Jeremy Mason
Well-Known Member
Is it possible for there to be one supreme meaning to life? And, if so, what is the logic or reasoning that would support the assertion there was one supreme meaning to life?
Put differently, on what reasonable basis, if any, can someone claim there is one supreme meaning to life? Or, is the notion there is one supreme meaning to life just an unfounded assumption?
Setting aside the human element for just a while, I say that the supreme meaning to life is creation and in a basic meaning, pro-creation. Cells, plants, animals and anything that can be perceived as functionally living is there because of it. Without the ability to secure future life, life, rhetorically speaking, would cease to exist. Even death provides life a means to sustain itself.