• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Can religion reject this science ?

Subduction Zone

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
james blunt said:
So what ?

I have no credentials and I am treated like an idiot , so you should treat him like an idiot !
Click to expand...
there is a very good reason that you are treated that way. You cannot even do simple addition and get you think you know more than real scientists. Bill Nye does not have that sort of arrogance at all.
 
J

james blunt

Well-Known Member
In a re-run of the first measure , the experimenters decide to swap the clocks around

..........1.s

.....0.5s


First experiment

t (A ) = 0.5s

t (B) = 1.s


Second experiment


t (A) = 0.5s

t (B) = 1.s


t (A) total = 1.5s

t (B) total = 1.5s


ok so far , do you agree with the maths ?
 
ratiocinator

ratiocinator

Lightly seared on the reality grill.
james blunt said:
You'll never learn , I know what Wiki says !
Click to expand...

The first link was to a real experimental test of time dilation. The second explained how the GPS system needs to take account of time dilation in order to work properly.

It is you who are steadfastly refusing to learn anything. Wittering on about clocks on a forum can't compete with real experiments and real technology.

You have neither shown an inconsistency in the theories, nor have you got any actual experiments that contradict them, nor have you got any explanation for the experiments that confirm them - and you can't do maths.

You have exactly nothing.
 
J

james blunt

Well-Known Member
Subduction Zone said:
No, I did not lie. I tried to go over the concept using the number line. You could not keep up.
Click to expand...
What you're really doing is spamming the thread in gibberish to hide my important posts, knowing people will not read all the pages and often will only read the latest posts .
 
J

james blunt

Well-Known Member
ratiocinator said:
The first link was to a real experimental test of time dilation. The second explained how the GPS system needs to take account of time dilation in order to work properly.

It is you who are steadfastly refusing to learn anything. Wittering on about clocks on a forum can't compete with real experiments and real technology.

You have neither shown an inconsistency in the theories, nor have you got any actual experiments that contradict them, nor have you got any explanation for the experiments that confirm them - and you can't do maths.

You have exactly nothing.
Click to expand...
You are burying the diagram and ignoring the questions I ask you . Replying with Dogma ...
 
J

james blunt

Well-Known Member
ratiocinator said:
Real experiments and real technology aren't dogma - they are what is called "evidence".
Click to expand...
You're not even willing to hear the error and understand the correct semantics !


Let me give you something to ponder over if you can think, both clocks exist simultaneously always . Both clocks always experience the longer time line . The shorter miss-timing measurement is not relevant in regards to time .

A timing offset is not a change of time !
 
Subduction Zone

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
james blunt said:
I can do maths , I can learn maths , I don't need to learn maths as I have no use for it , I need my own maths for my own theories .
Click to expand...
Your math appears to be of no use. You have a very low understanding of math. To do work in the sciences you need quite a bit of math.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top