Challenge for Those that believe that the World is more than 1 second old. Prove it! No assumptions allowed!

[ChristineM]

Yeah, but they have a book. Checkmate atheist!

Yeah, a book...

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Yeah, a book...

View attachment 83799

since they disagree at most only one can be true.

 

[Subduction Zone]

since they disagree at most only one can be true.

And we al know that your beliefs cannot be one of the true ones.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

And we al know that your beliefs cannot be one of the true ones.

Of course it is.
This could not have evolved,

Figure 6-76, The rescue of a bacterial ribosome stalled on an incomplete mRNA molecule - Molecular Biology of the Cell - NCBI Bookshelf

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Of course it is.
This could not have evolved,

Figure 6-76, The rescue of a bacterial ribosome stalled on an incomplete mRNA molecule - Molecular Biology of the Cell - NCBI Bookshelf

Please explain what this link shows us.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Of course it is.
This could not have evolved,

Figure 6-76, The rescue of a bacterial ribosome stalled on an incomplete mRNA molecule - Molecular Biology of the Cell - NCBI Bookshelf

As usual, I would expect a comprehensive answer from a Christian.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Of course it is.
This could not have evolved,

Figure 6-76, The rescue of a bacterial ribosome stalled on an incomplete mRNA molecule - Molecular Biology of the Cell - NCBI Bookshelf

A mere unsupported statement is of no value.

 

[Subduction Zone]

As usual, I would expect a comprehensive answer from a Christian.

He is in mourning. He just found out his God no longer exists because Eric ate him:

"God can't exist because of Eric The God-Eating Magic Penguin. Since Eric is God-Eating by definition, he has no choice but to eat God. So, if God exists, He automatically ceases to exist as a result of being eaten. Unless you can prove that Eric doesn't exist, God doesn't exist. Even if you can prove that Eric doesn't exist, that same proof will also be applicable to God. There are only two possibilities - either you can prove that Eric doesn't exist or you can't - in both cases it logically follows that God doesn't exist."

 

[SavedByTheLord]

He is in mourning. He just found out his God no longer exists because Eric ate him:

"God can't exist because of Eric The God-Eating Magic Penguin. Since Eric is God-Eating by definition, he has no choice but to eat God. So, if God exists, He automatically ceases to exist as a result of being eaten. Unless you can prove that Eric doesn't exist, God doesn't exist. Even if you can prove that Eric doesn't exist, that same proof will also be applicable to God. There are only two possibilities - either you can prove that Eric doesn't exist or you can't - in both cases it logically follows that God doesn't exist."

And Satan deceives many.

 

[Subduction Zone]

And Satan deceives many.

Yes, thanks for admitting that you were deceived.

 

[shunyadragon]

Ah..but there is no pipe...only the smoke.

. . . only from the burning of perforated rolls.

 

[shunyadragon]

since they disagree at most only one can be true.

since there are so many contradictory diverse ancient tribal beliefs and books attested to by fallible humans without objective evidence it is more likely they are all wrong.

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

That is the best answer yet from the evolutionists.

Don't you have a bunch of threads of your own to play in?

 

[shunyadragon]

And Satan deceives many.

Belief in a mythical figure from ancient scripture causing scientists to be deceived concerning evolution is about as bizarre as you can get. I can see that you believe that everyone who does not believe as you do is deceived by Satan.

 

[Audie]

As usual, I would expect a comprehensive answer from a Christian.

Thing is that with religion, you
get to just say things.

 

[Audie]

Belief in a mythical figure from ancient scripture causing scientists to be deceived concerning evolution is about as bizarre as you can get. I can see that you believe that everyone who does not believe as you do is deceived by Satan.

Ha. I can get bizarrer.

The excess water from flood was wafted to
Neptune, where it shines to this day as a
warnijg beacon against incoming rogue
angels.

Source available on request

 

[ChristineM]

Ha. I can get bizarrer.

The excess water from flood was wafted to
Neptune, where it shines to this day as a
warnijg beacon against incoming rogue
angels.

Source available on request

ROFLMAO

 

[Audie]

Ha. I can get bizarrer.

The excess water from flood was wafted to
Neptune, where it shines to this day as a
warnijg beacon against incoming rogue
angels.

Source available on request

How long would a person spend thinking
about. " flood" to come up with that?

Does religion sometimes make people
crazy or is it vice versa?

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

How long would a person spend thinking
about. " flood" to come up with that?

Does religion sometimes make people
crazy or is it vice versa?

I think, in fact, that religion quite often forces people to search for -- and often accept -- any plausible explanation for phenomena that incorporates their core belief, and to reject explanations, no matter how well justified, that do not. Thus, it is necessary to reject abiogenesis and evolution because they do not include "God created the world." The beginning of Genesis 1, unlike the scientific theory, does include God, and that makes it sound much more plausible, in their minds.

For the same reason, it is very difficult for the religious to accept death. They have never "experienced" death -- none of us has, nor possibly can, because death includes the absence of all experience. This is therefore unknowable and unthinkable, even when they are asked "what were you doing 5 years before you were born?" And therefore the religious notion that there is something of us that survives death gets incorporated. Whether this survival is in a heaven, or in a "land of shadows" or Hades, or repeated reincarnations hardly matters, but most religions have some version of it.

 

[Audie]

I think, in fact, that religion quite often forces people to search for -- and often accept -- any plausible explanation for phenomena that incorporates their core belief, and to reject explanations, no matter how well justified, that do not. Thus, it is necessary to reject abiogenesis and evolution because they do not include "God created the world." The beginning of Genesis 1, unlike the scientific theory, does include God, and that makes it sound much more plausible, in their minds.

For the same reason, it is very difficult for the religious to accept death. They have never "experienced" death -- none of us has, nor possibly can, because death includes the absence of all experience. This is therefore unknowable and unthinkable, even when they are asked "what were you doing 5 years before you were born?" And therefore the religious notion that there is something of us that survives death gets incorporated. Whether this survival is in a heaven, or in a "land of shadows" or Hades, or repeated reincarnations hardly matters, but most religions have some version of it.

"Plausible" is the wrong word.
Try " specious".