British Values

[The Emperor of Mankind]

Tommy has shown that he has tremendous mental strength to be able to survive all that has been thrown at him.

But not the mental strength to help him understand the law of the country he claims to love so much, nor how to obey it.

 

[Notanumber]

But not the mental strength to help him understand the law of the country he claims to love so much, nor how to obey it.

Which law would that be?

Our dualistic legal system differs according to whom it is being applied.

 

[Altfish]

Which law would that be?

Our dualistic legal system differs according to whom it is being applied.

Aren't Sovereignty and British Values a nuisance.
What we need is a European Court that you can appeal it to.

 

[Notanumber]

Aren't Sovereignty and British Values a nuisance.
What we need is a European Court that you can appeal it to.

If things do not improve once we are out, we will know whom to blame.

 

[Altfish]

If things do not improve once we are out, we will know whom to blame.

Yes, the 52% who voted for unicorns

 

[The Emperor of Mankind]

If things do not improve once we are out, we will know whom to blame.

1. The rich who conned people into voting Leave for their benefit;
2. The rich who will lobby government to strip away our rights post-Brexit;
3. The rich who will continue to avoid and evade tax in the UK;
4. Those who voted Leave in the first place;
5. Those who voted Leave and would rather double down on their stupidity than admit they might have been wrong;
6. The Tories for forcing this unnecessary referendum on the UK in the first place;
7. The Remain campaign for being too complacent and not challenging Brexiter bull**** enough;
8. Those people who stupidly insist that the referendum result should stand despite the fact it was won illegally & deceitfully which is a slap in the face to democracy

 

[Notanumber]

1. The rich who conned people into voting Leave for their benefit;
2. The rich who will lobby government to strip away our rights post-Brexit;
3. The rich who will continue to avoid and evade tax in the UK;
4. Those who voted Leave in the first place;
5. Those who voted Leave and would rather double down on their stupidity than admit they might have been wrong;
6. The Tories for forcing this unnecessary referendum on the UK in the first place;
7. The Remain campaign for being too complacent and not challenging Brexiter bull**** enough;
8. Those people who stupidly insist that the referendum result should stand despite the fact it was won illegally & deceitfully which is a slap in the face to democracy

We will need to keep a wary eye on the sore losers.

 

[Altfish]

We will need to keep a wary eye on the sore losers.

It is the winners who are doing the bleating, "Don't blame us, it is not the brexit we voted for; May's a Remoaner; but whatever you do DON'T BLAME US"

 

[The Emperor of Mankind]

Which law would that be?

Our dualistic legal system differs according to whom it is being applied.

English Common Law and neither you nor your cult hero Stephen can plead ignorance as a viable reason for him to not be subjected to it like anyone else.

 

[Notanumber]

English Common Law and neither you nor your cult hero Stephen can plead ignorance as a viable reason for him to not be subjected to it like anyone else.

I am sure that Tommy Robinson would be the first to applaud if we had one law for all in the UK.

 

[The Emperor of Mankind]

I am sure that Tommy Robinson would be the first to applaud if we had one law for all in the UK.

I'm sure he would but Scotland has its own distinct legal system guaranteed by the Treaty of Union 1707. Notions of 'one law for all' in this case do not line up with the legal reality of the UK.

I would feel more assured about this if Stephen were to obey the laws we have in place now but sadly he cannot.

 

[Notanumber]

I'm sure he would but Scotland has its own distinct legal system guaranteed by the Treaty of Union 1707. Notions of 'one law for all' in this case do not line up with the legal reality of the UK.

I would feel more assured about this if Stephen were to obey the laws we have in place now but sadly he cannot.

Will anyone be imprisoned for invading the privacy of this innocent couple?

Couple released without charge over Gatwick drone 'could win substantial payout'

 

[Altfish]

Will anyone be imprisoned for invading the privacy of this innocent couple?

Couple released without charge over Gatwick drone 'could win substantial payout'

Hopefully the editor of The Mail on Sunday and other publications that ignored the "Innocent until proven guilty" element that is the backbone of English Law.

 

[Notanumber]

If we are going to run the risk of being prosecuted for a Hate Crime, surely we should be informed as to what constitutes said crime –

 

[The Emperor of Mankind]

If we are going to run the risk of being prosecuted for a Hate Crime, surely we should be informed as to what constitutes said crime –

Hows about you get informed as to what Contempt Of Court is and why Stephen Lennon was imprisoned for it?

 

[Notanumber]

Hows about you get informed as to what Contempt Of Court is and why Stephen Lennon was imprisoned for it?

Tommy has received his punishment very swiftly whether or not he deserved it.

I have heard of no cases where Tommy has named and shamed anyone that has not even been charged with a crime unlike those reporters in the Gatwick Drone case. The people that Tommy was sent to prison over had been charged and found guilty. They were attending court to be sentenced and Tommy was providing a public service to ensure that justice was seen to be done.

I am concerned about innocent people having the sword of Damocles dangled above their heads for something that they might do or say that could be construed as ‘Hate’.

 

[The Emperor of Mankind]

Tommy has received his punishment very swiftly whether or not he deserved it.

Probably because he pleaded guilty which sped the process up somewhat. Even Stephen admits what he did was a breach of the law.

I have heard of no cases where Tommy has named and shamed anyone that has not even been charged with a crime unlike those reporters in the Gatwick Drone case. The people that Tommy was sent to prison over had been charged and found guilty.

There was a court order in place for that specific trial which was why there was restrictions on reporting on it. He was imprisoned partly for breaching that but also for breaching the terms of his suspended sentence. For a time there was also a restriction on reporting the fact that Stephen Yaxley-Lennon had been imprisoned for the breach of the reporting restriction. It's not the wider press' fault if Stephen doesn't a) know what those restrictions are or how they work or; b) is unable to grasp what a 'suspended sentence' entails.

They were attending court to be sentenced and Tommy was providing a public service to ensure that justice was seen to be done.

Can you explain how his reactionary bollocks was a public service in light of the fact a) he violated a court order to do it and b) he risked derailing a trial which would have cost the taxpayer thousands and thousands of £s to rerun?

I thought you were against the taxpayer having to foot the bill for pointless expenses?

 

[Altfish]

Well since you praise Mussolini and guess what he was...?

 

[Notanumber]

Probably because he pleaded guilty which sped the process up somewhat. Even Stephen admits what he did was a breach of the law.

There was a court order in place for that specific trial which was why there was restrictions on reporting on it. He was imprisoned partly for breaching that but also for breaching the terms of his suspended sentence. For a time there was also a restriction on reporting the fact that Stephen Yaxley-Lennon had been imprisoned for the breach of the reporting restriction. It's not the wider press' fault if Stephen doesn't a) know what those restrictions are or how they work or; b) is unable to grasp what a 'suspended sentence' entails.

Can you explain how his reactionary bollocks was a public service in light of the fact a) he violated a court order to do it and b) he risked derailing a trial which would have cost the taxpayer thousands and thousands of £s to rerun?

I thought you were against the taxpayer having to foot the bill for pointless expenses?

I have to be careful about what I say, but if you want the truth, you should listen to this interview.

Tommy has many Muslim friends and does not condemn Muslims per say but he has great concerns about the ideology of Islam and how political correctness is defending it.

What has Tommy said in the above interview that is blatantly untrue?

 

[ChristineM]

If we are going to run the risk of being prosecuted for a Hate Crime, surely we should be informed as to what constitutes said crime –

Contempt of court is a british value?

Seems that is is not one you would admit to