Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Nothing sexier than an intelligent woman.....you go girl!WLC is correct. Science as a methodology rests on certain ontological and epistemic foundations; the efficacy of mathematics to describe the universe being one of those.
Mathematical truths prove themselves just fine without science anyway as most of them are incorrigible.
To each his own.Nothing sexier than an intelligent woman.....you go girl!
To each his own.
The negation of "Smart women" is not "dumb women". Silly girl...You prefer dumb women?
The negation of "Smart women" is not "dumb women". Silly girl...
No... what about men? (I'm not gay... but... it could be that what is preferred is dumb men)Ok wise guy.
"You prefer dumb or average women?"
Better?
No... what about men? (I'm not gay... but... it could be that what is preferred is dumb men)
No, but intelligent women aren't at the top of my sexiest list. That would go to smart and fetching.You prefer dumb women?
No, but intelligent women aren't at the top of my sexiest list. That would go to smart and fetching.
Awww, did the mean man hurt your feelings?Since someone was referring to me and you said "to each his own" the implication is that you don't think I'm fetching.
I'm hurt.
My remark wasn't in reference to you, but to ninerbuff's qualification for being sexy: an "intelligent woman," and that's it; so "to each his own." But I do find you fetching . . . wanna see my apartment ?Since someone was referring to me and you said "to each his own" the implication is that you don't think I'm fetching.
I'm hurt.
lol jk
Since someone was referring to me and you said "to each his own" the implication is that you don't think I'm fetching.
I'm hurt.
lol jk
You're fetching, bedazzeling, spectacular, stupendeous, amazing, beguiling, astounding, flabberghasting, overwhelming, magnificent, charming, bewitching,...*gasp*...breathtaking, and just plain cute.
Awww, did the mean man hurt your feelings?
But seriously, out of curiosity, how do you react if/when guys hit on you and conversely how do you react if a guy doesn't find you attractive?
Note: I'm trying to generalize it to all lesbians that get hit using a sample size of one. (Experiments was never my strong suit)
Most of the time it's creepy... but only because guys don't really know how to hit on people in a non-creepy way? I feel like this thread is derailed....I think it's flattering as long as they're not too persistent and it hurts my feelings a little if they don't find me attractive... which I'm assuming is what it's like for a lot of people.
I don't know if you're gay or not but assuming you're not, would you find it flattering if a gay man hit on you even if you weren't interested?
Most of the time it's creepy... but only because guys don't really know how to hit on people in a non-creepy way? I feel like this thread is derailed....
uhhh... something on topic: There are certain things in math that can't be proven... but are assumed to be true... and math works... so it doesn't really matter if we can't "prove math to 100% certainty". As long as the assumptions fit reality like in mathematics.
I mean you can't "prove" this external world exist but... there is no reason to assume otherwise... so we just assume this external world exist.
Hey, my ego's supposed to be on a diet
I like an ego with some meat on it's bones...none of those super thin unrealistic superegos for me. I mean its unnatural, I like an ego with some bootay!