SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Please refute. It should by easy for someone with your bold empty claims.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Challenge for Those that believe that the World is more than 1 second old. Prove it! No assumptions allowed!
- Thread starter sayak83
- Start date
McBell
Unbound
There is nothing to refute.
I stated proven facts.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Those proven facts refute evolution as I have proved many times.
McBell
Unbound
You seem confused.
Perhaps you should go back and read what you replied to, then read your reply.
Hopefully you will see what you did wrong.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Please refute it will be fun.
Also did you meet the challenge?
How did that first living creature carry out osmosis and diffusio?
McBell
Unbound
Please say you did not even try to figure out where you went wrong...
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Where did the first living creature come into being at?
McBell
Unbound
Earth
Which version of the Bible is Gods Produced version?
Where? I have not received any reply alerts. Which posts did you use to prove without assumptions that the world is more than 1 second old.
Wrong thread. Please stay on topic.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
For English, the King James Bible.
which is the one official answer book where it states what was the first living creature?
McBell
Unbound
Official for whom?
Did you know that the Textus Receptus, from which the KJV was translated, was based on half a dozen small manuscripts, none earlier than the 10th century?
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Actually there are many thousands of manuscripts and other fragments, etc which are all consistent with the King James Bible, some going back to the first century and many to the second century.
Terrywoodenpic
Oldest Heretic
Before we can consider ONE second
We need to consider the nature of time itself
Does it flow
Does it have a vector.
Or is it fixed and complete.with a beginning and end
And With fixed boundaries
Is it one two or three dimensional
Can we enter it at any point.
How does it relate to energy, the building blocks of everything.
How does it relate at the quantum level where chance and uncertainty rules.
We need to consider the nature of time itself
Does it flow
Does it have a vector.
Or is it fixed and complete.with a beginning and end
And With fixed boundaries
Is it one two or three dimensional
Can we enter it at any point.
How does it relate to energy, the building blocks of everything.
How does it relate at the quantum level where chance and uncertainty rules.
McBell
Unbound
Oh crap.
I did not realize this thread was the one second version of all the other threads with the almost identical names....
Old age. Thus proving the world is older than 1 second. Well done.
Ok....let's forget time. Prove without assumptions that the world existed more than an eyeblink ago.
Did anyone else just keep their eyes open as long as they could to see how long they could stay alive?Ok....let's forget time. Prove without assumptions that the world existed more than an eyeblink ago.
PoetPhilosopher
Veteran Member
If the world was more than 1 second old.... cats would have pushed everything off by now