leibowde84
Veteran Member
Yet another mystery that will be fun to try and figure out.It is amazing how an agnostic Christian can agree with a gnostic atheist. Our brain processes should be antipodal, shouldn't they? Lol.
Ciao
- viole
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Yet another mystery that will be fun to try and figure out.It is amazing how an agnostic Christian can agree with a gnostic atheist. Our brain processes should be antipodal, shouldn't they? Lol.
Ciao
- viole
Arguments can easily be put up against all deities known to date. So, your point here is absurd. Your OP claim is merely too vague for any rational argument for or against. You have to define what kind of theism you are referring to. And, yes, the same would be necessary for a vague claim like atheism.I am interested in how you have reached your position of atheist, then. If you mean atheism in a broad sense, but admit that a broad argument cannot be presented against theism,... does this put into question, the surety of your atheistic position?
You are asking us to convince you that your beliefs are wrong, but you refuse to explain what those beliefs are specifically?Can you convince me that I'm incorrect in my theism? Here is the thing though, no help from me, you'll have to simply present your argument, or realize that you don't have an argument suitable, and pass on the challenge.
I'm an honest person, not religious, this isn't a ''trick'' question. Non atheists can answer to
/fun thread
As a strong non-atheist myself, I agree with the atheists here in that you need to define your theism in more detail to conduct a debate. Just a point from someone on your side of the great divide.Can you convince me that I'm incorrect in my theism? Here is the thing though, no help from me, you'll have to simply present your argument, or realize that you don't have an argument suitable, and pass on the challenge.
I'm an honest person, not religious, this isn't a ''trick'' question. Non atheists can answer to
/fun thread
Well-put.As a strong non-atheist myself, I agree with the atheists here in that you need to define your theism in more detail to conduct a debate. Just a point from someone on your side of the great divide.
Thanks. But thinking about this further some atheists can argue for the truth of 'materialism' which would then exclude any type of theism. And most atheists are 'materialists'.Well-put.
Most atheists are not materialists. Where did you get that from?Thanks. But thinking about this further some atheists can argue for the truth of 'materialism' which would then exclude any type of theism. And most atheists are 'materialists'.
From WikipediaMost atheists are not materialists. Where did you get that from?
Karma, the power of positive thinking, Clair voyance, time, Deja Vu, morality due to societal evolution, etc.From Wikipedia
Materialism is a form of philosophical monism which holds that matter is the fundamental substance in nature, and that all phenomena, including mental phenomena and consciousness, are identical with material interactions.
What do atheists believe in that is not Materialism. I think a lot of people don't fully grasp the definition's meaning.
Can you convince me that I'm incorrect in my theism? Here is the thing though, no help from me, you'll have to simply present your argument, or realize that you don't have an argument suitable, and pass on the challenge.
I'm an honest person, not religious, this isn't a ''trick'' question. Non atheists can answer to
/fun thread
Well let's slow this down and address each thing on your list one at a time. Wouldn't you agree that if these things exist then there must be a mechanism by which they operate? Let's start with your first item 'Karma'. How do you think Karma operates? Is there some mysterious force that can determine subjectively what is good/bad and return good/bad? Most atheists would say 'No' to that last question.Karma, the power of positive thinking, Clair voyance, time, Deja Vu, morality due to societal evolution, etc.
The list is endless. All of the atheists I know personally are very spiritual people, heavy into the search for enlightenment. They just don't believe in God/gods.
So, you are implying that ''theism'' hence atheism , by default, are meaningless terms, without signifiers, and specifications, etc. Even the broad context is not enough for people to present an argument. In this case, it is not ''theism'', that is being argued, then, is it? And if it's not theism, then it can't be ''atheism''. (literally)As a strong non-atheist myself, I agree with the atheists here in that you need to define your theism in more detail to conduct a debate. Just a point from someone on your side of the great divide.
So if they present an argument against the Christian God, this would not argue against 'theism'; just against the Christian God. How can they make an argument against every possible theism?So, you are implying that ''theism'' hence atheism , by default, are meaningless terms, without signifiers, and specifications, etc. Even the broad context is not enough for people to present an argument. In this case, it is not ''theism'', that is being argued, then, is it? And if it's not theism, then it can't be ''atheism''. (literally)
/by the way, I did give some parameters, are those not specific enough, in your opinion?
This is very problematic, though, because if it is too specific, then it becomes semantic; for example, I am not going to have the same idea of the Xian God as many people, so then it becomes many arguments instead of a debate focused on the theism aspect.So if they present an argument against the Christian God, this would not argue against 'theism'; just against the Christian God. How can they make an argument against every possible theism?
It appears so far that no one can do it. Worse still, it appears most don't seem to have a clue what it is they don't believe in.Can you convince me that I'm incorrect in my theism? Here is the thing though, no help from me, you'll have to simply present your argument, or realize that you don't have an argument suitable, and pass on the challenge.
I'm an honest person, not religious, this isn't a ''trick'' question. Non atheists can answer to
/fun thread
There are so many things I don't believe in that it's hard to know where to start.It appears so far that no one can do it. Worse still, it appears most don't seem to have a clue what it is they don't believe in.
I cannot, because....Can you convince me that I'm incorrect in my theism?
This is very problematic, though, because if it is too specific, then it becomes semantic; for example, I am not going to have the same idea of the Xian God as many people, so then it becomes many arguments instead of a debate focused on the theism aspect.
What's theism? ;0)Can you convince me that I'm incorrect in my theism? Here is the thing though, no help from me, you'll have to simply present your argument, or realize that you don't have an argument suitable, and pass on the challenge.
I'm an honest person, not religious, this isn't a ''trick'' question. Non atheists can answer to
/fun thread