Kinda. In the cartoon, the KKK member and the person arguing for civility with the KKK are the same person; I don’t think you’re akin to a KKK member, but I do think you’re asking for civility - or I would argue passivity - in the fave of the KKK and their ilk.
Passive (non)response in the name of direct hate is not at all what I'm talking about or arguing for.
I think it's a mistake to pretend the only two options in this conversation are complicity and extremism.
There's a ****-ton of middle ground between the two, which I think are vastly more important and prevalent in society, and cartoons like this casually brush over that in favor of the extremes, which only fuels the idea that there's only two options... It's a vicious cycle. And that's silly.
I think there are some people who will have violent hate no matter what you do; for these people, it’s best to reduce the harm they can do by cutting them off from society and support.
For that minority population, I would agree.
But the majority of people who favor a given political ideology aren't solidified to the point of being in cahoots with organized hate groups. Which means they're reachable. And reachable people should be reached.