sojourner
Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
You seem to me to be duplicitous (in not wanting to admit to the origins of your church)
Just to clarify: The restorationist attitude of the Stone-Campbell Movement was that they sought to restore the ancient order of the Apostolic faith. (In other words, the highly authoritative hierarchical structure of the bishopric and other clergy were not "original" to the Church -- the highly liturgical, "extra-Biblical" elements of worship were not "original" to the Church.)
These people sought not to begin a "new church" but to restore the ancient Church to it's proper perspective. While you and I may not agree with this tack, it does lend a certain amount of creedence to Myk's statement about the origin of his faith-system.
I am also part of the Stone-Campbell Movement. (There are three basic branches of that movement.) The Churches of Christ are to the right end of the spectrum. My branch is to the left. We consider ourselves a denomination who seeks to embrace the ancient order of the Church, while recognizing that the many expressions of Church are not only valid, but probably even necessary to its health. We seek unity through ecumenism and cooperation.