mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
Well, the actual life is local.
You really don't understand that the range of temperatur is as relevant or how many areas could be covered in too high a temperatur?
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Climate change denial
- Thread starter Estro Felino
- Start date
Well, the actual life is local.
You really don't understand that the range of temperatur is as relevant or how many areas could be covered in too high a temperatur?
We Never Know
No Slack
Where are you getting local for all life on earth? .
mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
All life don't all as individuals live everywhere. A given individual is always living local.
Pogo
Well-Known Member
They are two mostly unrelated numbers other than they have temperature in common. Whatever the global average is, nobody lives in antarctica anyway because it isn't anywhere near 68 there, likewise for Death Valley but both places are included in the global average.
We Never Know
No Slack
Its talking about all life on earth. Humans are just one of millions of species on earth.
Still don't get where you think its talking about local.
anotherneil
Well-Known Member
Ok, please proceed with my request without breaking any rules (or turn down my request); I never asked you to break a rule. If you want to reply but are scared of responding in a certain way, then reference a thread and a post #.
mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
We Never Know
No Slack
Those places are used for the global average for current and opitimal. If they aren't used, it isn't global.
So your point?
Last edited:
mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
Please go back and give your answer to the relevant poster and that is not me. You can find the person by backtraking the posts.
Pogo
Well-Known Member
that there was no point to those two numbers being in the same post. There are places and times of the day on the moon when it is 68 which is optimal for most mammals, but really has nothing to do with the average global temperature on the moon whatever it is or any other planet for that matter.
We've all been told a disasterous lie - over and over and over again - since we were born. That lie is that "economies must grow endlessly in order to be healthy".
Until we stop believing in that lie, nothing else will really matter.
Until we stop believing in that lie, nothing else will really matter.
anotherneil
Well-Known Member
No; you're the one who chimed in and are speaking with me. I'm speaking with you, right now, not them. If you want them to do something, you do the requesting; you're the one who wants that, not me.
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
But we well know what "science" overwhelmingly says. It's happening and they know most of why it's happening.
I guess you can do your own research. I would suggest starting by scanning this very thread.
But the fact remains there are people who deny climate change. I am glad they are in the minority now, but it is not such a small minority that they are hard to find. Just look.
And on a completely unrelated subject, I love numbers. I love all numbers. But I really love the number 8. 8 is a fantastic number. I am just mentioning how much I love the number 8 for no reason at all.
But good luck with your research.
We Never Know
No Slack
The moon? More is needed than an optimal temp on the moon for life to thrive lol
We are talking about earth.
The average global temp has now hit 62.88°F
The optimal global temp for life to thrive is 68°F(some can do colder, some can do warmer)
Its said that if temperatures increase by 2°C by 2100, about 18% of all species on land will face a high risk of going extinct.
As the link I posted said, "All species on Earth appear to thrive at an “optimal” 20 degrees Celsius (68 degrees Fahrenheit), according to a new study, which suggests land species may struggle more to adapt to changing climate."
anotherneil
Well-Known Member
Maybe I already have done my research; has this even occurred to you?
The truth is that no one is denying climate change.
The claim that there are such individuals comes from propaganda being delivered by politicians, crony capitalists, celebrities, religious zealots, etc. It's nothing more than a strawman attack.
mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
Okay.
Okay, so that was your answer to another poster than me about yet another poster.
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
Here's what the climate scientists are more worried about: if 2+ C is reached, the permafrost in the Arctic will melt at an increasing rate releasing millions of tons of methane gas, and that gas is 20 times more heat retentive than CO2.
We Never Know
No Slack
anotherneil
Well-Known Member
If you want to walk back what you originally posted, go right ahead. It's fine with me; I won't penalize you for that.