allfoak
Alchemist
No it would not.
I have not called you anything
I didn't say you called me anything.
Okay , again i am sorry.
If you want i will try again.
i get so frustrated trying to explain myself.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No it would not.
I have not called you anything
If you want i will try again.
.
The scriptures were written in the language of the soul.
Yeah, it kind of is. Each verse is set within a relevant context that needs to be taken under consideration. It's a vital part of the exegetical process that allows us to read out of the texts what's there.First of all i don't have time to read all of your posts.
Second i don't need to memorize the book to understand one verse.
It is not written that way.
That "someone" is the collective body of scholars, working collaboratively. That method has emerged, because it yields the most honest results. What you're saying here amounts to you being the "people [who] are just making things up and calling it truth." Peer-review is needed to corroborate results. IOW, it's a communal effort.i have already answered your questions.
To tell someone what the Bible is supposed to mean to them is heresy.
Paul said it himself.
People are just making things up and calling it truth.
Someone even made up the method in which i am supposed to study the book.
let's just leave it at that.
I have no way of explaining to you on this forum that Christians are being led astray.
That "someone" is the collective body of scholars, working collaboratively. That method has emerged, because it yields the most honest results. What you're saying here amounts to you being the "people [who] are just making things up and calling it truth." Peer-review is needed to corroborate results. IOW, it's a communal effort.
How is it that you know that you know what you think you know?
Because I collaborated with a lot of people -- knowledgeable and simple -- scholars and non-scholars -- in studying the texts, usually through the specified exegetical process. Through that process, I developed a unique take on the texts that is uniquely mine, but that I share with the unique takes of others in order to create a broader context for understanding.nevermind
Just answer this:
How is it that you know that you know what you think you know?
Because I collaborated with a lot of people -- knowledgeable and simple -- scholars and non-scholars -- in studying the texts, usually through the specified exegetical process. Through that process, I developed a unique take on the texts that is uniquely mine, but that I share with the unique takes of others in order to create a broader context for understanding.
Have you had years of college on this very topic?
Well, yeah, that's kind of how learning works. Even you -- someone who has no college education, let alone a graduate education -- you are only able to read the bible because someone else taught you to read. You can only read the bible because someone else translated the Hebrew and Greek texts into English, and because someone else wrote it, and because someone else printed it, and because someone else distributed it and sold it.You don't understand what i am asking.
The only thing you know is what someone else told you.
And they only know what someone else told them.
and they only know what someone else told them.
and on and on ....
Well, yeah, that's kind of how learning works. Even you -- someone who has no college education, let alone a graduate education -- you are only able to read the bible because someone else taught you to read. You can only read the bible because someone else translated the Hebrew and Greek texts into English, and because someone else wrote it, and because someone else printed it, and because someone else distributed it and sold it.
There is no "me alone."
You do if you want to come to informed conclusions about Genesis. Otherwise, you're only getting second hand information.Don't need the Bible to learn the truth.
don't even need to know how to read.
i tried college.
It wasn't for me.
I am better at learning things on my own.
That's how I was when I was young.
Went back later in life for these topics. It makes all the difference.
All the things you think you know, will probably change with education and knowledge. There is so much to learn here that deals with life in general.
These skills go a long way past the knowledge you think you will get.
and could go a long way past this life!
oh!....that's right.....you want to be dust.
Wants don't matter to truth.
So what are you saying? Knowledge is useless? I suppose that's why God gave us cognitive ability -- so we could remain ignorant, because knowledge doesn't matter.and could go a long way past this life!
oh!....that's right.....you want to be dust.
So what are you saying? Knowledge is useless? I suppose that's why God gave us cognitive ability -- so we could remain ignorant, because knowledge doesn't matter.
allfoak said:i have already answered your questions.
To tell someone what the Bible is supposed to mean to them is heresy.
Paul said it himself.
People are just making things up and calling it truth.
Someone even made up the method in which i am supposed to study the book.
let's just leave it at that.
I have no way of explaining to you on this forum that Christians are being led astray.
this is neither evidence nor an argument.and if the your truth leads you to your box and eternal darkness.....
good luck with that!