First, thank you for a real answer rather than just offering a short talking point.Here's my source. God doesn't want everyone to be saved, otherwise He would offer "special pardons", as you put it, to ALL, not just "some". The Calvinist view of a Limited Atonement is in no way Scriptural, and very sad to think about. John Calvin was a lawyer, not a theologian, and his cold legalism spills all over into his view of a careless, aloof God.
(Re: 'arbitrarily')And God only chooses to save some, arbitrarily, without care for anyone else.
I actually have no idea.
I honestly do not know what criteria God uses to choose one and not another.
The only thing that I can offer is strictly from MY personal experience ... it does not seem to be based on any innate merit to be found in ME.
I would not have chosen me as one worthy to be saved, there were so many who needed far less 'cleaning up' than I did.
Thus I am left with the curious and not particularly intellectually satisfying answer of 'for reasons known only to God.'
I guess saving me somehow makes sense to God.
[To which I can only respond with deep gratitude.]
If you would indulge me with a follow on question just for clarification:From Chapter 21, Book III of John Calvin's Institutes of Christian Religion:
But if it is plainly owing to the mere pleasure of God that salvation is spontaneously offered to some, while others have no access to it, great and difficult questions immediately arise, questions which are inexplicable, when just views are not entertained concerning election and predestination. To many this seems a perplexing subject, because they deem it most incongruous that of the great body of mankind some should be predestinated to salvation, and others to destruction. How ceaselessly they entangle themselves will appear as we proceed. We may add, that in the very obscurity which deters them, we may see not only the utility of this doctrine, but also its most pleasant fruits. We shall never feel persuaded as we ought that our salvation flows from the free mercy of God as its fountain, until we are made acquainted with his eternal election, the grace of God being illustrated by the contrast--viz. that he does not adopt all promiscuously to the hope of salvation, but gives to some what he denies to others.
...
5. The predestination by which God adopts some to the hope of life, and adjudges others to eternal death, no man who would be thought pious ventures simply to deny; but it is greatly caviled at, especially by those who make prescience its cause. . . . By predestination we mean the eternal decree of God, by which he determined with himself whatever he wished to happen with regard to every man. All are not created on equal terms, but some are preordained to eternal life, others to eternal damnation; and, accordingly, as each has been created for one or other of these ends, we say that he has been predestinated to life or to death.
Straight from the horse's mouth. This is not a God that so loved the world. This is not a God that is Love. This is not a God Who desires that all be saved and come to the knowledge of the truth. No, this is a God that plays a cosmic lottery with our souls without care for us. John Calvin speaks of God's grace, but there is no grace in this teaching, only capriciousness.
Do you believe that any soul that God created will be lost (damned)?
I am just trying to understand if it is damnation that you find lacking in love or God's selection method (as described by Calvin), so I know how to respond (If I have a response).