• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Can we trust the bible?

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
hardly balderdash. throughout history man has led/brainwashed people by way of religion

The comment was that God needs a book so that man can rule us through religion.

The fact that some people have ruled others through religious scare tactics is hardly the reason why the Bible was written. It certainly has happened, but that misuse is also certainly not the impetus for writing it and propagating the message, and to opine otherwise is provocative balderdash. The Bible was written to preserve the religious tradition of God's people.
 

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
There are some Christians that believe the Bible is inerrant and there are others who believe it has flaws in it. I have a comment for each group.

If you believe the Bible is perfect, then I would be interested to know if you've read the whole thing cover to cover. If God really did go through the trouble of revealing Himself through a book, you should probably read the entire thing. It's important.

If you believe the Bible is imperfect, then how can you trust anything in it that is said about Jesus Christ to be correct?

Again, it's not God that requires the book, but humanity. God can (and does) reveal God's self through one sentence of scripture.

While we're on the subject, would you please define for me just what "the entire thing" is??? The 66 books of the Protestant Bible? Does it include the Apocryphal writings, the exta-canonical writings of the NT, the Didache? The letters of the Church Fathers? The Papal bulls? What? What, exactly, is "The Entire Thing???"

Your second question: I don't trust the Bible to be correct about Jesus...I trust it to be revelatory about Jesus.

Your questions may be valid, but they appear to be cheap potshots. Might I suggest that, until you clearly understand what the Bible is, and what it means for the faithful, you refrain from assumptions.
 

Moey

Member
Your questions may be valid, but they appear to be cheap potshots. Might I suggest that, until you clearly understand what the Bible is, and what it means for the faithful, you refrain from assumptions.

Maybe that is what this thread is really about. You seem to be faithful so please, enlighten us.
 

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
Maybe that is what this thread is really about. You seem to be faithful so please, enlighten us.

I have told you. Have you heard all these things and still you do not understand?

I can't make the Bible be something for you other than what it is. Neither can you make the Bible something it is not. It is what it is. Either you accept it, or you do not.
 

Moey

Member
I can't make the Bible be something for you other than what it is. Neither can you make the Bible something it is not. It is what it is. Either you accept it, or you do not.

Is it really as simple as that?

I don't know why some people are getting so upset. Some of us are mearly asking questions and NOT taking potshots at anyone else. If we do not question how can we better understand anything?
 

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
Is it really as simple as that?

I don't know why some people are getting so upset. Some of us are mearly asking questions and NOT taking potshots at anyone else. If we do not question how can we better understand anything?

It really is that simple.

Some are not merely asking questions. They're making false assumptions and then rendering accusations, based upon those false assumptions, claiming that others are "misguided." Serious, valid questioning I embrace wholeheartedly, and will do my best to answer. Cheap potshots will garner only cheap sarcasm in return.

Let me just add that I'm just as hard on believers who insist upon the "God said it, I believe it, that settles it" approach. The Bible is a difficult thing for us to really get our minds around and be faithful to what it reveals. No matter what, we cannot make it be what we want it to be. It just simply is what it is: A collection of ancient, edited and (usually) translated documents written and understood from a culture (usually) far removed from our own. It is not infallible. It is not always factual. It is not a text book. It is not the truths contained therein that have made it stand the test of time, but the revelation it produces.

Can we trust the Bible factually? Not always. Can we trust it to be what it is? Always.
 

Prometheus

Semper Perconctor
While we're on the subject, would you please define for me just what "the entire thing" is??? The 66 books of the Protestant Bible? Does it include the Apocryphal writings, the exta-canonical writings of the NT, the Didache? The letters of the Church Fathers? The Papal bulls? What? What, exactly, is "The Entire Thing???"

You know those Bibles you find in hotels?

That.

My point is that any old Bible you find lying around will do. They are all God's word. Unless, you know for a fact that one version is more "revealing" than another. It doesn't really matter, though, since most people read the KJV.

Your second question: I don't trust the Bible to be correct about Jesus...I trust it to be revelatory about Jesus.

If you admit that the Bible has mistakes in it, you can't even be sure His name really is Jesus. I do recall that He was supposed to be called "Immanuel" at one point, but I guess the authors got a little mixed up.

Not to mention that the four gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John look like God decided He wanted to make the story of Jesus as inconsistent as possible. (Were there two angels at Christ's tomb, or just one?) In fact, every gospel, including Thomas and Judas, tells it differently. Which one is the right one? Jesus never even called Himself the messiah. At most He said He was "The Son of Man", whatever that means.

The moment you admit the Bible has factual inaccuracies, which you have, you admit you can be sure of nothing said in the Bible whatsoever. This includes everything you know about this Jesus character.

Your questions may be valid, but they appear to be cheap potshots. Might I suggest that, until you clearly understand what the Bible is, and what it means for the faithful, you refrain from assumptions.

Need I remind you I'm a former Christian? I know what faith is. I had it. Now I'm glad to be rid of it.
 

Moey

Member
The nature of god? What is that exactlly? I have been reading the KJV bible and have dicovered god to be vengful. Is that right?

I there a more "revealing" version out there?
 

Darkness

Psychoanalyst/Marxist
Moey said:
The nature of god? What is that exactlly? I have been reading the KJV bible and have dicovered god to be vengful. Is that right?

YHWH, the God of the Old Testament, is very vengeful and petty. YHWH will kill you for trying to stop His precious Ark from falling. He will kill you for believe in another God. He demands utterly blind obedience (Abraham willing to sacrifice Isaac), regardless of morality.

I am unsure of how I feel about the God of the New Testament. I am unsure if the New Testament teaches Eternal Damnation or Universal Reconciliation. Assuming it teaches Eternal Damnation, this Father God is only superficially better than YHWH. He preaches love and forgiveness, yet He will damn you to a torturous hell for all eternity. He is basically an abusive parent.
 

Mister Emu

Emu Extraordinaire
Staff member
Premium Member
I wonder, then, why there are so many denominations. It's obviously not clear enough.
For the most part, the varied denominations are split over the nature of worshipping the God described in the Bible.

The nature of god?
Yes.

What is that exactlly?
Trinitarian, Holy, Righteous, Just, Loving and much much more. ;)

I have been reading the KJV bible and have dicovered god to be vengful. Is that right?
I would say, yes.

I there a more "revealing" version out there?
I read the KJV, but I have no idea, I haven't really read much of others.
 
Top