• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Comrade Trumpsky: The rise of Russian Influence in the USA.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Like Obama.... .....single-handedly took out Usama Bin Laden
I don't think so.
Some seals assisted him a teensie bit.

Single handedly, huh.....an image forms....
th
 

esmith

Veteran Member
Well, at least you admit to that! This is the first I've seen you do so! So, if you agree to all of that: then what conspiracy theory? We agree on the facts. You haven't answered as to why Russia has done it, and given their love of Kopromat (anglicized) what other conclusion could you possibly make for their interference? Moreover, he's played into their hands with this by spouting his love of Putin and his desire to work with Russia. What's his and their end game? When DO we say enough? You seem more dismissive of this and not concerned at all. That's not a good way to protect us from foreign interlopers.
If you don't mind I will hold my opinion until after he becomes President and see what he does or doesn't do in reference to Russia and the rest of the nation states, and terrorist of all religions, ethnicity's, or political beliefs that bode us harm.
Of course you are entitled to continue to prattle.
 

tytlyf

Not Religious
If you don't mind I will hold my opinion until after he becomes President and see what he does or doesn't do in reference to Russia and the rest of the nation states, and terrorist of all religions, ethnicity's, or political beliefs that bode us harm.
Of course you are entitled to continue to prattle.
Too many red flags. Been russian red flags for over a year. You think that's just a coincidence? I don't think you think highly of the American government. Most conservatives don't like the American government. They don't like government employees, they don't like anything government.
But since the America intelligence community concluded their findings with evidence, you still don't trust them. Mostly because Trump doesn't trust them. You side with Assange over American intel.
It's obvious that information 'drip drip dripped' for months on end at specific time frames to benefit Trump. The same way republicans used the email server fiasco as 'drip drip dripped.'
Trump had to fire his campaign manager after russian/ukranian connections.
It's obvious to me that the information from Wikileaks was used by RW media to politicize the election. RW media and Trump encouraged further data release from the russian hacks. They welcomed it. The information released in the hacks doesn't have to be damaging or harmful, RW media will spin it in their favor.

To say the information obtained didn't sway a single vote is ridiculous. Dangerous voters.
 

esmith

Veteran Member
Too many red flags. Been russian red flags for over a year. You think that's just a coincidence? I don't think you think highly of the American government. Most conservatives don't like the American government. They don't like government employees, they don't like anything government.
But since the America intelligence community concluded their findings with evidence, you still don't trust them. Mostly because Trump doesn't trust them. You side with Assange over American intel.
It's obvious that information 'drip drip dripped' for months on end at specific time frames to benefit Trump. The same way republicans used the email server fiasco as 'drip drip dripped.'
Trump had to fire his campaign manager after russian/ukranian connections.
It's obvious to me that the information from Wikileaks was used by RW media to politicize the election. RW media and Trump encouraged further data release from the russian hacks. They welcomed it. The information released in the hacks doesn't have to be damaging or harmful, RW media will spin it in their favor.

To say the information obtained didn't sway a single vote is ridiculous. Dangerous voters.
I also respond to your above in the same way I did @Scuba Pete

Maybe before you get yourself in trouble elsewhere I suggest that you take a step back and think before you make accusations against someone you know nothing about. The interweb gives you anonymity and allows you to say almost anything you want without the possibility of recrimination. However in the real world false accusations and innuendos do have consequences. I normally attribute postings such as the one above to misunderstandings or ignorance about the person you are denigrating. But in this instance you have crossed the line by insinuating that I'm putting self above country. Fifty six years ago I signed a blank check and promised to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies both foreign and domestic. That oath still remains in effect. So let's set the record straight once and for all.
1. The Russians did obtain emails from the DNC and John Podesta using various means of cyber attacks
2. Wikileaks released the emails from the DNC and John Podesta
3. These emails were released to harm Hillary's chance to become the 45th President of the United States.
4. Since the action was directed at Hillary it can be logically concluded they would favor now President-elect Trump
Those are the only facts that are known outside of those having the need-to-know.
All other suppositions presented by you are nothing more than opinions. Now since you are entitled to your opinions I have to accept your right to express them. However, when you direct those opinions directly at me without any knowledge of what I think or stand for you have crossed the line. However since this is the anonymous interweb, I have two choices concerning your thoughts, either to put you on ignore or accept them for what they are, and I think you know what that is. Therefore I chose the second option.

That good enough answer for you?
 

Scuba Pete

Le plongeur avec attitude...
Of course you are entitled to continue to prattle.
Ah, your passive aggressive nature shines through. Full of bluster about spurious accusations and then you take the cheap shot. That's truly fraudulent. Sorry you got your widdle feelings hurt. But this is a veiled threat, n'est pas?

You side with Assange over American intel.
But he signed a blank check. Surely he'll come after you for such horrible accusations.

RW media and Trump encouraged further data release from the russian hacks. They welcomed it.
This is the real smoking gun. They got what they wanted, but at what price? They were quick to accuse Clinton over her server, but where is the outrage here? Why does Comrade Trumpsky get a pass when there's actual video evidence of him asking Russia to hack US citizens???
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top