waitasec
Veteran Member
If a majority of people oppose God it will be time for Him to judge the earth.
why...?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
If a majority of people oppose God it will be time for Him to judge the earth.
not to mention an insecure god who wants to rule with the manipulation of tyrannyThe truth is that God is the greatest slaveholder of all. He expects complete obedience.
so the emancipation proclamation, was an act of ignorance and degradation in the eyes of your god?God isn't likely to change his view on homosexuality simply because people have become ignorant. The genreal trend today is not toward God's righteousness but towards degradation.
The truth is that God is the greatest slaveholder of all. He expects complete obedience.
God isn't likely to change his view on homosexuality simply because people have become ignorant. The genreal trend today is not toward God's righteousness but towards degradation.
Why would you worship a slave owning hate mongering god? He's not deserving of worship.
If a majority of people oppose God it will be time for Him to judge the earth.
Or he will just join Zeus and Odin in the expired God list.
By the same token, society has grown and departed (or is in the process of it, anyhow) from the times when condemnation of homosexuality was considered acceptable.With the context of the ancient day. Society has grown and departed from the times when everybody owned slaves.
... being beaten to death, provided it took you a few days to die... sounds like paradise on Earth, really.The slavery laws in Torah are not so bad. No getting beaten for no reason and being taken care of, then freed after a bit of time.
Hi Agnostic75,The article concludes with "opponents of gay marriage aren’t defending the Bible’s values. They’re using the Bible to defend their own." I would go further by saying that if the Bible condemns homosexuality, those authors defended their own values, not God's values.
Hi Agnostic75,
Though your thread is now protracted a bit. I will take a shot at the OP and your request that Conservative Christians should reexamine their vies on homosexuality.
Bold mine. I am assuming that you are specifically addressing conservative Christian "opponents of gay marriage". The bolded statement is a faulty paradigm.
The fact that gay marriage is condemned by CC's is because the Bible condemns homosexual behavior as sin and also institutes that marriage is between a man and a woman. In this sense CC's are trying to be consistent with Biblical values.
The bolded statement seems to assert that the Bible actually has a set of values that would support homosexual behavior and same sex marriage.
Would you be willing to make that case for me?
or rather, would be willing to agree with me that the Bible does not in any way establish values that institute the acceptability of homosexual behavior or same sex marriage?
Respectfully,
Mudcat
I was with you on the intrinsically disordered bit but I haven't the foggiest idea where you got this part from "greater threat than destruction of the environment".One probably doesn't need to have sermons condemning homosexuality when the head of your religion (aka the Pope) regularly calls homosexuals "intrinsically disordered", and views their secular, civilly recognized relationships as a greater threat than destruction of the environment.
I was with you on the intrinsically disordered bit but I haven't the foggiest idea where you got this part from "greater threat than destruction of the environment".
i just did a quick google search with "greater threat than destruction of the environment" and added "pope" and "homosexuality"...
and got this...
The Pope, Homosexuality and the Environment | TheTheologiansCafe on Xanga
Pope Accused of Stoking Homophobia After Speech - International News | News of the World | Middle East News | Europe News - FOXNews.com
That's great and all but I can't say I rely too much on media to interpret what Rome or the Pope says is correct. However, all he was really saying is that human ecology is more important then the enviroment. You don't have to be religious to agree with that.
That is in scripture. And if one wants to follow it then that is fine. But the Law is not binding anymore. But homosexuality is still forbidden in the NT
If a majority of people oppose God it will be time for Him to judge the earth.
I think you have to dodge the corpus of scripture that actually deals with those behaviors to come up with the notion that GR in the Biblical context approves of homosexuality and ss marriage.yes indeed it does...
the golden rule. it's no ones business...especially if we are talking about 2 consenting adults...
I think you have to dodge the corpus of scripture that actually deals with those behaviors to come up with the notion that GR in the Biblical context approves of homosexuality and ss marriage.
Interesting prooftext though.
My initial response was to the charge that Bible has a set of values that is permissive to homosexual behavior and does not advocate SS marriage.i'm not sure i know what you mean...jesus never said a word about homosexuality but he did mention the GR
so why not be one who promotes peace instead of strife?
You then presented your case that the Bible asserts such:Mudcat said:The bolded statement seems to assert that the Bible actually has a set of values that would support homosexual behavior and same sex marriage.
Would you be willing to make that case for me?
I then say that you are proof texting and ignoring the fact that Bible is actually unfavorable to both.waitasec said:yes indeed it does...
the golden rule. it's no ones business...especially if we are talking about 2 consenting adults...
The rule itself, has little to know meaning unless grounded in some ethical system. Thus Christs referral to this being somewhat of a summary of the intent of the Law and Prophets.Mat 7:12 So then, whatever you desire that others would do to and for you, even so do also to and for them, for this is (sums up) the Law and the Prophets.
Let me try to address your claim that the GR advocates homosexual behavior and SS marriage.
Mat 7:12 So then, whatever you desire that others would do to and for you, even so do also to and for them, for this is (sums up) the Law and the Prophets.
The rule in specific, per Christ, from the Amplified Bible:
The rule itself, has little to know meaning unless grounded in some ethical system. Thus Christs referral to this being somewhat of a summary of the intent of the Law and Prophets.
no because that would be infringing on personal rights of the offendedThe reason I say it has little meaning is that without some background of ethics, the rule is entirely relative to oneself.
In abstract cases the GR could meet with unfavorable results.
A self masochist, would be vindicated in masochism of others.
no, that person would be a murderer...A person might wish to be killed, ergo they are vindicated in killing others.
no, not at all...it is because we happen to live in a society that values the principles of solidarity...what you are suggesting is that the golden rule supports anarchy...if not taken in the right context...but i think if we apply rationality and logic we can come up with a solution that would be more on the terms jesus lays out in luke 6 so very clearly...Surely you can see the difficulty.
i'm not sure how though..can you please clarify...After your citation of the Golden Rule, you then suggest that whatever 2 consenting adults agree upon is fine. This, however, is a distortion of the Golden Rule and removes any actual ethical scenario beyond that which two people agree on.
This scenario suffers the same issue and seems quite apart from the teachings of the Bible