It doesn't sound bad. Also I think you should not be expected to answer questions from strangers about your income, level of education, position, your marriage status, number of children and other personal items. In some places it is common to ask these things and more polite to lie than to refuse. I prefer rather than lying to not be asked by strangers.
I somewhat disagree, and I definitely see a strong downside to that state of things. People are IMO entitled to some measure of warning of what to expect from other people's values and ideologies, including the religious.
Actively hiding those borders on hostility and disrespect. At the very least, it denies people the opportunity to prepare for delicate situations.
Do you feel that is hypocrisy?
Nope. It is not hypocrisy per se, and there is an upside of inclusiveness and acceptance to it.
All the same, it may encourage and enable hypocritical attitudes that should IMO be actively avoided. No one is doing me any favors by presuming anything about my beliefs without my input.
There is definitely a place for such inclusiveness, and I am grateful for it. But it does require a complemental effort of pointing out that people have their own minds, their own beliefs, and conformity should not be expected nor taken for granted.
Its possible, but it could be that in order to avoid conflict people have stopped talking about it. It reminds me of how people tend to clump into tribes that don't talk to each other. Go to a diverse university campus, and you will see this clumping. You will see many individuals walking alone speaking with no one, and you will see small groups talking together. What you will not see are random strangers constantly talking to everyone they can.
Word reached me that at least some schools actively avoid keeping brothers in the same classroom, presumably because there is value in mixing a bit and encouraging wider awareness and acceptance of other people.
While that is a very different situation from that of inclusive religious services, I think that some of the same concerns apply. There is such a thing as being too confortable with an environment.
My extended family is separated by long distances. I barely know any cousins but have many. My approach has been to try to be honest with siblings, but I don't speak to them frequently about religion and not with cousins at all. I have not tried to educate their kids about my own opinions, either. Its not my place to interfere in the rearing of children that I barely have any responsibility for.
Admittedly, I have a bit of a fringe opinion on this matter. Still, I think that what you describe here is a significantly different situation. If you have reason to expect to have very eventual and distant contact with people, it stands to reason that there is comparatively lesser reason to worry about your impact on them, and vice-versa.
What I am describing is a situation where there is reason to expect frequent exposure, but also an expectation of a measure of obfuscation and silence that I find quite excessive, if not abusive.
I don't think it is even all that different from the very natural desire to know a bit about the personal background of people who one deal with often, particularly when one's children are a part of that exposure. You will want to know about their families, places of origin, occupations and goals. Why would it be any different about their religious views and goals, if any?
Last edited: