1robin
Christian/Baptist
Ok, then that is that.Seriously? It was clearly a no. And the cosmological argument has been refuted to the point of no return. The argument is based upon a special pleading fallacy.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Ok, then that is that.Seriously? It was clearly a no. And the cosmological argument has been refuted to the point of no return. The argument is based upon a special pleading fallacy.
If you like I could link a few videos that go into depth on this.Ok, then that is that.
Name 3I have a question for you. If homosexuality is a biological fact (though the behavior is definitely a choice) that we can't escape how is it that so many professing homosexuals became heterosexuals after seeking (Christian) counseling?
Your own words make my point for me. Look below at those words. The things you compare it with are theft, murder, slavery, "behavior destructive on an industrial scale," even your use of the term "existence of a problem," whether you know how to fix it or not.Where in the world did you get the idea that I fear or hate homosexuals. That does not even make sense. This is identity politics at its worst.
Theft and murder hurt people. Why do you suppose that me making love to my partner (who really wants me to) hurts anybody? Does it hurt you? Did you feel a tremor in the force last time we got it on? WHAT IS IT TO YOU? WHY DO YOU BOTHER TALKING ABOUT IT?Why would you think I deny the existence of homosexuals? Saying something exists does in no way imply that their existence is justifiable. Theft exists, murder exists, and slavery exists does that mean they should be accepted? Your really mangling your understanding of my positions.
Behaviour on an industrial scale. I say again -- the vast majority of people in the world are heterosexual, and they did NOT get it through gay sex. Therefore, the only place your argument can go is to require all sexual activity, all over the world, to cease.I like the way you guys ask me a question then assume you know the answer before I have a chance to provide it. I made no recommendation as to what should be done about homosexuality. I simply pointed out the behavior is destructive on an industrial scale. It is easy to point out the existence of a problem without any need to know what the solution should be. Laziness is a problem even if I have no idea how to end it.
Homosexual orientation is also not a choice. And once again, you make yourself abundantly clear about where you stand by making the comparison to murderers and thieves. Where in the world did I get the idea that you fear or hate homosexuals? From you.Most physical disabilities are not choices. Being born retarded is usually not the persons fault.
You can't make homosexuality right no matter how many other things you try and condemn. You can't get your murderous client off by pointing out that others are thieves.
Are you suggested that within the past 2000 years there have not been 3 people who embraced heterosexuality after having identified as a homosexual. I might know 3 personally. Do I really have to demonstrate something that is self evident?you
Name 3
You win. Since I can't convert, I'll go kill myself. I've no doubt you'd approve. I shall have nothing more to do with you, because you spend all your effort looking not for reality but for what supports what you wish to be true. The fact is, there are a tiny, tiny few who try to convert, and only because their religious communities, rather than loving them, give them so much guilt and hate they don't know what else to do. But if you were to actually look into the literature, you would also find -- though your religiously based sources will never tell you so -- that almost all such conversions wind up being failures.Are you suggested that within the past 2000 years there have not been 3 people who embraced heterosexuality after having identified as a homosexual. I might know 3 personally. Do I really have to demonstrate something that is self evident?
Do People Change from Homosexuality? Hundreds of Stories of Hope and Transformation (Part I)
I did not compare homosexuality to any other crime. I mentioned those thing as things that exist but are not acceptable imply because they exist. That in no way lumps homosexuality and criminal behavior. Your intentionally misusing my analogy. I am the greatest possible expert on my own views, far better than yourself and I do not fear nor hate homosexuals and I resent the accusation. If you keep using this insinuation I will no longer continue our discussion.Your own words make my point for me. Look below at those words. The things you compare it with are theft, murder, slavery, "behavior destructive on an industrial scale," even your use of the term "existence of a problem," whether you know how to fix it or not.
How carefully I listen is determined by the quality of your argument not be demands that I should.Listen very carefully -- my homosexuality is NOT A PROBLEM. Not for me, not for my life partner, not for anybody anywhere. I have no diseases, I do nothing to anyone that they do not want. Yet, you call me a "problem." That's your term, not mine. You have spoken for yourself.
So does homosexuality but that does not make them co-equal with each other. Saying so is all on you, not me.Theft and murder hurt people.
I am not condemning any specific homosexual's experience, I am discussing a type of generalized behavior that humanity as a whole in many ways. There is simply no possible way homosexuality's costs are justified by it's benefits. I am the one trying to stop those people from dying, your the one suggesting that the behavior that does this a virtue.Why do you suppose that me making love to my partner (who really wants me to) hurts anybody? Does it hurt you? Did you feel a tremor in the force last time we got it on? WHAT IS IT TO YOU? WHY DO YOU BOTHER TALKING ABOUT IT?
Anything that potentially costs me money and increases over all suffering is my business but I have not suggesting any particular action. I don't need to know how to fix my car to see it is malfunctioning. I don't have to have the solution to point out the problem. First steps first.Because you want us to stop, that's why. And frankly, it is none of your bloody business.
I didn't say anything about behavior on an industrial scale I was talking about suffering and death on an industrial scale. Your making a career out of misrepresenting my claims.Behaviour on an industrial scale. I say again -- the vast majority of people in the world are heterosexual, and they did NOT get it through gay sex. Therefore, the only place your argument can go is to require all sexual activity, all over the world, to cease.
You don't know this because you can't. However I am not condemning the orientation. I am condemning homosexual sex which is 100% choice. I have to spend 80% of my time trying to straighten out your misrepresentations of my claims.Homosexual orientation is also not a choice. And once again, you make yourself abundantly clear about where you stand by making the comparison to murderers and thieves. Where in the world did I get the idea that you fear or hate homosexuals? From you.
I did not compare homosexuality to any other crime. I mentioned those thing as things that exist but are not acceptable imply because they exist. That in no way lumps homosexuality and criminal behavior. Your intentionally misusing my analogy. I am the greatest possible expert on my own views, far better than yourself and I do not fear nor hate homosexuals and I resent the accusation. If you keep using this insinuation I will no longer continue our discussion.
I have said over and over that I am judging a behavior not a person. How well (or not) your personal experience with homosexuality is working out is irrelevant. Please take all the seething emotion out of your posts, it doesn't apply.
I am not condemning any specific homosexual's experience, I am discussing a type of generalized behavior that humanity as a whole in many ways. There is simply no possible way homosexuality's costs are justified by it's benefits. I am the one trying to stop those people from dying, your the one suggesting that the behavior that does this a virtue.
You don't know this because you can't. However I am not condemning the orientation. I am condemning homosexual sex which is 100% choice. I have to spend 80% of my time trying to straighten out your misrepresentations of my claims.
What on God's green earth are you talking about? Has your emotional commitment to your position overwhelmed your ability to reason? I never suggested you do anything. Why are you melting down?You win. Since I can't convert, I'll go kill myself.
I can not have a guy who I merely disagree with try and blame me for his own misery. Either stop this absurd appeal to the dramatic or I will have to end our discussion. I just can't justify your hysterics.I've no doubt you'd approve. I shall have nothing more to do with you, because you spend all your effort looking not for reality but for what supports what you wish to be true. The fact is, there are a tiny, tiny few who try to convert, and only because their religious communities, rather than loving them, give them so much guilt and hate they don't know what else to do. But if you were to actually look into the literature, you would also find -- though your religiously based sources will never tell you so -- that almost all such conversions wind up being failures.
After all, there are a couple of hundred million gay people in the world. Finding 11, 33, or even a thousand who claim to have converted, and often fall back, tells you very, very little indeed.
But your hatred is plain, and I'm done with you. Though not a Christian, I don't do hate, while so many so-called Christians do that with some apparent satisfaction. Go figure.
What on God's green earth are you talking about? Has your emotional commitment to your position overwhelmed your ability to reason? I never suggested you do anything. Why are you melting down?
I can not have a guy who I merely disagree with try and blame me for his own misery. Either stop this absurd appeal to the dramatic or I will have to end our discussion. I just can't justify your hysterics.
It most certainly is, especially male on male. It causes everything from anal cancer to massively increased rates of AIDS transmission. That is why the CDC linked homosexuality with AIDs, etc......You were comparing apples and oranges. Homosexuality is not an act that hurts others, nor is it something that is done to another person without their consent. A more appropriate comparison might be that people with green eyes exist, people with black or brown skin exist, people who are homosexuals exist. You accept people with other differences from yourself, but you refuse to accept those with a different sexual orientation. That is bigotry no matter how you try to slice it.
You just do not get it. I am not even trying to get others to think I am right, I am just trying to get you to understand what I am saying. The subject here is what I meant by what I said and I am the greatest expert on that subject in the entire history of humanity. I know what I said more so than anyone else on earth. It is an inescapable fact that I am condemning a behavior instead of a person. I have not referred to any specific person so I can't possible be condemning any specific person.We know that you've said it "over and over" but that still doesn't make what you say correct. The "behavior" you are judging is behavior that is also practiced by heterosexuals...so, obviously, it is not the "behavior" that bothers you, but rather the people who practice that behavior. You ARE judging people.
I am judging a behavior not those who practice it though I would be perfectly just if I had done so.You have consistently been judging ALL homosexuality as awful and as something that should be eliminated. Why aren't you judging promiscuity in heterosexuals? That causes problems--including AIDS--as well. Homosexuals who are in a monogamous relationship cause no more financial harm than do heterosexuals in a monogamous relationship.
Oh yes there is. It is a sexual act performed by two homosexuals.There is no such thing as "homosexual sex." There are sexual relations between homosexuals as well as heterosexuals and there is absolutely no difference.
Come off it man. No one said anything about all homosexuals having AIDS. Will you please comment on what I actually say when responding to me.Funny thing is, I am friends with several homosexual couples who are either legally married (if allowed in the state where they live) or in a long term relationship. None of them has AIDS. All of them are gainfully employed (two of them, in fact, are lawyers) and they are well respected members of their communities.
I am, homosexual sex is unbelievably destructive. I also think eating fat, lying, and chemical addiction is wrong but this isn't a thread on nutrition, liars, or addiction. I am staying on topic and trying to stop a deadly behavior. Why aren't you?You need to focus on the actual problems and not on a particular class of people you don't understand and don't like simply because they are different from you.
I see that you are still 20 years behind the times. The CDC is quite clear that dealt with HIV transmission. HIV no longer equals AIDS.It most certainly is, especially male on male. It causes everything from anal cancer to massively increased rates of AIDS transmission. That is why the CDC linked homosexuality with AIDs, etc......
Consent is irrelevant but homosexuals also produce higher rates of sexual crimes, their more sexually wreck less, and their more promiscuous.
You just do not get it. I am not even trying to get others to think I am right, I am just trying to get you to understand what I am saying. The subject here is what I meant by what I said and I am the greatest expert on that subject in the entire history of humanity. I know what I said more so than anyone else on earth. It is an inescapable fact that I am condemning a behavior instead of a person. I have not referred to any specific person so I can't possible be condemning any specific person.
I am judging a behavior not those who practice it though I would be perfectly just if I had done so.
Oh yes there is. It is a sexual act performed by two homosexuals.
Come off it man. No one said anything about all homosexuals having AIDS. Will you please comment on what I actually say when responding to me.
I am, homosexual sex is unbelievably destructive. I also think eating fat, lying, and chemical addiction is wrong but this isn't a thread on nutrition, liars, or addiction. I am staying on topic and trying to stop a deadly behavior. Why aren't you?
Okay, here's something else to chew on. I know, personally, a very great number of gay people. I've been living the life for 55 years or so, so that should be no surprise. And here is something that I have personally observed (not heard from a friend who had a girlfriend who's mother says...) a very much larger number of people who claimed to identify as heterosexual, because family, society and desire to be successful forced them to, finally admit that they are in fact homosexual. And I have known, and here I give you a very precise count, not one single person who identified as homosexual who managed to go the other way. I did know one in Toronto, who in the early seventies was so distraught at his family's desire that he change that he drowned himself in Lake Ontario, but I honestly don't think that counts as a successful conversion.Are you suggested that within the past 2000 years there have not been 3 people who embraced heterosexuality after having identified as a homosexual. I might know 3 personally. Do I really have to demonstrate something that is self evident?
Do People Change from Homosexuality? Hundreds of Stories of Hope and Transformation (Part I)
I wonder if you can even see what you just did there, in your blind hate and ignorance. You just accused me of my "own misery." As if you actually knew anything. Well trust me, you know much less about me than you know about science and human nature, and since you demonstrate very little knowledge of them, your knowledge of me becomes much less than trivial.I can not have a guy who I merely disagree with try and blame me for his own misery. Either stop this absurd appeal to the dramatic or I will have to end our discussion. I just can't justify your hysterics.
It most certainly is, especially male on male. It causes everything from anal cancer to massively increased rates of AIDS transmission. That is why the CDC linked homosexuality with AIDs, etc......
Consent is irrelevant but homosexuals also produce higher rates of sexual crimes, their more sexually wreck less, and their more promiscuous.
You just do not get it. I am not even trying to get others to think I am right, I am just trying to get you to understand what I am saying. The subject here is what I meant by what I said and I am the greatest expert on that subject in the entire history of humanity. I know what I said more so than anyone else on earth. It is an inescapable fact that I am condemning a behavior instead of a person. I have not referred to any specific person so I can't possible be condemning any specific person.
I am judging a behavior not those who practice it though I would be perfectly just if I had done so.
Oh yes there is. It is a sexual act performed by two homosexuals.
Come off it man. No one said anything about all homosexuals having AIDS. Will you please comment on what I actually say when responding to me.
I am, homosexual sex is unbelievably destructive. I also think eating fat, lying, and chemical addiction is wrong but this isn't a thread on nutrition, liars, or addiction. I am staying on topic and trying to stop a deadly behavior. Why aren't you?
Committing suicide is no joke but I never said that I thought he was serious. I jut responded to his absurdity with my own absurdity. Apparently you do not get sarcasm. Try to keep up.Seriously? SERIOUSLY???? You don't recognize sarcasm when it is so blatantly obvious? No wonder you have so much trouble understanding facts that are presented to you.
Just amazing...totally amazing.
Committing suicide is no joke but I never said that I thought he was serious. I jut responded to his absurdity with my own absurdity. Apparently you do not get sarcasm. Try to keep up.
I may very well not understand what you meant to say here but it appears your referring to cases where a homosexual may live as a heterosexual for a while then convert to homosexuality. It appears you saying because that has happened my statement was wrong. I don't understand this. Maybe I misread what you posted.Okay, here's something else to chew on. I know, personally, a very great number of gay people. I've been living the life for 55 years or so, so that should be no surprise. And here is something that I have personally observed (not heard from a friend who had a girlfriend who's mother says...) a very much larger number of people who claimed to identify as heterosexual, because family, society and desire to be successful forced them to, finally admit that they are in fact homosexual. And I have known, and here I give you a very precise count, not one single person who identified as homosexual who managed to go the other way. I did know one in Toronto, who in the early seventies was so distraught at his family's desire that he change that he drowned himself in Lake Ontario, but I honestly don't think that counts as a successful conversion.
Oh come off it. You asked me for something and I gave it to you so you mistakenly claim I said that was the only source that matters so you can ignore it's inconvenient claims. I didn't ever see who that source was, just what it said. Stop making up stuff about me that I never said or did.I add to my own personal, and therefore admittedly anecdotal, experience that there is real scientific literature on this subject, written by authentic researchers and not religious groups with an agenda like Focus on the Family, whose evidence you have decided is the only thing really worth listening to. And the real science says, "bunk!" And more to the point, superior courts in the United States are agreeing with them, on the basis that courts are notorious for using … evidence.
Gay Conversion Therapy: What You Should Know