That's what I want to know... it this theory somewhat sustained or not.
(When i say somewhat sustained, i mean that it is a possible scenario based on the scientific knowledge we have today.
The answer is
no because it's not at all based on the "scientific knowledge that we have today." That's my whole point. I'd challenge you supply said knowledge if you think I'm wrong.
New Age Mysticism, and other such hocus pocus, seems to get more of a pass in these conversations than the well-established religions and faiths because they add an air pseudoscience to their explanations and people somehow think that makes them more legitimate... But the problem here is no different than a theist arguing for a God of the Gaps... It just becomes a New Age Idea of the Gaps...
Just because there are some open-ended questions in a certain field of philosophy or physical science does not then mean that an omnipotent deity, or enlightened Chakra crystal healing powder, suddenly becomes more a legitimate explanation for that lack of knowledge.
God of the gaps - Wikipedia
Deepak Chopra, for example, is a wonderful example of this. He's a well spoken man who is quite intelligent and even has a decent amount of charisma. But his arguments, on the whole, are nonsense and based almost entirely on people's desire to have something magical in their lives than in actual scientific discovery. He's a mystical used car salesman. Another word for that could be charlatan.
If we replace gaps in knowledge with magical whimsy fairy tales of reliving our greatest regret, that can be fun. But it offers nothing in the way of being an argument for legitimacy.
