Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Neither nativity scene nor sign should have been erected/posted outside of the legislative building, in my opinion.
I couldn't agree more. A governmental building should be kept for governmental purposes, and not be used to place decorations for a holiday. Government and religion need to be kept separate in order to keep true to this nation's foundation and creation which is freedom of religion. To me this means you have the freedom to believe in what ever you wish and should not have a fear of any retribution of any sort from any private or public entity. When there are decorations placed outside of a governmental facility, there is a sort of proclimation that is stating that the governmental establishment in which it is placed is part of this particular religion. This is not fair. And to further this the person in which took the sign that had every right to be there, just as much (in my opinion, more so) than the nativity, is a hypocrite and lives by double standards. I have seen this time and time again in religions (the people in them), the old do as I say not as I do scenario, it's frustrating!
Christmas doesn't bother me. What bothers me is the people who think it's exclusively Christian, which shows an ignorance of the actual origins and history of Christmas. The date was originally a pagan celebration long before some pope decided to declare Christ's birthday be celebrated on that day, and the vast majority of Christmas traditions are of pagan origin
I always thought Christmas was celebrated on December 25th because it was tradition that Christ was conceived on the Spring equinox of March 25th?
There is no greater or lessor sin. All sin that is unforgiven will have the same result.
If a Christian was going to steal the sign, they might as well have shot the Atheist that displayed it.
Before you all form a lynch mob for me, the proper thing to do in this situation was nothing IMHO.
Agreed. I did find it quite condescending.If you put up a sign that snide and condescending, you should be prepared for it to be defaced. I'm not a Christian, and I would have vandalized it for the sheer pompousness of the people that wrote it.
:clapFrubalsIf you put up a sign that snide and condescending, you should be prepared for it to be defaced. I'm not a Christian, and I would have vandalized it for the sheer pompousness of the people that wrote it.
"It's not that we are trying to coerce anyone; in a way our sign is a signal of protest," Barker said. "If there can be a Nativity scene saying that we are all going to hell if we don't bow down to Jesus, we should be at the table to share our views."