• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Challenge for atheists/ atheist position

Demonslayer

Well-Known Member
The best general argument I know for getting a theist to understand disbelief in their God is to list all the other Gods and ask them to consider their belief in those Gods.

Do you believe in:

Zeus?: No
Odin?: No
Ra?: No
Kokopelli?: No
Vishnu?: No
Horus? No
Poseidon? No
Apollo? No
1000 other: No

Yahweh?: Yes? Yes? You don't see that the only reason you answer yes to Yahweh was because you were fed a steady diet of mythology as a child? If you were born elsewhere, Yahweh would be a No and Visnhu would be a Yes.

When you come to realize this great truth, you realize men invent Gods and not the other way around. To persist that your God is real while all the others are fake is denial of the tallest order.
 

leibowde84

Veteran Member
I am interested in how you have reached your position of atheist, then. If you mean atheism in a broad sense, but admit that a broad argument cannot be presented against theism,... does this put into question, the surety of your atheistic position?
Arguments can easily be put up against all deities known to date. So, your point here is absurd. Your OP claim is merely too vague for any rational argument for or against. You have to define what kind of theism you are referring to. And, yes, the same would be necessary for a vague claim like atheism.
 

leibowde84

Veteran Member
Can you convince me that I'm incorrect in my theism? Here is the thing though, no help from me, you'll have to simply present your argument, or realize that you don't have an argument suitable, and pass on the challenge.
I'm an honest person, not religious, this isn't a ''trick'' question. Non atheists can answer to

/fun thread
You are asking us to convince you that your beliefs are wrong, but you refuse to explain what those beliefs are specifically?
 

George-ananda

Advaita Vedanta, Theosophy, Spiritualism
Premium Member
Can you convince me that I'm incorrect in my theism? Here is the thing though, no help from me, you'll have to simply present your argument, or realize that you don't have an argument suitable, and pass on the challenge.
I'm an honest person, not religious, this isn't a ''trick'' question. Non atheists can answer to

/fun thread
As a strong non-atheist myself, I agree with the atheists here in that you need to define your theism in more detail to conduct a debate. Just a point from someone on your side of the great divide.
 

George-ananda

Advaita Vedanta, Theosophy, Spiritualism
Premium Member

leibowde84

Veteran Member
From Wikipedia

Materialism
is a form of philosophical monism which holds that matter is the fundamental substance in nature, and that all phenomena, including mental phenomena and consciousness, are identical with material interactions.

What do atheists believe in that is not Materialism. I think a lot of people don't fully grasp the definition's meaning.
Karma, the power of positive thinking, Clair voyance, time, Deja Vu, morality due to societal evolution, etc.

The list is endless. All of the atheists I know personally are very spiritual people, heavy into the search for enlightenment. They just don't believe in God/gods.
 

dust1n

Zindīq
Can you convince me that I'm incorrect in my theism? Here is the thing though, no help from me, you'll have to simply present your argument, or realize that you don't have an argument suitable, and pass on the challenge.
I'm an honest person, not religious, this isn't a ''trick'' question. Non atheists can answer to

/fun thread

Can you convince me there isn't a notoriously evasive squirrel names Lars on the planet Mars? Here is the thing though, I'm not going to tell you anything about Lars at all. You'll have to simply present your argument, or realize that you don't have an argument suitable and pass on the challenge... challenge... challenge... challenge... I'm an honest person, totally not, like, all in love with Lars; just believe in him. No tricks here.
 

George-ananda

Advaita Vedanta, Theosophy, Spiritualism
Premium Member
Karma, the power of positive thinking, Clair voyance, time, Deja Vu, morality due to societal evolution, etc.

The list is endless. All of the atheists I know personally are very spiritual people, heavy into the search for enlightenment. They just don't believe in God/gods.
Well let's slow this down and address each thing on your list one at a time. Wouldn't you agree that if these things exist then there must be a mechanism by which they operate? Let's start with your first item 'Karma'. How do you think Karma operates? Is there some mysterious force that can determine subjectively what is good/bad and return good/bad? Most atheists would say 'No' to that last question.
 

Desert Snake

Veteran Member
As a strong non-atheist myself, I agree with the atheists here in that you need to define your theism in more detail to conduct a debate. Just a point from someone on your side of the great divide.
So, you are implying that ''theism'' hence atheism , by default, are meaningless terms, without signifiers, and specifications, etc. Even the broad context is not enough for people to present an argument. In this case, it is not ''theism'', that is being argued, then, is it? And if it's not theism, then it can't be ''atheism''. (literally)

/by the way, I did give some parameters, are those not specific enough, in your opinion?
 

George-ananda

Advaita Vedanta, Theosophy, Spiritualism
Premium Member
So, you are implying that ''theism'' hence atheism , by default, are meaningless terms, without signifiers, and specifications, etc. Even the broad context is not enough for people to present an argument. In this case, it is not ''theism'', that is being argued, then, is it? And if it's not theism, then it can't be ''atheism''. (literally)

/by the way, I did give some parameters, are those not specific enough, in your opinion?
So if they present an argument against the Christian God, this would not argue against 'theism'; just against the Christian God. How can they make an argument against every possible theism?
 

Desert Snake

Veteran Member
So if they present an argument against the Christian God, this would not argue against 'theism'; just against the Christian God. How can they make an argument against every possible theism?
This is very problematic, though, because if it is too specific, then it becomes semantic; for example, I am not going to have the same idea of the Xian God as many people, so then it becomes many arguments instead of a debate focused on the theism aspect.
 

Robert.Evans

You will be assimilated; it is His Will.
Can you convince me that I'm incorrect in my theism? Here is the thing though, no help from me, you'll have to simply present your argument, or realize that you don't have an argument suitable, and pass on the challenge.
I'm an honest person, not religious, this isn't a ''trick'' question. Non atheists can answer to

/fun thread
It appears so far that no one can do it. Worse still, it appears most don't seem to have a clue what it is they don't believe in.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
It appears so far that no one can do it. Worse still, it appears most don't seem to have a clue what it is they don't believe in.
There are so many things I don't believe in that it's hard to know where to start.
But his question didn't address this directly.
And it didn't require debunking his beliefs (whatever they are).
The actual question (with its accompanying prescriptions) is simple & easy to answer.
Can you convince me that I'm incorrect in my theism?
I cannot, because....
- No beliefs are presented.
- Even if he stated them, I presume he's heard arguments against them before,
& still holds the beliefs he holds. I doubt that I'd be able to offer anything different.
 
Last edited:

Koldo

Outstanding Member
This is very problematic, though, because if it is too specific, then it becomes semantic; for example, I am not going to have the same idea of the Xian God as many people, so then it becomes many arguments instead of a debate focused on the theism aspect.

But you did say 'Can you convince me that I'm incorrect in my theism?'.

That's VERY specific.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Can you convince me that I'm incorrect in my theism? Here is the thing though, no help from me, you'll have to simply present your argument, or realize that you don't have an argument suitable, and pass on the challenge.
I'm an honest person, not religious, this isn't a ''trick'' question. Non atheists can answer to

/fun thread
What's theism? ;0)
 

Demonslayer

Well-Known Member
So if they present an argument against the Christian God, this would not argue against 'theism'; just against the Christian God. How can they make an argument against every possible theism?

My answer is, because as an atheist all gods are the same to me. An argument against one is an argument against all. It's like explaining why you don't believe in fantasy creatures. You don't need one arugment for Goblins and another for Trolls and a third for Orcs. The reasoning behind your disbelief will be the same for all.
 
Top