Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
LOL! There is nothing wrong with associating with people outside of your faith. By the way, no one claimed that the Masons were a Christian organization. And it is far better to be part of them than to be one of the cultic Christians. Please note, this person had no real objections, besides the fact that the Masons were not a prejudiced group. It sounds like the poor fellow was either a Jehovah's Witness or perhaps a Mormon.
Of course there’s nothing wrong with associating with others outside the faith. It’s participating in rituals which have spiritual meaning and/or implications with others outside the biblical faith wherein the problem arises.
Can you find a valid source that supports you?
I did include a valid source. Whether you like it or consider it valid or not is merely a matter of your own opinion. The article I linked explains the differences between the biblical teachings on subjects of God, salvation, sin, human nature, etc. and those of the Freemasonry, as does the following one below.
No, your source appears to be highly biased and perhaps more than a little superstitious.
Then you really don’t know enough about Masonic tenets to make that judgment call.
“Got questions.org” is not a reliable source of Masonic information.
There is no one within Freemasonry who disagrees with any other Freemason on the spiritual matters presented. In fact, it is a Masonic offense to talk about religion when gathered.
The article is patently wrong in its presentation of the Freemason’s various oaths.
Well how will they know that they are wrong if I don't tell them?
I’m getting really tired of toxic Jesus fandom. These people are fandigelicals.
Why not?
Because Masons don’t present themselves in public as “anti-Christian.” Because in order to come to a knowledge of the oaths, rituals, and tenets, one has to go through the initiations and lectures, since such things are held in secret. Freemasons are precluded from divulging such information. Therefore, the veracity of any information that becomes public is highly suspect. Because the experiences of others are highly biased.
The bible is the strongest evidence against the BOM .
No, no. It really is not. There is no difference between the two except for time.
Your source is patently wrong and highly biased with regard to Freemasonry.
I've not read the bible once and thought ,hey you know what this needs , it needs a completely different narrative adding onto what's already written . Its just another religion that latches onto christianity.
The problem is that one can always attach another tale to a book of myths. That is all that was done.
Archaeology and anthropology are the strongest evidence against, so long as the historical veracity of its stories is the basis for its validity.
