They don't confirm that, but thanks for your consideration.
No worries....feel free to ignore the very scriptures that confirm the fact that you are mistaken...heaven forbid that you could make such an admission....
Paul didn't think it was separate. He forbade Judaizers to circumcise gentiles
Again, you are showing how little you know of scripture. All Gentiles who wanted to come into a relationship with Israel's God had to be circumcised. For that reason, Paul did not forbid the circumcision of Gentiles per se...what the Christian elders in Jerusalem affirmed was that there was no need to circumcise Gentiles who became Christians, since they were not converting to Judaism. (Acts 15:5, 6, 28, 29) Circumcision was for Jews only. Paul circumcised Timothy before taking him on a preaching tour. Timothy was not circumcised because his Father was Greek, not Jewish. Paul performed the circumcision so as not to stumble the Jews to whom they preached. (Acts 16:3)
Paul never clarified any spiritual dimension to it.
Again, I believe that you are in error.
The apostle Paul, in arguing that the Jews were mistaken in their pride of fleshly descent and in relying on the works of the Law to find favor with God, said: “For he is not a Jew who is one on the outside, nor is circumcision that which is on the outside upon the flesh. But he is a Jew who is one on the inside, and his circumcision is that of the heart by spirit, and not by a written code. The praise of that one comes, not from men, but from God.” (Romans 2:28, 29)
Are you yet going to ignore the evidence? In your ignorance, you keep shooting yourself in the foot. Why profess to be so knowledgeable about the Bible, when it is clear that you knowledge is completely lacking.
Hopefully you are a better Buddhist than you were a Christian.....
Are these your own ideas or have you borrowed them from someone else?