Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
But how can they all be right if they're all different?Scavengers act out of necessity, not logic. You can't expect someone to act logically at first. With time someone should realize that all paths to salvation are valid.
Why do religious people persecute each other when no one has equal amount of proof for their own religion?
It is logical that there is a god. All religions in the world have a strong degree of logic, so if you like a religion and can put your faith in it you should. I'm just saying that someone should acknowledge that their religion is as good as the next guy's.
Try the Ghandi approach.
Why do religious people persecute each other when no one has equal amount of proof for their own religion?
I do believe that man created "God", but if god is a projection of our egos then there could be no selfless religious person. That's not the case."Gods" are a projection of our own egos (and everything it entails, like dominance and control), so not worshiping someone's god their way is a slap to their face. So things turn into a competitive power struggle.
Ghandi accepted and appreciated all religions. Even though he was a Hindu.You mean to recommend Britain surrender to Hitler, criticize the Jews for not committing mass suicide, deny your wife medical treatment resulting in her death but accept medical treatment for yourself later on, and to disown your own son for having had sex, leaving him to die a homeless drunk?
Why do religious people persecute each other when no one has equal amount of proof for their own religion?
Why do religious people persecute each other when no one has equal amount of proof for their own religion?