We should note that Pastafarians have no strict prescription for headgear.
There are other ways to express ones noodliness...
There are other ways to express ones noodliness...
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That would be meta-silly indeed!Oh, getting upset over silliness is a whole other level of silliness.
It goes better with their neckbeards if you ask me.
This is more in the category of "fetching"....What is and isn't "foolish" is in the eye of the beholder, is it not?
There has been a growing trend among certain atheists to fight for the right to wear colanders on their heads when having their photo taken for government issued IDs. It is meant to be a political statement against the allowance of religious head gear. What are everyone's thoughts on this? Is it a legitimate statement? Should religious believers not be allowed to have any religious headgear, what so ever, in government issued IDs? Or is it a childish act that does more to harm the already very poor view that people have of atheists?
If you want your ID to identify your religious Beliefs with head wear go for it. As long as I can see your face. As to the Atheists if they like to be identified as colander wearing people in official ID's, that's fine. They're making a statement that atheists like to wear colanders on the head. Not to many people are going to find that intelligent.
...Said he who omitted three (count 'em) commas in his reply...I find it ironic that you'd criticize someone else's intelligence in a post where you yourself made at least five glaring grammatical errors.
I usually let spelling and grammar mistakes slide, but I'll make exceptions for cases of hypocrisy.
Two, actually, and that was a deliberate stylistic choice....Said he who omitted three (count 'em) commas in his reply...
I find it ironic that you'd criticize someone else's intelligence in a post where you yourself made at least five glaring grammatical errors.
I usually let spelling and grammar mistakes slide, but I'll make exceptions for cases of hypocrisy.
Two, actually, and that was a deliberate stylistic choice.
^^Three, as emphasized in red above.^^I find it ironic that you'd criticize someone else's intelligence in a post where you, yourself, made at least five glaring, grammatical errors.
Minus the glaring grammatical errors do you believe most people will think wearing a colander on your head for an official ID intelligent.
Personally, I think the protest is... full of holes. :takeabow:I imagine that many people who miss the point of it will consider it stupid.
So... if the colanders are being worn as a "religious" statement, doesn't that make them, by definition, a "liturgical colander?" :beach:The holey mocks the holy! BWAHA!
So... if the colander is being worn as a "religious" statement, doesn't that make it, by definition, a "liturgical colander?" :beach:The holey mocks the holy! BWAHA!
The holey mocks the holy! BWAHA!
Maybe he's feeling a little strained
Personally, I think the protest is... full of holes. :takeabow:
The holey mocks the holy! BWAHA!
So... if the colanders are being worn as a "religious" statement, doesn't that make them, by definition, a "liturgical colander?" :beach:
Maybe he's feeling a little strained
These puns just don't hold water.