your mate.
Building trust with God and your spouse.
Not feeling like your partner is like "second hand goods"
Virginity was highly valued in Bible times because sexual misconduct was viewed as very serious...adulterers and fornicators could be put to death.
Jesus said at Mark 7:20-23:
“That which comes out of a man is what defiles him. For from inside, out of the heart of men, come injurious reasonings, sexual immorality, thefts, murders, acts of adultery, greed, acts of wickedness, deceit, brazen conduct, an envious eye, blasphemy, haughtiness, and unreasonableness. All these wicked things come from within and defile a man.”
Will God accept us if we become "defiled" in his eyes? Some people obviously think so.