*Giggles* Ah, ok. *sigh* Oddly, our intelligence allows us to ask silly questions and offer less than ingenious observations. Other lifeforms, to the best of our knowledge, don't do that either.
Part of the huge problem here is the gargantuan distances involved. We have no idea if there are any alien races. We may never know. That still doesn't explain why the universe would care about us or possibly about others
I'd love to see some docs to support the highlighted amusing notion.
To paraphrase Sagan, don't you think its and awful waste of space if we are the only ones? Note: I'm not a believer in aliens, I'm like Fox Mulder who would like to believe... if only... I still don't get why that makes us the sole beneficiary of the entire cosmos. That could prove quite disastrous if we ran into another species who suffered from the same delusion.
That's good of you.
I disagree with most of your comments but where have you been for the last 25 years? Astronomy and cosmology is a hobby of mine so I may be a little more attuned with current science than the average Joe. I just thought everyone knew of the implications of WIMP and the latest probes and telescopes studies. I am not referencing the old but still relevant claims of Penrose and other scientists of a decade or two ago who said the odds astronomically against a universe like ours ie able to support life. The current and most popular claims point to the balance between dark energy dark matter and spacetime. If you really wanted you could have found this material yourself but I will get you started with some of the newer and older docs as you call them;
http://www.livescience.com/46478-universe-should-have-collapsed.html
here is an excerpt ;
Modeling of conditions soon after the Big Bang suggests
the universe should have collapsed just microseconds after its explosive birth, the new study suggests.
“During the early universe, we expected cosmic inflation — this is a rapid expansion of the universe right after the Big Bang,” said study co-author Robert Hogan, a doctoral candidate in physics at King’s College in London. “This expansion causes
lots of stuff to shake around, and if we
shake it too much, we could go into this new energy space,
which could cause the universe to collapse.”
In short, the expansion had to be finely-tuned for the Universe’s existence—and ours. Although the alleged confirmation of inflation is being debated (see
6/24/14), the properties of the Higgs Field are tenuous in any expansion. Cosmologists at King’s College London looked into their models:
What they found was
bad news for, well, everything. The newborn
universe should have experienced an intense jittering in the energy field, known as quantum fluctuation. Those jitters, in turn,
could have disrupted the Higgs field, in essence rolling the entire system into a much lower energy state that
would make the collapse of the universe inevitable.
The article goes on to mention that the Standard Model still leaves important factors in the universe unexplained. Peter Higgs makes a cameo appearance in the article.
People know instinctively the world is designed. They have to be trained not to know it. Scientists, especially, undergo rigorous training to lose their common sense. Oh, they have common sense within their world view, but when their restricted common sense runs into roadblocks inside their secular box, they fret and fume and refuse to consider the obvious implication. They love darkness rather than light. That’s why they chase phantoms like dark matter, dark energy, and dark “new physics” that nobody has ever observed or even knows how to observe. Anything but Intelligent Design!
Their reactions undercut their logic. By using argumentation, rationality and emotion, they prove they already are Supernaturalists, because such things do not derive from particles and forces. Indeed, particles and forces fall into the Incompleteness Theorem; they can only be
understood with reference to reality outside themselves—the conceptual world of mind and logic. That reality, subsequently, can only be understood with reference to a greater Reality outside it—a personal, rational, eternal God: the First Cause from which everything derives.
Theologians and creationists have pointed to the fine-tuning of the universe, the Anthropic Principle and such things for decades. The only sufficient condition for the Universe’s ability to say “I exist!” is the foundation in Genesis 1:1, “In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.” We’ve seen in recent years the atheists rushing to embrace a multiverse instead of creation (
5/17/14), despite the
infinite regress trap it presents to them. What we see with the current hand-wringing over the finely-tuned Higgs field is just more of the anti-rational reaction Paul described so well in
Romans 1:18–24.
Another the universe shouldnt be here site;
http://www.nbcnews.com/science/weir...eorist-claims-universe-shouldnt-exist-n138911
If you want tech stuff go KEYWORDS DARK ENERGY DARK MATTER WIMP CHANDRA
Lastly in one of my prior my replies I pointed out that we are an undeniable part of the universe. Our brain our mind and our thoughts are THE UNIVERSE. So in fact a part of the universe really does care.....
God bless our universe~
Thus saith God the LORD, he that created the heavens, AND STRETCHED THEM OUT (EXPANDED); he that spread forth the earth, and that which cometh out of it; he that giveth breath unto the people upon it, and spirit to them that walk therein:
Isaiah 42:5
