sojourner
Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
ROFLHApparetly you are the one who needs research.
Of course it's Biblical. Otherwise, the councils wouldn't have formulated it. It's their finding that is compelling to my argument, so you need to read up on them, if you want to know where I stand.again focus on the topic, "is the trinity BIBLICAL" you cant argue that it was passed through tradition you know?
The word was made flesh. Jesus is "God With Us." Jesus sent us the Holy Spirit to be with us. It's all right there in the Bible. What's the problem?
There's nothing to prove. Since Jesus was fully human, a fully human person spoke to other fully human people with regard to the Father (who, according to religious thought at that time) was assumed to be greater than any human being. That's the way the author presented the pericope.I can prove that Jesus only speaks spiritually, can you prove that he referred to the flesh???
No, it's because your posts are not well-thought out, concisely presented, nor is your argument terse enough to warrant the wasting of my time.or is it because you do not have any specifics to provide?