Guy Threepwood
Mighty Pirate
Big Bang Theory is just a wild guess at best. It is one of the wildest pieces of speculation out there that atheists choose to accept as fact.
Lemaitre was a priest..
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Big Bang Theory is just a wild guess at best. It is one of the wildest pieces of speculation out there that atheists choose to accept as fact.
Source please
Thank you"In particle physics, the electroweak interaction is the unified description of two of the four known fundamental interactions of nature: electromagnetism and the weak interaction. Although these two forces appear very different at everyday low energies, the theory models them as two different aspects of the same force. Above the unification energy, on the order of 100 GeV, they would merge into a single electroweak force. Thus, if the universe is hot enough (approximately 1015K, a temperature exceeded until shortly after the Big Bang), "
The current forces of the universe did not exist when the temperature of the universe was significantly higher. The current, best theory is that forces combined, like how electro magnetism and the weak force combine at higher temperature.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electroweak_interaction
You're interested in how I form my beliefs about the nature of grammar, translation, and language? Because I'm not a believer (I'm agnostic). To me the issue of the Hebrew here is purely matter of grammar and the issue of translation is exactly that: one of translation no different than if the text in question were Euripides' Medea or Frege's Begriffsschrift und andere Aufsätze.Because I am way more interested in HOW people form their beliefs
Again the issue is their conclusion was based on a number of fallacious ideas.
Which is followed up by the fact that I point out that they are human; the point of the post had nothing to really do with their accuracy but just the fact that they are human and thus prone to error
Big Bang Theory is just a wild guess at best. It is one of the wildest pieces of speculation out there that atheists choose to accept as fact.
Big Bang Theory is just a wild guess at best. It is one of the wildest pieces of speculation out there that atheists choose to accept as fact.
Where do you find references to "the earth becoming waste and ruin/formless and void"?The one issue I do see with what is actually written in the bible is the exact time and nature of the earth becoming waste and ruin/formless and void.
I've found the commentaries by Sarna and Plaut useful in this regard.It is most likely that we took the earlier written Babylonian creation narrative and reworked it to fill in our own morals and values, thus it's really best, imo, to take this and some other narratives as being largely allegory.
so you don't really understand?.....and yet you carry on as if you do....We don't know if there were or weren't outside forces involved in the BB because we simply do not know what caused it, if anything caused it at all. The laws of physics at that point was so different than we regularly experience, and getting to understand them is so terribly difficult.
Are you sure that you're not projecting?so you don't really understand?.....and yet you carry on as if you do....
Thanks for the heads-up on that.I've found the commentaries by Sarna and Plaut useful in this regard.
I don't know how you got that out of what I actually wrote, but I guess go with whatever floats your little boat.so you don't really understand?.....and yet you carry on as if you do....
I was just reading about the Hypsithermal Interval -during which the Earth was warmer than it has been since.It is most likely that we took the earlier written Babylonian creation narrative and reworked it to fill in our own morals and values, thus it's really best, imo, to take this and some other narratives as being largely allegory.
We don't know if there were or weren't outside forces involved in the BB because we simply do not know what caused it, if anything caused it at all. The laws of physics at that point was so different than we regularly experience, and getting to understand them is so terribly difficult.
I don't know how you got that out of what I actually wrote, but I guess go with whatever floats your little boat.
You have misrepresented my motive and my position, so either you have a reading problem, a logic problem, a truth problem, or some combination of these.you have been posting all through this thread as if you have an understanding .....
then you post ....getting to understand them (the laws of physics).....is so terribly difficult.
and there seems a denial you have not put forward.....
substance cannot move without something (Someone) to move it
science would insist on a motivation
that motivation will not be substance moving itself.......
Spirit first
or do you prefer your denial?.....because the understanding is so terribly difficult
cause and effect ARE a necessity.You have misrepresented my motive and my position, so either you have a reading problem, a logic problem, a truth problem, or some combination of these.
It is just "amazing" that you deem cause and effect as a necessity, which I have agreed with in general, and yet you do not apply that same necessity to your belief about God. One of those at least has to go back into infinity, and we do know about cause-and-effect but we don't know with any certainty whatsoever if there is a deity or deities or none of the above, so your "logic" is totally 100% flawed.
Maybe if you start doing some studying on the subject instead of just spouting that which you clearly do not understand, so here's where you can start: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang
Until you can put forth some sort of logical, coherent position with evidence to support it, then I'm not going to wasting my time.