All of Genesis is a great mythological background for a people and their religion. But those people are the Jews. Why do Baha'is take some of the things as real and true, especially prophecy, and other things that contradict their beliefs as traditions of men or symbolic? The meaning of the sacrifice to the Jews needs to have Isaac and that is what their Scriptures say. Persian and Arabic religions prefer it to be Ishmael. Hmmm? I wonder why?
So for the Baha'is to be correct in this, all copies of the Torah that had Ishmael would have to have been destroyed. All copies from then on would have to have Isaac. All religious leaders and scribes would have to be in on it. And all of them, and all the people that knew of the supposed "original" teaching would have to be in on the secret. Really? Baha'is say that the next manifestation in line correct the mistakes and superstitious beliefs of the previous religion. Why didn't Jesus mention it. And why did God "inspire" the NT writers to pretend it was Isaac?
The link to a provisional translation of a section of a Tablet from Baha'u'llah explaining this was posted above, here that is in full;
Excerpt Tablet to Hájí Mírzá Kamálu'd-Dín: By Bahá'u'lláh - translated by
Iskandar Hai.2002
Originally revealed as "Lawh-i-Hájí Mírzá Kamalu'd-Dín". first written or published 1878
"...The question is that whereas in past Scriptures
[1][2] Isaac is said to have been the sacrifice;
[3] in the Qur’án
[4] this station is given to Ishmael.
[5] This is, undoubtedly, true. All, however, must fix their gaze upon the word which hath dawned from the Divine Horizon:
[6] it is incumbent upon every soul to ponder upon its sovereignty, influence, might, and on its all-encompassing nature. There hath never been any doubt whatsoever that all these things are confirmed and corroborated only by the Word of God. It is the Word of God that transcendeth all things, creates the universe, educateth the people, guideth them who are sore athirst from separation unto the ocean of reunion, and penetrateth through the darkness of ignorance with the light of understanding. Consider: all those who believe in past Scriptures
[7] think of Isaac as the Sacrifice; likewise, the people of Qur’án
[8] confirm this station for Ishmael. It is clear and evident to every possessor of insight and every religious person that no one was, outwardly
[9] sacrificed; all agree that an animal was sacrificed. So, ponder upon this: Why is it that a person who hath gone to the altar of sacrifice for the Beloved and yet hath come back [alive], is adorned with the raiment of ‘Sacrifice of God’ and accepted
[10] as such? There is no doubt that this is so because of the Word of God. Therefore, the criterion
[11] for the manifestation of all names and for confirmation and fulfillment of all stations is dependent upon the Word of God.
[12] Likewise, there is no doubt, that the Inaccessible, Unknowable [God] doth not talk as He is, and hath always been, sanctified from such conditions; rather, He speaketh through the tongue of His Manifestations.
[13] Thus the Torah issued from the tongue of Moses. The same is true of other Holy Scriptures: all were revealed by the tongues of Prophets and Messengers but, the real Speaker
[14] in all these Holy Books is the One true God.... It is now, therefore, established and confirmed that the station of ‘Sacrifice of God’ was, according to past Books,
[15] given to Isaac by Abraham and that very same station is, according to Divine Revelation, Ishmael’s in the Qur’ánic Dispensation.
[16]..."
Note it is a 'Station' Given to Issac in the bible and to Ishmael in the Koran and Baha'i Writings.
Thus they both shared this 'Station'. It did not happen, but the bounty was given to both of them.
Regards Tony