Wu Wei
ursus senum severiorum and ex-Bisy Backson
Response....
only problem with that response was it is not classical music and has no place in the classical corner..like this piece does....
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Response....
Classical music evolves.only problem with that response was it is not classical music and has no place in the classical corner..like this piece does....
Classical music evolves.
Herrmann is no less "classical" than Bach.
And the former surpasses the latter in variety & raw power.
Wimpy, eh.OK it's classical, but not more powerful IMO, actually IMO it is rather wimpy, and to say the latter is more powerful is a generalization, and generalizations rarely work well, that and I can't stand them, they make for weak arguments that show little experience. IMO, the former is much more powerful than most, not all, that came later. However to argue that point would be ridiculous sense it is a matter of opinion....
Wimpy, eh.
Psycho at 5:50 is anything but.
I have no experience. I know nothing about music. No training.
But at least I'm not mired in a limited view what classical music is.
Btw, I like that video you linked....it's from A Clockwork Orange.
Modern composers have a great advantage in having history
to sample, greater variety to inspire, more instruments to use,
& technology to be more efficient. So it's no surprise that
modern classical music is also different & great.
Another favorite...
There are contemporary composers who still imitate classical music - with variations. Sir Jon's "Sarabande" is a collection of dances in the style of baroque composers. You may scoff about the unorthodox instrumentation but it is classical.OK it's classical, but not more powerful IMO, actually IMO it is rather wimpy, and to say the latter is more powerful is a generalization, and generalizations rarely work well, that and I can't stand them, they make for weak arguments that show little experience. IMO, the former is much more powerful than most, not all, that came later. However to argue that point would be ridiculous sense it is a matter of opinion....
I am always truthful....except when playing Devil's advocate.I have noticed, since being on RF, there are days you lie to pick fights.....
There are contemporary composers who still imitate classical music - with variations. Sir Jon's "Sarabande" is a collection of dances in the style of baroque composers. You may scoff about the unorthodox instrumentation but it is classical.
(My favourite, the Bourrée, starts at 26:45.)
I am always truthful....except when playing Devil's advocate.
This is not one of those times.....classical music snob!!!!
I'm more of a Group W type than Room 12A.Well I could call you a plebeian...would that make you feel better.....and feed into your need to argue...you need room 12A....
What is "classical" music to you? For me it is a style, based on traditional western music with chromatic keys and an upbeat rhythm.Yes, I know, I grew up playing the guitar, mostly electric, and I liked playing classical bits and pieces on it......but the word you used is "contemporary"....think about it with reference to the thread title
I'm more of a Group W type than Room 12A.
But I notice....
Those who accuse other of being argumentative
are the one's holding up half of the argument.
What is "classical" music to you? For me it is a style, based on traditional western music with chromatic keys and an upbeat rhythm.
The major time divisions of classical music up to 1900 are the Early music period, which includes Medieval (500–1400) and Renaissance (1400–1600) eras, and the Common practice period, which includes the Baroque (1600–1750), Classical (1750–1820), and Romantic (1810–1910) eras. The current period encompasses the 20th century and the 21st-century to date and includes the Modernist musical era and the Contemporary or Postmodern musical era, the dates of which are often disputed.
Here is the place for all things classical music. Anything and everything about it, whether you already enjoy it or are maybe just curious. I discovered I liked it quite by accident a year or three ago and now my CD collection has swung from being virtually 100% popular music (mostly rock) to probably about 80% classical.
Enjoy!
(I searched for a thread such as this but couldn't find a general, all-encompassing one. If there is and I missed it please feel free to merge it or whatever).
I thought it was mere banter...starting with your post (#101).please take your attempts to goad me into an argument elsewhere, I will not respond to this line of posts with you further
Well, now he's dead.
But classical music thrives.
New compositions....
New interpretations of old works....
We should ask him.I have a Wendy Carlos album - nice. (and I assume Zappa was joking)
You ask him. You have the superior mask.We should ask him.
I've heard he's no longer granting interviews.You ask him. You have the superior mask.
Who talks about an interview? It's just one question. And it was your idea to ask him. You can ask away even if you don't get an answer. But you may, after all ...I've heard he's no longer granting interviews.