Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Don't be silly. I need to remind you that you do not understand the sciences at all.
Why did you run away from our conversation about the scientific method? We have barely covered anything.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Challenge for those that believe in billions of years for the age of things. Give anything that is more than 6000 years old. NO ASSUMPTIONS ALLOWED.
- Thread starter SavedByTheLord
- Start date
Why did you run away from our conversation about the scientific method? We have barely covered anything.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Wrong again. All you had was denial in response.
I am betting that you are afraid to try to learn too.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Why didn't you tell us that you had no idea what evidence was?
Let's go over the concept of evidence again.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
I have been studying this for over 20 years. I know all the lies of evolution and billions of years.
These false sciences, Atheistic Origin “Science“ (AOS) use the no God assumption in their conjectures.
Please prove that there is no God,
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No, you haven't been. Listening to liars and idiots from creationist sites is not studying. You only have lies of your own.
Once again, let's go over the basics of science. You do not understand even.those.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
You need remedial course in math, physics, chemistry, biology, and logic. Oh and basic conduct, Can you prove that these people are as you say “liars and idiots“?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Of course I can.
And please, you are at an elementary school level of scientific literacy. You are in no position to judge anyone.
Are you ready to learn? I can explain why they are wrong but you will not understand right now.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Here are some creation believing scientists who were Christian.
34 Great Scientists Who Were Committed Christians
Here are some of the greatest scientists in history who were also deeply committed to their Christian faiths. Robert Boyle 1627 – 1691. Said that a deeper understanding of science was a higher glorification of God. Defined elements, compounds, and mixtures. Discovered the first gas law - Boyle's...
Newton, probably smarter than you.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
I did by using the law of non contradiction. It is irrefutable.
I have more irrefutable proofs coming.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
None of those were creationists. You can't blame people from before Darwin's time for being ignorant.Here are some creation believing scientists who were Christian.
34 Great Scientists Who Were Committed Christians
Here are some of the greatest scientists in history who were also deeply committed to their Christian faiths. Robert Boyle 1627 – 1691. Said that a deeper understanding of science was a higher glorification of God. Defined elements, compounds, and mixtures. Discovered the first gas law - Boyle's...www.famousscientists.org
Newton, probably smarter than you.
And the ones after Darwin appear to accept reality. You really are new at this.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Not correctly. When you misapply a law of logic you refute yourself.
Copy it here or at least give me the post number.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
My other thread post #1
So Newton was a young earth creation believing scientist as were the other 33 mentioned in this link.
Were they idiots and liars?
34 Great Scientists Who Were Committed Christians
Here are some of the greatest scientists in history who were also deeply committed to their Christian faiths. Robert Boyle 1627 – 1691. Said that a deeper understanding of science was a higher glorification of God. Defined elements, compounds, and mixtures. Discovered the first gas law - Boyle's...
Heyo
Veteran Member
As @vulcanlogician has pointed out, with no assumption, nothing can be proven. Your claim of an 6000 year old Earth also relies on assumptions. To get to any conclusion we'd have to agree at least on some basic assumptions.
Do you agree that logic (as established by Aristotle) is a valid tool to come to correct statements based on agreed upon premises?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No, he had a valid excuse. The theory had not been developed yet. The term "creationist" refers to people.after Darwin's theory was published.
Yes, your failed list again. Which ironically has Georges Lemaitre on it. He was the original scientist that came up with the Big Bang Theory.34 Great Scientists Who Were Committed Christians
Here are some of the greatest scientists in history who were also deeply committed to their Christian faiths. Robert Boyle 1627 – 1691. Said that a deeper understanding of science was a higher glorification of God. Defined elements, compounds, and mixtures. Discovered the first gas law - Boyle's...
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
No assumptions by me at all. Just scientific facts and pure irrefutable logic.
More are on the way.
Heyo
Veteran Member
I did refute it. You have ignored that.
I will debunk those also (if you are just regurgitating other PRATTs).
If you have some new proof, I'm interested.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Please do not tell such obvious falsehoods.
Sgt. Pepper
All you need is love.
In my opinion, the only thing that the OP has proven in this thread is their ignorance of science, logic, and the concept of evidence.