madhatter85
Transhumanist
There is a difference between "the only christian Faith" and "the one true church."
not when chrisitans claim that Jesus Isn't who he said he was.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
There is a difference between "the only christian Faith" and "the one true church."
That's absolute nonsense! I've never in my life heard a General Authority say that we're the only Christian faith. That's one you're definitely going to have to give us a verbatim quote for. You are misrepresenting everything our leaders have said for generations upon generations.The thing is we identify ourselves As the only chrisitan Faith. all other churches are Trinitarians
You're right. The rest of Christianity should insist to identify with us.
No. I'm serious. Since we are the true church they should try to become as close to us as possible.
*silence*
Chuckle, what an astonishingly arrogant statement, claiming superiority now in every respect. I'm not a Christian any longer, but if I were, I'd hope my Church distanced itself as much as possible from the LDS.
Melissa G
Congratuations! Your wish has come true!I'm not a Christian any longer, but if I were, I'd hope my Church distanced itself as much as possible from the LDS.
It is an arrogant statement.Chuckle, what an astonishingly arrogant statement, claiming superiority now in every respect. I'm not a Christian any longer, but if I were, I'd hope my Church distanced itself as much as possible from the LDS.
Melissa G
Sola'lor said:You're right. The rest of Christianity should insist to identify with us.
No. I'm serious. Since we are the true church they should try to become as close to us as possible.
First off, I think Sola'lor's statement was made partially tongue in cheek. When you get right down to it, it would be nuts for any other Christian denomination to want to become as close (doctrinally speaking) to us as possible -- or for us to want to become as close to them as possible. Why should anyone want to identify with something they do not accept as true? To the extent that other Christian denominations teach the truth, (that Jesus is the Christ and the Son of God, that we could not be forgiven of our sins without Him, and that God loves each of us and wants us to return to Him), I have no problem identifying with them. To the extent that they believe that we teach the truth, they probably have no problem identifying with us either. What I see as a problem is the refusal (on both sides) to admit that, in spite of our differences, we also have a lot in common.It is an arrogant statement.
However, it falls into line with the likes of Peter S Ruckman, Texxe Marres, Bin Laden, etc.
I think you're right about that, too. There are a couple of pretty arrogant Latter-day Saints on RF, but I don't believe they are representative of members of the Church as a whole.however, to pass judgment on a group because of the words/actions/beliefs of a few is also rather arrogant.
First off, I think Sola'lor's statement was made partially tongue in cheek. When you get right down to it, it would be nuts for any other Christian denomination to want to become as close (doctrinally speaking) to us as possible -- or for us to want to become as close to them as possible. Why should anyone want to identify with something they do not accept as true? To the extent that other Christian denominations teach the truth, (that Jesus is the Christ and the Son of God, that we could not be forgiven of our sins without Him, and that God loves each of us and wants us to return to Him), I have no problem identifying with them. To the extent that they believe that we teach the truth, they probably have no problem identifying with us either. What I see as a problem is the refusal (on both sides) to admit that, in spite of our differences, we also have a lot in common.
I think you're right about that, too. There are a couple of pretty arrogant Latter-day Saints on RF, but I don't believe they are representative of members of the Church as a whole.
not when chrisitans claim that Jesus Isn't who he said he was.
Hmmm....makes me wonder: Am I a liberal or a slacker?
Did you ever see this thread: Mormons -- Only 5 Kinds?Hmmm....makes me wonder: Am I a liberal or a slacker?
I think that many may misinterpret our effort to be seen as Chirstian as an effort to be with mainstream christianity. We are still fighting the battle of trying to be seen as Christians. So ofcourse we want to identify with other Christian religions. And say hey where christians just like you guys are.
There is clearly a gap between what LDS and other Christians believe regarding the nature of the Godhead, the necessity of Priesthood, what is the New Testament church, what is the relationship between God and man, the eternal destiny of man, and more. Yet, despite the gaps, I still accept those who do not see it my way as Christians. I honestly don't understand why some other Christians do not give me the same benefit of the doubt, despite our differences.
Hmmm....makes me wonder: Am I a liberal or a slacker?
Liblacker?A slackeral?
It is because the differences are so profound that it can only be said that Mormons and Catholics worship two different Creators, have two different Saviors, are animated by two different Spirits.
So, we don't worship a different God or Savior. We worship the same God and Savior, but we have different ideas of what He/They are like.
I must have gotten my idea of another Christ and another Spirit from reading Second Corinthians, one of the great overlooked epistles.
2 Cor 11:[3] But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ. [4] For if he that cometh preacheth another Jesus, whom we have not preached, or if ye receive another spirit, which ye have not received, or another gospel, which ye have not accepted, ye might well bear with him.
I must have gotten my idea of another Christ and another Spirit from reading Second Corinthians, one of the great overlooked epistles.
2 Cor 11:[3] But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ. [4] For if he that cometh preacheth another Jesus, whom we have not preached, or if ye receive another spirit, which ye have not received, or another gospel, which ye have not accepted, ye might well bear with him.