Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Depends where the atoms end up.Even though there is no such thing as hell, if there were, do you think Charles is there?
And do you think he SHOULD go there?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Depends where the atoms end up.Even though there is no such thing as hell, if there were, do you think Charles is there?
And do you think he SHOULD go there?
Even though there is no such thing as hell, if there were, do you think Charles is there?
And do you think he SHOULD go there?
Even though there is no such thing as hell, if there were, do you think Charles is there?
And do you think he SHOULD go there?
There is no eternal hell, but the lower astral regions where Charles is probably gone can be pretty hellish. He is probably sharing that region with Nazis and serial killers and other dregs of dead humanity. He will probably spend a long time there (may feel like an eternity) until the Gods decide where he should be born next. His next life could even be on another planet which suits his temperament better.Even though there is no such thing as hell, if there were, do you think Charles is there?
And do you think he SHOULD go there?
Of course, that's only useful when it can change behaviours for the better. Suffering in hell ONLY FOR THE SAKE OF SUFFERING is utterly useless, and something only a god -- or frightened, vengeful, unforgiving humans -- could think up.You made my argument for me. The feedback is by experiencing the suffering you inflicted on others so that you understand the consequences on others of your actions.
Charles Manson was mentally ill.Even though there is no such thing as hell, if there were, do you think Charles is there?
And do you think he SHOULD go there?
I can disagree with the concept of something without believing that it exists. Geeks do it all the time with Star Trek.Why are skeptics and humanists arguing with apparent "righteous indignation" that hell shouldn't exist - as if it does?
My guess is that Mr. Manson has been in "Hell" for many many years already. I see no point in perpetuating his suffering beyond what he has already endured.Even though there is no such thing as hell, if there were, do you think Charles is there?
And do you think he SHOULD go there?
Well one thing's for certain, its proven enough to see that it's all pure conjecture. ;0)Can you prove there isn't one?
Well one thing's for certain, its proven enough to see that it's all pure conjecture. ;0)
It's always practical to follow things to its source. People's imaginations seems to be where its all coming from.how?
It's always practical to follow things to its source. People's imaginations seems to be where its all coming from.
That is what I said.
What if you gave me a more reasonable hypothetical? I don't see how that could happen with anyone if I were to grant the hypothetical scenario of infinite time in an afterlife.Oh yeah was just making sure. But regardless, what if the person never learns from their mistakes and continues to commit the crimes?
In this thread hell exists ex hypothesi.Why are skeptics and humanists arguing with apparent "righteous indignation" that hell shouldn't exist - as if it does?
One could say that's all it is.But isn't it conjecture on your part to assume something you've never experienced does not exist?
No. There will probably be a review exposing the suffering he caused, an analysis of what went so wrong, an adjustment period, etc..Even though there is no such thing as hell, if there were, do you think Charles is there?
And do you think he SHOULD go there?