Can you believe in the infallabilty of the bible?

[1robin]

then why did jesus not go to the augures and the collegium pontificum and perform miracles for them too?

That is what the Hebrews suffered in preperation to do. To make the soil fertile. The Greeks and Romans did the opposite. However he did send his apostles and their apostles to do just that. That was my parting shot I am out.

Shalom my emotional friend.

 

[waitasec]

That is what the Hebrews suffered in preperation to do. To make the soil fertile. The Greeks and Romans did the opposite. However he did send his apostles and their apostles to do just that. That was my parting shot I am out.

Shalom my emotional friend.

you didn't answer the question...
why did jesus the son of the creator of the universe not perform miracles for the romans....why assign that difficult task to his disciples?

 

[1robin]

you didn't answer the question...
why did jesus the son of the creator of the universe not perform miracles for the romans....why assign that difficult task to his disciples?

I don't know nor do I know why it matters? Why didn't he appear to every generation? Why didn't he appear to the penguins at the south pole? Why Why.......

 

[waitasec]

I don't know nor do I know why it matters? Why didn't he appear to every generation? Why didn't he appear to the penguins at the south pole? Why Why.......

apparently, you weren't paying attention ...

 

[1robin]

apparently, you weren't paying attention ...

I don't know that it would have helped and even if true was cerainly understandable.

 

[sojourner]

Good enough. Waitasec was wondering why I chose that one even though I said you said it was the most reliable. She is always suspicious of me. Is that a Katana in your avatar?

No. it's a Van's RV-10 homebuilt.

 

[waitasec]

I don't know that it would have helped and even if true was cerainly understandable.

had you paid attention to this

Nope. Because he challenged the status quo.

you would understand....

 

[1robin]

No. it's a Van's RV-10 homebuilt.

No wonder I could not identify it.

 

[1robin]

had you paid attention to this

you would understand....

So I am supposed to magically know that someone elses post applied to your claim. No wonder I didn't pay attention.

 

[waitasec]

So I am supposed to magically know that someone elses post applied to your claim.

you are supposed to know what the context is
and not just do a drive by ...





why would anyone be compelled to say apples are not oranges.

duh.


it's not magic...just click on the little arrow...and get a freakin' clue

 

[1robin]

you are supposed to know what the context is
and not just do a drive by ...

I don't read every post that is not directed at me. That is a silly expectation. I have many debates and many of them in-depth on other threadsat the same time and don't have time to read everyones post in every thread.

why would anyone be compelled to say apples are not oranges.

duh.

I don't even see what the relevance of the statement has when I did go back and read it as far as this discussion goes. You seem to have a conservation of energy mandate as a prime directive. Just make a complete sentence or two and complete the thought instead of half sentences, unrealistic expectations, thought fragments, and assumed sarcastic implecations.

it's not magic...just click on the little arrow...and get a freakin' clue

Didn't help.

 

[waitasec]

I don't read every post that is not directed at me. That is a silly expectation. I

if you expect to be taken seriously then perhaps you should do some homework and find out why a post was posted in the 1st place.

 

[1robin]

if you expect to be taken seriously then perhaps you should do some homework and find out why a post was posted in the 1st place.

These posts are all over the place. You read them all I won't.

 

[waitasec]

excuses are ugly

 

[1robin]

excuses are ugly

Point blank refusal is not an excuse.

 

[waitasec]

Point blank refusal is not an excuse.

so you refuse to understand context...? figures

 

[s2a]

Due to 2000 years of scribe errors between 300,000 and 400,000 different errors between ancient manuscripts including entire sections of Scripture not even in the oldest manuscripts, "the adulteress woman and mark 16:9 onward", how much can you trust the Bible?

I dont.

*I hear the collective thud of 10,000 dropping christian jaws as they hit the floor in that admission... *

 

[sojourner]

Due to 2000 years of scribe errors between 300,000 and 400,000 different errors between ancient manuscripts including entire sections of Scripture not even in the oldest manuscripts, "the adulteress woman and mark 16:9 onward", how much can you trust the Bible?

trust the bible to do what, exactly?

 

[ziggy2737]

Due to 2000 years of scribe errors between 300,000 and 400,000 different errors between ancient manuscripts including entire sections of Scripture not even in the oldest manuscripts, "the adulteress woman and mark 16:9 onward", how much can you trust the Bible?

Check out the true gnostic & you will get your answers.Those who have ears to hear------

 

[sojourner]

Check out the true gnostic & you will get your answers.Those who have ears to hear------

Perhaps it's not answers we seek, so much as it is greater questions.