No, because he's a boorish and crass buffoon.
Leave borris johnson out of this.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No, because he's a boorish and crass buffoon.
He learned a new word a few weeks back and wanted to use it in public.Trump: Democrats 'Un-American,' 'Treasonous' During State Of The Union
Yup. This is the guy so many people thought rational enough, and smart enough, to run the country and lead the world.
Comments? Excuses? Allegations about Clinton's emails?
If such tweets didn't contribute to a decay of civil interaction between groups, you'd have a point. Heather Heyer's health, for example, got markedly poorer in a manner that Trump's tweets certainly seem to encourage among some of his followers, whether he's joking or not.Never read in the Constitution how a president should tweet. I'm not in any poorer of health because we have a boorish, crass president.
Implying dissent is a capital offence? So funny! So much for supporting free speech, I guess.
At the presidential level I'm assuming a much higher, and in The Don's case, a more crass, methodology other than a perverse sense of bullying.If such tweets didn't contribute to a decay of civil interaction between groups, you'd have a point. Heather Heyer's health, for example, got markedly poorer in a manner that Trump's tweets certainly seem to encourage among some of his followers, whether he's joking or not.
Ever notice bullies always claim "it was just a joke" when called out? Strangely the people being bullied rarely find it funny, and, even stranger, neither do the bullies when turnabout occurs.
Implying dissent is a capital offence? So funny! So much for supporting free speech, I guess.
I hope he actually tries to have people arrested over it. The resulting mega-embarrassment of a trial would pretty much bump Trump, and possibly even Pence by association.Wow. Trump actually attempts to banalize the very act of calling his opposition treasonous, by leaving us in doubt on whether he means it. The video is very clear on that respect.
I wish I could laugh at that.
Democrats are treasonous for sabotaging Bernie and pushing Hillary and treasonous for the upheaval they are giving Trump and allowing a bunch of illegals in the US. They are literally filth, end of story.
If you can think of a better word, I'm all ears.At the presidential level I'm assuming a much higher, and in The Don's case, a more crass, methodology other than a perverse sense of bullying.
Democrats are treasonous for sabotaging Bernie and pushing Hillary and treasonous for the upheaval they are giving Trump and allowing a bunch of illegals in the US. They are literally filth, end of story.
Any surprise?So much for showing respect.
Political intrigue. It sounds so much nicer I think.If you can think of a better word, I'm all ears.
I don't see that as apt. Sorry.Political intrigue. It sounds so much nicer I think.
Comments?
Trump's not a bozo.
You mean the hair?Come on. Is it really that hard to look at his face and tell there's something not right upstairs?
You mean the hair?
Rose tints my world.I don't see that as apt. Sorry.
That should clear that up.I told one of them on Facebook today that it's ridiculous.
How did it go from "not supporting free speech," to, "quashing free speech?"Who's free speech was quashed?