• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Conservative radio host Jesse Kelly says America needs a dictator

Does America need a dictator?

  • Yes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No

    Votes: 3 8.8%
  • **** no!

    Votes: 28 82.4%
  • No need; we already have one

    Votes: 1 2.9%
  • Yes, but only if I get to name who is dictator (name your choice)

    Votes: 2 5.9%
  • Undecided/No opinion

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    34

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
The Durham report has shown, what many people knew, which was the Political left; Swamp, has set up an injustice system, where the truth is called a lie and the lie is called the truth, and the criminals are not punished. This extends to their propaganda machine in the fake news media. That is not how Democracy works. Democracy requires public servants and not criminal overlords and media con artists. Democracy can only work when you have moral people; play by one set of rules.

The Government is broken when crooks are able to set up a system, where they can perform injustice, at will, and are not held accountable. Durham pointed out this pattern of behavior, since 2014, but did not pass individual judgment. He handed it off to the injustice department, who he knew would ignore the crimes; no names to prevent revenge, but the pattern of behavior would be reported to the people. A dictator would have the power to purge the crooks and bring them to trial, in spite of their resistance and control of injustice.

If we had a honest system in place; checks and balances, where people are held accountable, then a dictator would make things worse. But when you have a self serving corrupt system, too strong to overcome playing by the rules, you might need someone who can by-pass the self serving red tape, and set the government right. We may need a benevolent dictator until the ship is made right. He would reside over a system restore, back to a better time when government was of the people, by the people and for the people.

Trump, after being a victim for so long, has a big enough chip on his shoulder to shake the house until the roaches leave or are fumigated. He is the only one to endure their all out assault, which continues even today. Once the system restore is done, then back to normal business.

Anyone who gets into the White House, and wants to right the system, will have to content with sabotage and obstruction by the crooks. They do not wish to lose power. Trump lived with that and has experience as to how to beat the crooks at their own game.

A new President has to make lots of appointments and one mistake Trump made the first time, was to allow crooks in sheep clothing, to fill important positions. He was new and the players were not yet differentiated. DeSantis would be a good President, but he is not prepared for the crooks weaseling into his administration for spying and sabotage. He would be better after the ship is made right. DeSantis may be a good running mate, since He and Trump, could fight two fronts at once.
Trump is a victim? Puh-lease. :tearsofjoy:

Somebody bought into the propaganda.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Does putin have a gun to your head? Maybe it's Trump. Maybe it's you.

You aren't talking like a free American citizen who believes in democracy and shared responsibility for governing.

Looking at the debt ceiling issue it's frightening that Trump and many MAGAs want the economy to collapse just to make Biden look bad. It's murder/suicide type thinking, and anti-American. What the hell? Why do democrats have to deal with this side of destructive politics?
I'll change my mind if Democrats lose their love affair with Marxism and Communism.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member

..and yes it's a conservative source because the left will not admit it.

If you prefer a more whitewashed version.....

Let's take a gander ...

"The Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) is an openly Marxist group of Democratic party congressmembers advocating for single party control of the U.S. government and disposal of the United States Constitution. As of 2019, it has 95 members or about 40% of elected Democrat House members.[1] The caucus is a hotbed of Anti-Semitism.

The Caucus was founded in 1991 by a single member, Bernie Sanders,
who refused to join the Democratic party while offering to support other member's bills if they would join the caucus, compromising them by outing them as far left socialists."


I couldn't get past the lines I've bolded there .... Yeah, Bernie Sanders is well known for his virulent anti-Semitism. :rolleyes:

Here's their actual website:


And from Wikipedia:

"The Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) is a congressional caucus affiliated with the Democratic Party in the United States Congress.[6] The CPC represents the most left-leaning faction of the Democratic Party.[7][8] It was founded in 1991 and has grown since then, becoming the largest Democratic caucus in the House of Representatives.

As of the 118th United States Congress, the CPC has 102 members (100 voting Representatives, 1 non-voting Delegate, and 1 Senator), making it the largest ideological caucus in the Democratic Party (larger than the New Democrat Coalition) and the second largest ideological caucus overall (after the Republican Study Committee). The CPC is chaired by U.S. Representative Pramila Jayapal (D-WA).

The CPC was established in 1991 by U.S. Representatives Ron Dellums (D-CA), Lane Evans (D-IL), Thomas Andrews (D-ME), Peter DeFazio (D-OR), Maxine Waters (D-CA) and Bernie Sanders (I-VT). Additional Representatives joined soon thereafter, including Major Owens (D-NY), Nydia Velázquez (D-NY), David Bonior (D-MI), Bob Filner (D-CA), Barney Frank (D-MA), Maurice Hinchey (D-NY), Jim McDermott (D-WA), Jerry Nadler (D-NY), Patsy Mink (D-HI), George Miller (D-CA), Pete Stark (D-CA), John Olver (D-MA), and Lynn Woolsey (D-CA). Sanders was the first CPC Chairman.[9]"
 
Last edited:

PureX

Veteran Member
Not so much from the libertarian perspective.
Hence the term, "illiberal liberal".
It's just that the left generally understands the difference between liberty and selfishness. Something most libertarians not only don't understand, but actively reject.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
It's just that the left generally understands the difference between liberty and selfishness.
But they prefer selfishness, eg, filling government
coffers with stolen money (civil forfeiture abuse),
clamoring for more money earned by someone
else, silencing others lest they be triggered,
Something most libertarians not only don't understand, but actively reject.
Liberty is the freedom to be selfish without
making others pay for it. Liberals understand
that....they just oppose it.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
They never had one, so we are waiting for you to stop listening to right wing nonsense, and then embarrassing yourself by repeating it as if you can’t think for yourself.
No. There is no uproar over the open socialists already in government, all Democrats.

That is telling where the priority lays.
 

RestlessSoul

Well-Known Member
What you guys need is a King. England, on the other hand, would be better off without one at this point. So, what am I bid? Or you could appoint Harry and Meghan I suppose. They seem to like it over there…
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
No Marxists. No Communists. Thanks for adjusting your disinformation for us. Of course we already know your heavy and laughable bias.
There is no disinformation.

Here is straight from the horses mouth. Take it or leave it.


We have open socialists in government right now at this very minute. Maybe wake up to solid facts for once.

I'm not laughing about it.

Neither is this Marine, who fought for this country with his blood and sweat , is laughing either....

 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
Not so much from the libertarian perspective.
Hence the term, "illiberal liberal".
Yes, but we can't help it. We're wired to believe if we throw junk on the sidewalk, we ought to be held responsible to pick it up, just as we can't help thinking that if corporations corrupt the environment, they really ought to have put money into escrow to clean it up when they're done, where libertarians think they should be able to do anything they want, and somebody else'll clean it up ---- or not, meh.
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member

F1fan

Veteran Member
There is no disinformation.
More disinformation.
Here is straight from the horses mouth. Take it or leave it.


We have open socialists in government right now at this very minute. Maybe wake up to solid facts for once
Laughable sources. Jeez is this the best you can come up with?
I'm not laughing about it.

Neither is this Marine, who fought for this country with his blood and sweat , is laughing either....

Who cares what he thinks? It’s not true or credible. You guys lean so heavily on your fear tactics that you can’t even see how bogus it is. No facts. No coherent argument. You right wingers have no platform any more. You’re just against various people and ideas that not only don’t exist as you imply it, they aren’t even threats.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
More disinformation.

Laughable sources. Jeez is this the best you can come up with?

Who cares what he thinks? It’s not true or credible. You guys lean so heavily on your fear tactics that you can’t even see how bogus it is. No facts. No coherent argument. You right wingers have no platform any more. You’re just against various people and ideas that not only don’t exist as you imply it, they aren’t even threats.
I expected no less of a comment from you in this regard.

Have a good day.
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
Are you claiming that all the liberals in the world support, let alone are members of, that horse-doo-doo?

Odd that this liberal has never heard of them, nor have the last 5 liberal people I just asked.

When are you going to be honest?
Im about as left as a citizen can be and I’ve never heard of this nonsense. It’s the right wing unable to stand for any popular policies so create an enemy out of thin air.
 
Top