Calming a tense nation

[Kenny]

She turned over all official e-mails.

How do you know?

OOPS! We found more!

Lost emails from Clinton server discovered

 

[Valjean]

How do you know?

OOPS! We found more!

Lost emails from Clinton server discovered

You assume she's guilty of something nefarious with no evidence. Wedding plans, Yoga routines and advice on a secure Blackberry? Yeah, that sounds suspicious....
Hardly "official e-mails."

The linked article contains no evidence of wrongdoing. It predicts the missing e-mails will eventually be recovered. Why don't we wait till then before we charge her with high treason?

Again, why do you think Hillary's anything but a loyal, patriotic American?

 

[Kenny]

You assume she's guilty of something nefarious with no evidence. Wedding plans, Yoga routines and advice on a secure Blackberry? Yeah, that sounds suspicious....
Hardly "official e-mails."

The linked article contains no evidence of wrongdoing. It predicts the missing e-mails will eventually be recovered. Why don't we wait till then before we charge her with high treason?

Again, why do you think Hillary's anything but a loyal, patriotic American?

Apparently you haven't been up on it and certainly don't seem to want to investigate. We will have to agree to disagree.

 

[Lyndon]

In total, more than 30,000 emails were deleted "because they were personal and private about matters that I believed were within the scope of my personal privacy," Clinton told reporters in March of 2015, as the controversy around her private emails was growing.

Why Hillary Clinton Deleted 33,000 Emails on Her Private Email Server

You can't change history - it's called tampering with the evidence.

I'm sure if they were going to release your emails, you'd have quite a few you considered personal and private!!

 

[Lyndon]

You want to really find dirt, look at President Trump's emails!

 

[Kenny]

I'm sure if they were going to release your emails, you'd have quite a few you considered personal and private!!

And if you touched them your would be charged with "tampering with evidence"... common man!

 

[tytlyf]

How do you know?

OOPS! We found more!

Lost emails from Clinton server discovered

That's 4 years old. There was nothing illegal about deleting emails. If it was wrong, investigations would have come to that conclusion. It's a nothingberder again...
Don't you check the dates of your information sources?

 

[suncowiam]

In My Opinion, if the election was stolen, such theft should be exposed so it can never happen again. In My Opinion, the Democrats and Media have done everything they can to divide the Nation these past four years. I don't trust the Democrat Party, having been a member all my life until recently. I don't trust the Media, seeing that it is all politicized. I am hoping it doesn't go up in flames, but if that is required to realign the system back into balance, it might be necessary. Let us hope for the best.

View attachment 44830

The problem with this statement is that it is a mirror of the opinions of the left reflecting on the right...

So... If you don't trust the media, which is a fair comment, how are you getting your news? I have to assume you are getting your news still from the media.

You could possibly be right but if your news is wrong then you are basically at fault for the same criticism.

 

[Shadow Wolf]

In total, more than 30,000 emails were deleted "because they were personal and private about matters that I believed were within the scope of my personal privacy," Clinton told reporters in March of 2015, as the controversy around her private emails was growing.

Why Hillary Clinton Deleted 33,000 Emails on Her Private Email Server

You can't change history - it's called tampering with the evidence.

According to you, not the law. You are making assunptions where you have no evidence.

 

[Valjean]

The problem with this statement is that it is a mirror of the opinions of the left reflecting on the right...

So... If you don't trust the media, which is a fair comment, how are you getting your news? I have to assume you are getting your news still from the media.

You could possibly be right but if your news is wrong then you are basically at fault for the same criticism.

Opinions are fine for personal use, but in a serious discussion or on a talk board I'd stick to facts as much as possible.

 

[Valjean]

That's 4 years old. There was nothing illegal about deleting emails. If it was wrong, investigations would have come to that conclusion. It's a nothingberder again...
Don't you check the dates of your information sources?

The article says: "Tom Fitton, the head of Judicial Watch, has said that he expects all of the emails to eventually come to light."
The link says:
"All of the roughly 30,000 personal emails Hillary Clinton claimed to have deleted from her private email server will eventually be reviewed by the government — and many will be made public, according to a top legal adversary of Clinton.

“They’re all going to get reviewed eventually, despite Mrs. Clinton’s resistance,” Tom Fitton, the head of the conservative legal watchdog organization Judicial Watch, said in an interview with The Hill."

OK, they've had four years to dig up the dirt on Clinton. Had they found any, they would have shouted it from the rooftops.

 

[tytlyf]

The article says: "Tom Fitton, the head of Judicial Watch, has said that he expects all of the emails to eventually come to light."
The link says:
"All of the roughly 30,000 personal emails Hillary Clinton claimed to have deleted from her private email server will eventually be reviewed by the government — and many will be made public, according to a top legal adversary of Clinton.

“They’re all going to get reviewed eventually, despite Mrs. Clinton’s resistance,” Tom Fitton, the head of the conservative legal watchdog organization Judicial Watch, said in an interview with The Hill."

OK, they've had four years to dig up the dirt on Clinton. Had they found any, they would have shouted it from the rooftops.

These corrupt RW "organizations" are all the same. Corporate agenda.
Tom is always on Fox, he even looks suspect.

 

[suncowiam]

Opinions are fine for personal use, but in a serious discussion or on a talk board I'd stick to facts as much as possible.

I don't know what you are asserting and why it relates to my comment.

Serious discussions can be a mix of opinions and facts. Talking boards can be a mix of opinions and facts. Opinions and facts don't necessarily conflict or overlap with each other. It will depend on the conversation.

So again, what is your point?

 

[Valjean]

I don't know what you are asserting and why it relates to my comment.

Serious discussions can be a mix of opinions and facts. Talking boards can be a mix of opinions and facts. Opinions and facts don't necessarily conflict or overlap with each other. It will depend on the conversation.

So again, what is your point?

Sorry, it was just a general reflection on some of the fallacious and unsupported propaganda being promoted as fact.

 

[suncowiam]

Sorry, it was just a general reflection on some of the fallacious and unsupported propaganda being promoted as fact.

Got it.