• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Burden of Proof is on Atheists

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
NO. I know better my God than any disbeliever on Earth. Look, who knows better of driving: driver, or non-driver?
Better of fighting: fighter, or non-fighter? Believer knows more of belief, than non-believer.
That claim is refuted by your inability to support your claims. Unless you want to claim that your God is a made up being that only exists in your head. Then your claim would be indisputable. But if you are talking about a real God that doe snot appear to be the case.
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
No machine no theories for machines either is earths status.

Hence no satellites. No haarp. No comment computers. No TVs. No phones. No radios. No power plants no converting dusts.

No science says a lying theist. A human.

O earth a planet is one. Sealed mass owning all gods in one state.

O gods heavens planet owned. The gas the state the conditions with his life lived living is owned nowhere else. Three words life it lives is living.

Life lived past living present. Holy three by thinking man he him his sick mind possessed.

As one man.

If that one man continues to lie about earth we will all die. Sacrificed.

As his old new theme is that life began in water as microbes locked sealed inside a shut fused stone earth mass.

His thesis.

If you don't listen to father's advice every human will learn that Jesus was a lie. Life is not meant to be biologically destroyed.

It is a theism written as human evidence against human Satanists.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
I could be published there even if it is in arXiv now. The fact, that arXiv accepted it by moderation, tells journals, that the paper is good.
No. It does not.

Although arXiv is not peer reviewed, a collection of moderators for each area review the submissions; they may recategorize any that are deemed off-topic,[23] or reject submissions that are not scientific papers, or sometimes for undisclosed reasons.[24] The lists of moderators for many sections of arXiv are publicly available,[25] but moderators for most of the physics sections remain unlisted.

Additionally, an "endorsement" system was introduced in 2004 as part of an effort to ensure content is relevant and of interest to current research in the specified disciplines.[26] Under the system, for categories that use it, an author must be endorsed by an established arXiv author before being allowed to submit papers to those categories. Endorsers are not asked to review the paper for errors, but to check whether the paper is appropriate for the intended subject area.[23] New authors from recognized academic institutions generally receive automatic endorsement, which in practice means that they do not need to deal with the endorsement system at all. However, the endorsement system has attracted criticism for allegedly restricting scientific inquiry.[27][28]

A majority of the e-prints are also submitted to journals for publication, but some work, including some very influential papers, remain purely as e-prints and are never published in a peer-reviewed journal. A well-known example of the latter is an outline of a proof of Thurston's geometrization conjecture, including the Poincaré conjecture as a particular case, uploaded by Grigori Perelman in November 2002.[29] Perelman appears content to forgo the traditional peer-reviewed journal process, stating: "If anybody is interested in my way of solving the problem, it's all there [on the arXiv] – let them go and read about it".[30] Despite this non-traditional method of publication, other mathematicians recognized this work by offering the Fields Medal and Clay Mathematics Millennium Prizes to Perelman, both of which he refused.[31]

While arXiv does contain some dubious e-prints, such as those claiming to refute famous theorems or proving famous conjectures such as Fermat's Last Theorem using only high-school mathematics, a 2002 article which appeared in Notices of the American Mathematical Society described those as "surprisingly rare".[32] arXiv generally re-classifies these works, e.g. in "General mathematics", rather than deleting them;[33] however, some authors have voiced concern over the lack of transparency in the arXiv screening process.[24]
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
LOL! An m word is a word that begins with m. By context the two were "miracle" and "magic" and yes, They are synonymous. Now I would suggest that you edit your post. Calling someone else a liar is a big no no.
M is a letter that doesn't own a word.

Only a word is a word as a word using the term letters.

You want me to explain why a man gave a letter a number.

Is why a man said let me think how I can break open earths sealed atom by star.

His answer remove water as it formed in space pressure where the atom formed.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
M is a letter that doesn't own a word.

Only a word is a word as a word using the term letters.

You want me to explain why a man gave a letter a number.

Is why a man said let me think how I can break open earths sealed atom by star.

His answer remove water as it formed in space pressure where the atom formed.
Nope.
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
That has nothing to do with the discussion. Besides being just a story from a holy book.
A man who says he's holy wrote the book.

Your claim as a man on earth only one self is that you could think because of how my god giving you mind support of a holy mind. Was termed by its spirit cloud forming movement cooling gases to remain blue. Allowed me to own speak words.

Taught only because he lost natural spoken word use as language by sacrificed brain mind.

As you don't teach natural.

As coat of many colours scientific theist liar satanist. Said the father baby man as we've all been babies since invented satanisms. Owned used a thesis cost of many colours.

So he damned DNA natural history. Life he said will be lived cursed forever.

By star gas burning attack on how a lying mind. Theist. Was introduced.

The father owning thesis as a scientific father was the reason coat of burning gas inherited by baby man that sacrificed baby man's life.

As first natural father had not invented science. Baby father did. Our father as babies.

As gods earth saviour baby stable life stable brain was by saviour reborn ice.

As iced water and ice kept by two the heavens gases cooled. Water becomes hot with hot gas. Ice cooled both.

Our saviour gods ice only. Is ice exact gods earth.

One womb saviour O God asteroid o moon.

O a God only.

Stars not any God O was a teaching.

Science begins thesis in cosmos not a God.

Said M for middle 13 was a burning gas in a womb voiding vacuum. Above our heads. Not in 12 natural light.

I will think. I will impose. I will value. I will copy and change the one fused God to equal M.

So science changed holy earth MA S S that travelled as stone ark in mother womb via space conditions. Holy mother earth story owning holy earth nature.

That owned blue light veil.

He changed it.

Mother earth was stone zero rock space holy with its holy one veil blue that we lived with. Travelling on its holy earth journey.

Men of science said I made the veil evil direct worded used statement.
Veil eVil.

So no scientist could argue they caused gas burning heavenly fallout themselves. LiFe sacrificed by baby man human father science theist.

Holy star one God o moon only. Why mother terms were stated O earth rock space womb held. Earths o.moon space womb held. Earths blue veil space womb held.

As scientists are all humans first. The light does not shift from earths heavens above. Scientists are self possessed inventor human egotists who lie. We taught as humans scientists are life's destroyer.

Natural humans never lied the theist did.

Coat of many colours owned sacrificed man adult father's life.

Baby was born as gods stable kept blue light mother sky veil. Cooling spirit angels of God clouds cooling returned blue light holy veil.

Stable life only. Taught exact.

It was why they stated Joseph ..sephiroth was not Jesus Baby father holy baby.

It was a directly taught directly stated holy heavens reasoned for human baby life reborn healthy.

Life was not meant to be sacrificed.

No man is God is the third position first correct status. That told why no man is God.

Once again. The satanic book was shut as a legal condition for new human laws.
.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
A man who says he's holy wrote the book.

Your claim as a man on earth only one self is that you could think because of how my god giving you mind support of a holy mind. Was termed by its spirit cloud forming movement cooling gases to remain blue. Allowed me to own speak words.

Taught only because he lost natural spoken word use as language by sacrificed brain mind.

As you don't teach natural.

As coat of many colours scientific theist liar satanist. Said the father baby man as we've all been babies since invented satanisms. Owned used a thesis cost of many colours.

So he damned DNA natural history. Life he said will be lived cursed forever.

By star gas burning attack on how a lying mind. Theist. Was introduced.

The father owning thesis as a scientific father was the reason coat of burning gas inherited by baby man hat sacrificed baby man's life.

As first natural father had not invented science. Baby father did. Our father as babies.

As gods earth saviour baby stable life stable brain was by saviour reborn ice.

As iced water and ice kept by two the heavens gases cooled. Water becomes hot with hot gas. Ice cooled both.

Our saviour gods ice only. Is ice exact gods earth.

One womb saviour O God asteroid o moon.

O a God only.

Stars not any God O was a teaching.

Science begins thesis in cosmos not a God.

Said M for middle 13 was a burning gas in a womb voiding vacuum. Above our heads. Not in 12 natural light.

I will think. I will impose. I will value. I will copy and change the one fused God to equal M.

So science changed holy earth MA S S that travelled as stone ark in mother womb via space conditions. Holy mother earth story owning holy earth nature.

That owned blue light veil.

He changed it.

Mother earth was stone zero rock space holy with its holy one veil blue that we lived with. Travelling on its holy earth journey.

Men of science said I made the veil evil direct worded used statement.
Veil eVil.

So no scientist could argue they caused gas burning heavenly fallout themselves. LiFe sacrificed by baby man human father science theist.

Holy star one God o moon only. Why mother terms were stated O earth rock space womb held. Earths o.moon space womb held. Earths blue veil space womb held.

As scientists are all humans first. The light does not shift from earths heavens above. Scientists are self possessed inventor human egotists who lie. We taught as humans scientists are life's destroyer.

Natural humans never lied the theist did.

Coat of many colours owned sacrificed man adult father's life.

Baby was born as gods stable kept blue light mother sky veil. Cooling spirit angels of God clouds cooling returned blue light holy veil.

Stable life only.

It was why they stated Joseph ..sephiroth was not Jesus Baby father holy baby.

It was a directly taught directly stated holy heavens reasoned for human baby life reborn healthy.

Life was not meant to be sacrificed.

No man is God is the third position first correct status. That told why no man is God.

Once again. The satanic book was shut as a legal condition for new human laws.
.
TLDR
 
Top